Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Sonnova Sonnova is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,337
Default LP inferior?

On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:39:12 -0800, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ):

wrote in message

On Dec 5, 7:25 pm, Steven Sullivan
wrote:


Except, it's never been demonstrated that 'hi rez CD' or
SACD or DVD-A, intrinsically sound any different from
Redbook CD, at normal listening levels. Such differences
that can normally be heard between then, are more likely
due to different mastering choices.


Which may just reveal the limits of the current
(non-verified for musical evaluation) penchant for using
ABX for everything and declaring that it all sounds the
same.


There is no such thing as a penchant for using ABX for everything. A
statement like this shows a considerable lack of familiarity with how proper
subjective tests have been done since the middle 1990s.

Interested parties are directed to ITU recommendation BS-1116 and other
similar documents from international standards groups.



I think that what hlavo meant was that if a difference is noted in an ABX
test between an SACD/DVD-A mastering of a particular recording and the
Redbook version of the same recording, it may be due to differences between
the way the two versions were mastered rather than any actual difference
between the sound of the encoding methodologies.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
phantom imaging-why digital is inferior to analog in end-use jailhouserock Pro Audio 68 April 2nd 07 10:10 PM
Why duh-Mikey is an inferior being George M. Middius Audio Opinions 13 December 5th 05 07:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:25 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"