Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
LP inferior?
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 17:39:12 -0800, Arny Krueger wrote
(in article ): wrote in message On Dec 5, 7:25 pm, Steven Sullivan wrote: Except, it's never been demonstrated that 'hi rez CD' or SACD or DVD-A, intrinsically sound any different from Redbook CD, at normal listening levels. Such differences that can normally be heard between then, are more likely due to different mastering choices. Which may just reveal the limits of the current (non-verified for musical evaluation) penchant for using ABX for everything and declaring that it all sounds the same. There is no such thing as a penchant for using ABX for everything. A statement like this shows a considerable lack of familiarity with how proper subjective tests have been done since the middle 1990s. Interested parties are directed to ITU recommendation BS-1116 and other similar documents from international standards groups. I think that what hlavo meant was that if a difference is noted in an ABX test between an SACD/DVD-A mastering of a particular recording and the Redbook version of the same recording, it may be due to differences between the way the two versions were mastered rather than any actual difference between the sound of the encoding methodologies. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
phantom imaging-why digital is inferior to analog in end-use | Pro Audio | |||
Why duh-Mikey is an inferior being | Audio Opinions |