[George M. Middius]

The Idiot yammered:

The gay civil rights agenda based upon the argument
that gay people don't choose their sexual orientation.

It's not an argument, you imbecile. It's a fact. The lack of conclusive
scientific proof doesn't alter reality. An issue that is abstract and
"debatable" to plodding dolts like you is a known reality to half the human
race. The smart half, that is.

Any discussion to the contrary is shouted
down just as the President of Harvard was roundly criticized
for simply pointing out a fact re women.

One day, maybe you'll be able to express an idea without letting everybody
know how retarded you are. When you stop raging, you might want to update
the photo on your driver's license. The current one is dated:
http://shorterlink.co.uk/6633

And in case you need some inspiration, here's the member of your Idiots'
Club who hails from Oz:
http://shorterlink.co.uk/6632




--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[ScottW]

"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote in
message ...


The Idiot yammered:

The gay civil rights agenda based upon the argument
that gay people don't choose their sexual orientation.

It's not an argument, you imbecile. It's a fact. The lack of conclusive
scientific proof doesn't alter reality. An issue that is abstract and
"debatable" to plodding dolts like you is a known reality to half the human
race. The smart half, that is.

Any discussion to the contrary is shouted
down just as the President of Harvard was roundly criticized
for simply pointing out a fact re women.

One day, maybe you'll be able to express an idea without letting everybody
know how retarded you are. When you stop raging, you might want to update
the photo on your driver's license. The current one is dated:
http://shorterlink.co.uk/6633

And in case you need some inspiration, here's the member of your Idiots'
Club who hails from Oz:
http://shorterlink.co.uk/6632


Thanks for proving my point George.
Bigotry and prejudice have many forms, you're just
another one.

ScottW

[George M. Middius]

The Idiot blabbered:

One day, maybe you'll be able to express an idea without letting everybody
know how retarded you are. When you stop raging, you might want to update
the photo on your driver's license. The current one is dated:
http://shorterlink.co.uk/6633

And in case you need some inspiration, here's the member of your Idiots'
Club who hails from Oz:
http://shorterlink.co.uk/6632

Thanks for proving my point George.

Debating trade tacticks, noted, LOt"S.

Bigotry and prejudice have many forms, you're just
another one.

I'm a form of bigotry and prejudice? All by myself?




--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[George M. Middius]

Poopie brays in purported agony.

The Idiot yammered:

Oi ****head !

That's "oy", dimwit.

Stop cross-posting your idiot yamemring.

That's "idiotic yammering", numbnuts.

Do the rest of the toobies approve of you speaking for them? ;-)

BTW, has anybody kept count of how many sockpuppets Jute has used? I'm
asking mainly because I believe you need a more involving hobby than your
current one(s).





--

Krooscience: The antidote to education, experience, and excellence.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

Maybe toopid can logically 'prove' his 'point.'

My guess is that he'll run and hide... again.

Run, toopid, run!

ScottW wrote:
"George M. Middius" cmndr [underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote in

The Idiot yammered:

The gay civil rights agenda based upon the argument
that gay people don't choose their sexual orientation.

Bigotry and prejudice have many forms, you're just
another one.

LOL! And trains and trucks have many differing horsepower. And you're
just one of them.

Are you an apple or a turnip, toopid? Your cognitive abilities are
similar...

What agenda is that, Scott?

The gay civil rights agenda based upon the argument
that gay people don't choose their sexual orientation.

Well, toopid, let's flip over to your argument. Let's even assume that
your "some do, some don't" argument regarding whether or not people
choose to be gay. I now totally accept your point.

So now how do you reconcile giving civil rights to those who did NOT
choose to be gay, while denying rights to those who DID choose to be
gay? What 'test' should be necessary?

Or are you tangled up in your 'logic' again?

Answer the question!

LOL!

Moron.