Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Whats the best way to fit a .wav file to midi file?
I'm doing a transcription of an old big band recording using Cakewalk Pro
Audio 8. My plan is to have the wave file at the top and then piece together the band below it, following along with the recording. I want to make the wave file fit fairly precisely into the measures so I don't have to futz with the midi tracks later to make them line up. Tape decks being what they are and the original performance being done by humans, after a while it drifts off from the metronome beat. A way I've come up with is to find a tempo that fits for as long as possible, paste in the wave file and about a bar before it starts to drift noticeably, split the file, cut the portion of the file from that point on, insert a tempo change that fits - probably only a click or so one way or the other is all that's needed - repaste, and continue this process to the end of the recording. Is there a more elegant way of doing it than this? My source for the recording is an analog tape deck. Thanks for all input. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 10 Aug 2005 22:55:28 GMT, "Doc"
wrote: I'm doing a transcription of an old big band recording using Cakewalk Pro Audio 8. My plan is to have the wave file at the top and then piece together the band below it, following along with the recording. I want to make the wave file fit fairly precisely into the measures so I don't have to futz with the midi tracks later to make them line up. Tape decks being what they are and the original performance being done by humans, after a while it drifts off from the metronome beat. A way I've come up with is to find a tempo that fits for as long as possible, paste in the wave file and about a bar before it starts to drift noticeably, split the file, cut the portion of the file from that point on, insert a tempo change that fits - probably only a click or so one way or the other is all that's needed - repaste, and continue this process to the end of the recording. Is there a more elegant way of doing it than this? My source for the recording is an analog tape deck. The better MIDI/audio sequencers have a tempo map function. But question whether you NEED a tempo map. Jazz rhythms, above all, are better played than step-entered. Can't you play the parts in? Ignore bars and beats. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Hi,
You should change the rulers at the top of the screen to minutes and seconds and forget about trying to sync them up. If you really need midi, the tap tempo function in DP lets you tap in a conductor track on a keyboard. We did that once for some old John McCormac recordings. He's an Irish Temor, propably done straight to disc. Anyway, if you want to put the wav. in time with a strict midi tempo, Live by Ableton will let you put the track in time by using its "warp function" though it may be trick to do this to "Jazzier" timing without picking up a few artifacts on along the way. The most elegant way is probably to change the tempo to suit the song by playing in a conductor track. Enjoy... DS |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... The better MIDI/audio sequencers have a tempo map function. But question whether you NEED a tempo map. Jazz rhythms, above all, are better played than step-entered. Can't you play the parts in? Ignore bars and beats. There are several reasons this won't work. To begin with, when I get done, I want to be able to print out the individual parts to potentially be played by a live band. Other issues are that my keyboard skills aren't nearly good enough to play this stuff real time, but even if they were, I'm having to pick the parts out, often one note at a time. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"studiorat" wrote in message oups.com... The most elegant way is probably to change the tempo to suit the song by playing in a conductor track. What is a conductor track and how do you create/use it? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
If you want
You could try doing what I do Find a close tempo of the song and enter that. Now to get it exact with all the changing tempo-dynamics: Make sure you have project options/metronome enabled for playback-or you can just paste in quarter notes that will play in a midi trak-use this beat to sync to your audio trak. Then go to view/tempo- loop about 4 measures- select the draw tool and strategically draw in the tempo and correct where it drifts until it's on-continue til you're done and you'll have it exact. This is a tedious procedure but "exract timing" and any other ideas thrown at me either don't work because I'm not doing it right or it could be this dumb computer I have. good luck jeff "Doc" wrote in message nk.net... "Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... The better MIDI/audio sequencers have a tempo map function. But question whether you NEED a tempo map. Jazz rhythms, above all, are better played than step-entered. Can't you play the parts in? Ignore bars and beats. There are several reasons this won't work. To begin with, when I get done, I want to be able to print out the individual parts to potentially be played by a live band. Other issues are that my keyboard skills aren't nearly good enough to play this stuff real time, but even if they were, I'm having to pick the parts out, often one note at a time. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 10 Aug 2005 17:25:53 -0700, "studiorat" wrote:
We did that once for some old John McCormac recordings. He's an Irish Temor, propably done straight to disc. Do you think he REALLY sang through his nose like that? Or was he giving his full concert-hall volume into a recording horn and distorting somehow? I've never understood how a singer who made such a horrible sound was so popular :-) CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 02:09:20 GMT, "Doc"
wrote: The better MIDI/audio sequencers have a tempo map function. But question whether you NEED a tempo map. Jazz rhythms, above all, are better played than step-entered. Can't you play the parts in? Ignore bars and beats. There are several reasons this won't work. To begin with, when I get done, I want to be able to print out the individual parts to potentially be played by a live band. Other issues are that my keyboard skills aren't nearly good enough to play this stuff real time, but even if they were, I'm having to pick the parts out, often one note at a time. Well, OK. But I think you'd be better off developing your musical skills than your computer skills :-) CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 08:11:24 GMT, "jeff loven"
wrote: If you want You could try doing what I do Find a close tempo of the song and enter that. Now to get it exact with all the changing tempo-dynamics: Make sure you have project options/metronome enabled for playback-or you can just paste in quarter notes that will play in a midi trak-use this beat to sync to your audio trak. Then go to view/tempo- loop about 4 measures- select the draw tool and strategically draw in the tempo and correct where it drifts until it's on-continue til you're done and you'll have it exact. This is a tedious procedure but "exract timing" and any other ideas thrown at me either don't work because I'm not doing it right or it could be this dumb computer I have. And if you DO follow the tempo-track route, remember to turn it off , at least in the sections with no intended speed changes, before mixing the "performance" recording. Lurching tempos are not conducive to a good groove. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
On 8/10/05 6:55 PM, in article
t, "Doc" wrote: I'm doing a transcription of an old big band recording using Cakewalk Pro Audio 8. My plan is to have the wave file at the top and then piece together the band below it, following along with the recording. I want to make the wave file fit fairly precisely into the measures so I don't have to futz with the midi tracks later to make them line up. Tape decks being what they are and the original performance being done by humans, after a while it drifts off from the metronome beat. A way I've come up with is to find a tempo that fits for as long as possible, paste in the wave file and about a bar before it starts to drift noticeably, split the file, cut the portion of the file from that point on, insert a tempo change that fits - probably only a click or so one way or the other is all that's needed - repaste, and continue this process to the end of the recording. Is there a more elegant way of doing it than this? My source for the recording is an analog tape deck. Thanks for all input. I do this all the time, particularly on a long-term project. SMPTE and MIDI time Code are my friends. Earlier an 8-track analog deck and more recently a TASCAm DA88 system locked to (in my case) either SPMTE-TRACK PLATINUM on an ATARI ST or FREESTYLE on the Macs. I just have a bunch of songs working on the tape-based system and still use it out of confort and habit, luddite that I am... PERFORMER does all this inside the computer with a digital audio file and would work. As to tempo, most of the decent MIDI sequencers have a tempo-match feature where you can tap in a beat along with the guide recording and the system then makes a tempo-map that adjusts MIDI tempo from moment to moment along with the normal variations in the musical performance. It's pretty seamless and easier than fighting through it the way you're doing now. |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
I'd expect it was a little of both.
People liked him because of the songs he sang I'd say. You know the "Old bog road" an all that. My grandfather used to go and see him on a bandstand in a park in Dublin so he probably sang like that to try and make his voice travel. Good Byeeee- Good Byeee! |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
A conductor track is a ruler along the top of the screen in Protools, I
would think any other sequencer has a similar object with a similar name. Tempo track maybe? You should start looking at the metronome settings to find a way of entering the tempo via midi. I dont kow if you would be able to get it tight enough to quantize a whole track but it should be close enough to navigate the track and do cutting and pasting. That said I just remember cutting the file into musical parts and finding a tempo for each and then pushing and shoving the parts back together, but that was for a track made up by a DJ so the tempos were at least solid for each part. Anyway I do think tapping in the tempo and then tweeking it is the best route. Best of luck. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message news Well, OK. But I think you'd be better off developing your musical skills than your computer skills :-) Can you listen to a 1940's recording and pick out and play all parts with correct harmony and in correct voicing in real time in one shot? I think you'd be the only person on the planet who can, and no doubt have a few extra hands as well. Remember, I'm doing everything including drums and piano. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Are you planning on presenting the piece with the two versions mixed
together? , or are you just putting the wav file at the top for your own benefit whilst constructing it? When I used to do this, I just took the average tempo and created the parts as I heard them. I would have the wav file imported for ease in cueing, and go back and forth between the two for the neccessary parts. Any tempo changes that are needed in the score to add feeling, can be typed directly onto the score when formatting the printed pages. The rest is left to the conductor of the band to follow in his own way. If any of the band members needed to hear the original track I'd give them a copy of it together with a seperate recording of the MIDI version. They can then follow the score with either, depending on what is easiest for them. I didn't find any real need for matching the tempos exactly. It would be more bother than it's worth. -- Lynn Wobbly Music "Supporting the Mature Artist" ============================= http://www.wobblymusic.net Latest Release... "Friends" by John McKeon Order your copy now and get 2 FREE bonus tracks! http://www.johnmckeon.wobblymusic.net "Doc" wrote in message nk.net... I'm doing a transcription of an old big band recording using Cakewalk Pro Audio 8. My plan is to have the wave file at the top and then piece together the band below it, following along with the recording. I want to make the wave file fit fairly precisely into the measures so I don't have to futz with the midi tracks later to make them line up. Tape decks being what they are and the original performance being done by humans, after a while it drifts off from the metronome beat. A way I've come up with is to find a tempo that fits for as long as possible, paste in the wave file and about a bar before it starts to drift noticeably, split the file, cut the portion of the file from that point on, insert a tempo change that fits - probably only a click or so one way or the other is all that's needed - repaste, and continue this process to the end of the recording. Is there a more elegant way of doing it than this? My source for the recording is an analog tape deck. Thanks for all input. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Doc wrote:
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message news Well, OK. But I think you'd be better off developing your musical skills than your computer skills :-) Can you listen to a 1940's recording and pick out and play all parts with correct harmony and in correct voicing in real time in one shot? I think you'd be the only person on the planet who can, and no doubt have a few extra hands as well. Remember, I'm doing everything including drums and piano. I can't, but Fletcher Henderson could. He's dead now, so you can't hire him, though. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 15:06:39 GMT, "Doc"
wrote: Can you listen to a 1940's recording and pick out and play all parts with correct harmony and in correct voicing in real time in one shot? I think you'd be the only person on the planet who can, and no doubt have a few extra hands as well. Remember, I'm doing everything including drums and piano. Of course not. And I don't recall suggesting you did! But I can listen to it and transcribe the score. Then re-build the arrangement, playing each instrument separately. I usually find it is MUCH easier to play the phrasing I want than to step-enter then edit away the mechanical feel. Sometimes I play along with the original. One instrument at a time, of course, and in short sections with lots of trial-and-error. But less error as skills develop. If, ultimately, you decide a quantised drum track, say, would improve the performance, fine. Start over from that basis. Now you have the other parts written down (or in your head) you can easily reproduce them. CubaseFAQ www.laurencepayne.co.uk/CubaseFAQ.htm "Possibly the world's least impressive web site": George Perfect |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
"Laurence Payne" wrote in message ... Sometimes I play along with the original. One instrument at a time, of course, and in short sections with lots of trial-and-error. But less error as skills develop. If, ultimately, you decide a quantised drum track, say, would improve the performance, fine. Start over from that basis. Now you have the other parts written down (or in your head) you can easily reproduce them. Definitely doing a lot of trial and error. By the way, going through this process *is* improving my overall skills. First time I've ever transcriped a complete big band arrangement. Ultimately I want a score I can print out, so the notes have to be correct as to time value. It's understood among band members that you swing the chart. Eventually I also plan to record this with myself playing all the trumpet parts and using a homemade Soundfont bank with good samples, certain effects nuanced in - note bends etc. - should sound pretty close to the real deal. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
"Lynn" wrote in message ... Are you planning on presenting the piece with the two versions mixed together? , or are you just putting the wav file at the top for your own benefit whilst constructing it? For my own benefit. I didn't find any real need for matching the tempos exactly. It would be more bother than it's worth. Matching them up makes it easier to hear what I'm replicating. Then I can play them together or separately to hear how they compare. Then, when I'm done, I have an essentially finished score I can print. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Matching them up makes it easier to hear what I'm replicating. Then I can
play them together or separately to hear how they compare. Then, when I'm done, I have an essentially finished score I can print. Then probably the quickest way (if your software has a "tempo record" function) is to tap the beat in whilst listening to the track. This will record the "tempo map" of the original recording. You can then quantize your midi parts to the tempo map. -- Lynn Wobbly Music "Supporting the Mature Artist" ============================= http://www.wobblymusic.net Latest Release... "Friends" by John McKeon Order your copy now and get 2 FREE bonus tracks! http://www.johnmckeon.wobblymusic.net "Doc" wrote in message news "Lynn" wrote in message ... Are you planning on presenting the piece with the two versions mixed together? , or are you just putting the wav file at the top for your own benefit whilst constructing it? For my own benefit. I didn't find any real need for matching the tempos exactly. It would be more bother than it's worth. Matching them up makes it easier to hear what I'm replicating. Then I can play them together or separately to hear how they compare. Then, when I'm done, I have an essentially finished score I can print. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what are multi tracks wrt a MIDI file | Pro Audio | |||
How to save a midi file into .wav in Adobe Audition | Pro Audio | |||
Convert midi to an audio file | Pro Audio | |||
Voluntary Collective Licensing of Music File Sharing | Pro Audio | |||
MIDI question from Protools Newbie | Pro Audio |