Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Differential Amp Versus Instrumentation Amp
What's the difference?
-- Randy Yates % "Remember the good old 1980's, when Digital Signal Labs % things were so uncomplicated?" % 'Ticket To The Moon' http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % *Time*, Electric Light Orchestra |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Differential Amp Versus Instrumentation Amp
Randy Yates writes:
What's the difference? I should clarify my question to be, "For CMOS technology, what is the difference?". Wikipedia states: An instrumentation (or instrumentational) amplifier is a type of differential amplifier that has been outfitted with input buffers, which eliminate the need for input impedance matching... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumentation_amplifier) However, in CMOS technology, the exact same device type (PMOS or NMOS) is used for both inputs, and the input circuitry is mirror-image. So I don't see the need for "input impedance matching" in order to account for topology differences since there IS no topology difference for CMOS. There are imbalances between the "+" and "-" inputs due to process variance, load differences, etc., but I would think that this imbalance would be aggravated by using different amplifiers for each input. -- Randy Yates % "How's life on earth? Digital Signal Labs % ... What is it worth?" % 'Mission (A World Record)', http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % *A New World Record*, ELO |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.tech
|
|||
|
|||
Differential Amp Versus Instrumentation Amp
Randy Yates writes:
Randy Yates writes: What's the difference? I should clarify my question to be, "For CMOS technology, what is the difference?". Wikipedia states: An instrumentation (or instrumentational) amplifier is a type of differential amplifier that has been outfitted with input buffers, which eliminate the need for input impedance matching... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Instrumentation_amplifier) However, in CMOS technology, the exact same device type (PMOS or NMOS) is used for both inputs, and the input circuitry is mirror-image. So I don't see the need for "input impedance matching" in order to account for topology differences since there IS no topology difference for CMOS. There are imbalances between the "+" and "-" inputs due to process variance, load differences, etc., but I would think that this imbalance would be aggravated by using different amplifiers for each input. OK, I see my problem now. Interpretation. When W states "which eliminate the need for impedance matching" they don't mean impedance matching the opamp itself but the "amplifier," i.e., the opamp plus the resistors used to configure the opamp into a closed-loop (non-infinite-gain) differential configuration. This great article by Ron Mancini cleared it up for me: http://www.edn.com/article/CA207121.html -- Randy Yates % "Midnight, on the water... Digital Signal Labs % I saw... the ocean's daughter." % 'Can't Get It Out Of My Head' http://www.digitalsignallabs.com % *El Dorado*, Electric Light Orchestra |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Diamond Cut DC6 versus Adobe Audition versus GoldWave | Tech | |||
INA103 differential stage | Pro Audio | |||
Schematic differential tubes? | Vacuum Tubes | |||
Constant current source for differential amp | Vacuum Tubes | |||
More on differential phase distortion | Vacuum Tubes |