Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
So-called high rez audio downloads debunked - again!
Audio Empire wrote:
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012 19:05:30 -0700, Dick Pierce wrote (in article ): the early ones (1967-1971) were biased so far into class "B" that they exhibited a very apparent crossover notch distortion. To be technically accurate, Class B operation is not a region or continuum, it is a very specific bias point where the conduction angle is exactly 180 degrees. Pushing it further than that is not "so far into class B", it's into class C operation. To be fair, I think that most of us know that. I don't know that "most of us know that," and, unless you've done the survey, I suspect that you don't either. If past posts in this and other newsgroups over the years is any indication, then there is in fact, a significant portion of the high-end audio readership that does NOT know that. It is to them, as one audience, that my reply was directed. Further, your statement "biased so far into class 'B'" seems to imply the assumption that class B is not a boundary, but a region. Let's take the same grammar but in a slightly different context: "I never did understand was why my friend drove so far into the border between the USA and Canada that he exhibited a very apparent 'eh' at the end of each sentence, eh?" Unless the asumption is the border between the USA and Canada is a region and not a line, it;s really difficult to imagine driving "so far into the border." He's either in the USA, or he's in Canada, or has one set of wheels in one and the other. The issue of technical accuracy is important, not to the "most of us that know," but to the many that don't. I don't know how many myths and half-truths take on a life of their own when bystanders to a technical discussion see terminology bandied about willy-nilly by "most of us that know," with the assumption that, well, "most of us know." Actually, in the high-end world, there are those that would say most forcefully, that "most of us know" that cables make enormous differences, that "most of us know" that digital can't possibly capture analog waveforms because of stuff 'missing between the samples," that "most of us know" that the output of a CD player MUST look like a staircase, that "most of us know" a whole nunch of things that simply aren't so. You might assume, reasonably or otherwise, that "most of us know" something. I, on the other hand, don't think it's necessarily either a good idea or of service to those, even if it's but a single person, who aren't "most of us." And, by the way, which "us" are you talking about? -- +--------------------------------+ + Dick Pierce | + Professional Audio Development | +--------------------------------+ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Much So-Called Digital Ringing Debunked | High End Audio | |||
Downloads home · Trial downloads · Updates · Exchange · | Pro Audio | |||
High - end downloads wma -> dvd-A | High End Audio | |||
McCarty BULLSHIT debunked - affidavits on file | Marketplace | |||
Free MANUAL downloads Vintage Audio Radio | Vacuum Tubes |