Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
On 22/01/2018 19:53, Scott Dorsey wrote:
The nice thing about living in the digital world, though, is that you can do it at any point in the process and it works the same way. Not to mention that if it doesn't work, you're always still at generation one in the chain for quality when you try again. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#42
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
John Williamson wrote:
On 22/01/2018 19:53, Scott Dorsey wrote: The nice thing about living in the digital world, though, is that you can do it at any point in the process and it works the same way. Not to mention that if it doesn't work, you're always still at generation one in the chain for quality when you try again. Yes, although the downside of that is that you can be caught ino the trap of spending months trying different things to get it perfect, when it was originally almost perfect. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#43
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
On Wednesday, January 17, 2018 at 3:32:10 PM UTC-6, Scott Dorsey wrote:
I don't understand the reluctance by so many people today to just use an amp in a room. In the case of apartment dwellers, it's not necessarily practical. However, I also think a number of guitarists are bewitched by the variety and convenience of modern amp modelers. Personally, I was impressed with the Kemper. |
#44
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
On 14-01-2018 21:03, James Price wrote:
On Sunday, January 14, 2018 at 10:13:18 AM UTC-6, Scott Dorsey wrote: The secret is in the amp and in the room. If it sounds big and full in the room, that's half the struggle. I like to put something like a 635A that has no low end on the amp, then if possible (given leakage considerations) a mike five or ten feet away so that you get some room sound. The room mike is going to be boomy, and will have a sustain from the room sound. The amp mike will have a bright but sharp sound that compensates for the boom. & more wisdom Thanks for the suggestion. This particular individual is attached to going direct with an Axe FX II rather than mic'ing up an amp, namely because the preset they use has 'their sound'. Probably, but wants to sound louder and punchier. So to Scotts wise words I will add: use an open back amplifier, set it at an angle to a rear wall and use a stereophonic version of the close and far microphone setup ploy. Since the Axe FX is primarily used to record direct, any room sound would have to be artificially created. Hardly ideal, but options are limited. Yes, they are, musician needs to follow advice to get larger and punchier sound. Kind regards Peter Larsen |
#45
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
You don't have to use amp sims any more, at least not with VST. There is a free convolution VST - PULSE by Rosen Digital Audio - and you load up an impulse response of your favorite amp and go. I bought a Kemper Profiler which "profiles" the sound coming from a mic in front of an amp. They are REALLY, REALLY accurate. There are tons of A?B comparisons to judge for yourself. It ain't cheap at $1700, but I haven't mic'ed an AMP since it arrived last spring. Many of the Michael Britt profiles are free with it...Stunning. And it had bass amp profiles, and dozens of pedals, CRAZY. Where it departs from amp sims are in the clean sounds.. They have the depth and chime of real amps. The sounds are taken from real amps/ |
#46
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
|
#47
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
|
#48
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
Does arrangement count? Like having
strong but well-spaced jabs at the strings? Listen to first 30sec of 'Long Cool Woman(In A Black Dress)' as example. |
#49
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
So, what is the difference between the profiles that the Kemper uses and the impulse response samples used in convolution reverbs? I don't really know the science behind it. Profiles are made by micing up your amp and having the profiler profile it....it plugs into the amp input and plays various sounds and measures what the amp/mic are doing to those sounds. Is that the same as convolution? Sounds similar |
#50
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
|
#51
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
|
#52
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
"Les Cargill" wrote in message news
It could just be creating multiple convolutions and presenting a mix of those. I am quite sure that they ain't saying There's a lot more than convolution going on, because that can only model the LTI characteristics. There are a wide variety of DSP blocks that they use, including compressors, limiters, distortion generators, clippers, gates, and of course, convolvers. They're modeling both linear and non-linear characteristics. |
#53
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
wrote:
=20 So, what is the difference between the profiles that the Kemper uses=20 and the impulse response samples used in convolution reverbs? I don't really know the science behind it. Profiles are made by micing up = your amp and having the profiler profile it....it plugs into the amp input = and plays various sounds and measures what the amp/mic are doing to those s= ounds. Is that the same as convolution? Sounds similar There are good and bad ways to do it. Doing room impulses is easy because the room is linear... no matter what the level is, it behaves the same way (even if, due to your ear being nonlinear, it may not always seem that way in reality). Guitar amps aren't like that, they have tonal changes with level. There are ways to model that with Volterra kernels and some people have done that. Unfortunately you get a lot of latency with such things. And validating the system is very very hard. It just seems an awful lot of work to me, when you could just set a Champ up in a corner and listen to it. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#55
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 8:32:05 PM UTC-6, Nil wrote:
On 30 Jan 2018, Nil wrote in rec.audio.pro: So, what is the difference between the profiles that the Kemper uses and the impulse response samples used in convolution reverbs? In addition to capturing the IR, a profile also captures the nonlinear behavior of an amp by analyzing a series of tones that the Kemper sends into it. |
#56
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
On Thursday, February 1, 2018 at 7:39:44 AM UTC-6, Scott Dorsey wrote:
tompauleast wrote: =20 So, what is the difference between the profiles that the Kemper uses=20 and the impulse response samples used in convolution reverbs? I don't really know the science behind it. Profiles are made by micing up = your amp and having the profiler profile it....it plugs into the amp input = and plays various sounds and measures what the amp/mic are doing to those s= ounds. Is that the same as convolution? Sounds similar There are good and bad ways to do it. Doing room impulses is easy because the room is linear... no matter what the level is, it behaves the same way (even if, due to your ear being nonlinear, it may not always seem that way in reality). Guitar amps aren't like that, they have tonal changes with level. There are ways to model that with Volterra kernels and some people have done that. Unfortunately you get a lot of latency with such things. And validating the system is very very hard. It just seems an awful lot of work to me, when you could just set a Champ up in a corner and listen to it. In my opinion, one advantage of the Kemper is continuity. If you want or need to do a punch in a week after a session for whatever reason, you can reproduce the exact same tone easily. |
#57
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
James Price wrote:
In my opinion, one advantage of the Kemper is continuity. If you want or need to do a punch in a week after a session for whatever reason, you can reproduce the exact same tone easily. Now THAT is the most reasonable thing anyone has ever said in favor of modelling. It's not enough to sell me on the idea, but it makes very good sense. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#58
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
On 3/02/2018 7:34 AM, James Price wrote:
On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 8:32:05 PM UTC-6, Nil wrote: On 30 Jan 2018, Nil wrote in rec.audio.pro: So, what is the difference between the profiles that the Kemper uses and the impulse response samples used in convolution reverbs? In addition to capturing the IR, a profile also captures the nonlinear behavior of an amp by analyzing a series of tones that the Kemper sends into it. Hopefully with the user making a huge number of changes to the input gain, tone, and master gains of that amp . Unless it's just a few specific sounds of that amp being modeled ... geoff |
#59
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Getting more punch from heavily distorted guitars?
On Friday, February 2, 2018 at 3:54:38 PM UTC-6, geoff wrote:
On 3/02/2018 7:34 AM, James Price wrote: On Tuesday, January 30, 2018 at 8:32:05 PM UTC-6, Nil wrote: On 30 Jan 2018, Nil wrote in rec.audio.pro: So, what is the difference between the profiles that the Kemper uses and the impulse response samples used in convolution reverbs? In addition to capturing the IR, a profile also captures the nonlinear behavior of an amp by analyzing a series of tones that the Kemper sends into it. Hopefully with the user making a huge number of changes to the input gain, tone, and master gains of that amp . Unless it's just a few specific sounds of that amp being modeled ... A profile is basically a snapshot of an amp at whatever settings the amp is profiled at. There are tone controls, however they don't conform to the sound of the original amp beyond a very limited range. For that reason, users often create multiple profiles of an amp at various settings. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DI Box distorted through amp | Pro Audio | |||
NAD amp distorting heavily after running a bass guitar through it. | High End Audio | |||
NAD amp distorting heavily after running a bass guitar through it. | Tech | |||
NAD amp distorting heavily after running a bass guitar through it. | Audio Opinions | |||
NAD amp distorting heavily after running a bass guitar through it. | General |