Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
"George M. Middius" wrote in
message Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Tell us about it Middiot, using yourself as an example. Also if you have any balls at all, you'll give us the name of your alma mater and when you graduated. |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Mr. **** engages his hair-trigger Defensive Overreacting Reflux. Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Tell us about it [my supreme master], using yourself as an example. You can relax, Turdbucket. This troll wasn't aimed at you. For future reference, Kroo-trolls always feature a reference either to your mental infirmity or to your compulsive lying. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 17, 11:50*am, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in messagenews:cm2u2413qvk4ks8v476jt0cvitd0o902ba@4ax .com Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Tell us about it Middiot, using yourself as an example. Also if you have any balls at all, you'll give us the name of your alma mater and when you graduated. George does not sound like an ignorant hick, GOIA. Therefore your question is about as valid as most things you post, which is to say "not very". |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 17, 2:16*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 17, 9:42*am, George M. Middius wrote: Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Nah, it's for more valuable to be a rent-boy abusing shut-in ward of the state with an obvious fraudulent elitist ego. So you agree that you sound like an ignorant hick, and that it isn't very valuable. For once we can agree on something. |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Shhhh! said: George does not sound like an ignorant hick, GOIA. Therefore your question is about as valid as most things you post, which is to say "not very". Arnii has to pop out of his clock periodically in order to squawk irrationally. If he doesn't, his spring gets coiled too tight, and he looses a ****storm in his basement. |
#7
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Shhhh! said: Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Nah, it's for more valuable to be a rent-boy abusing shut-in ward of the state with an obvious fraudulent elitist ego. So you agree that you sound like an ignorant hick, and that it isn't very valuable. For once we can agree on something. Are you jealous of my "fraudulent ego"? I'm thinking of upgrading to a real ego, but I'd rather pay extra taxes to take care of poor people. |
#8
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 17, 3:20*pm, George M. Middius
wrote: Shhhh! said: Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Nah, it's for more valuable to be a rent-boy abusing shut-in ward of the state with an obvious fraudulent elitist ego. So you agree that you sound like an ignorant hick, and that it isn't very valuable. For once we can agree on something. Are you jealous of my "fraudulent ego"? I'm thinking of upgrading to a real ego, but I'd rather pay extra taxes to take care of poor people. Is this the "real" George, or the "fraudulent" George? The "fraudulent" George is so "obvious" that it's "absurd". (I've been missing the hilarious irony of 2pid calling things "absurd". It used to happen so regularly. Is it possible that a small beam of self-perception has cracked the thick plate of Impervium that surrounds 2pid's skull?) |
#9
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
"George M. Middius" wrote in
message Mr. **** engages his hair-trigger Defensive Overreacting Reflux. Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Tell us about it Middiot, using yourself as an example. Also if you have any balls at all, you'll give us the name of your alma mater and when you graduated.. Middiot last seen crouched in a corner in a fetal position. |
#10
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? **It would seem so. US voters placed a drug addicted moron in the highest office in the land. They had a choice between the drug addicted moron and a well qualified and intelligent man. It seems American voters prefer idiots. Trevor Wilson |
#11
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Shhhh! said: Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Nah, it's for more valuable to be a rent-boy abusing shut-in ward of the state with an obvious fraudulent elitist ego. So you agree that you sound like an ignorant hick, and that it isn't very valuable. For once we can agree on something. Are you jealous of my "fraudulent ego"? I'm thinking of upgrading to a real ego, but I'd rather pay extra taxes to take care of poor people. Is this the "real" George, or the "fraudulent" George? The "fraudulent" George is so "obvious" that it's "absurd". (I've been missing the hilarious irony of 2pid calling things "absurd". It used to happen so regularly. Is it possible that a small beam of self-perception has cracked the thick plate of Impervium that surrounds 2pid's skull?) Good question, although it's absurd enough not to warrant answer. Even so, turns out there's an acid test for absurditivity. You ask the absurdroid in question whether the Apollo astronauts really got to the Moon. (The alternative explanation for the evidence presented by NASA is that it was all a hoax perpetrated by Big Brother in order to bolster anti-Soviet propaganda.) After Scottie answers this question, I'll provide a link on how to interpret the answer. |
#12
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Trevor Wilson said: Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? **It would seem so. US voters placed a drug addicted moron in the highest office in the land. They had a choice between the drug addicted moron and a well qualified and intelligent man. It seems American voters prefer idiots. Are you forgetting that the 2000 election was stolen? |
#13
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 17, 4:25*pm, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% Go 50,999,897 48.38% |
#14
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 17, 4:17*pm, "Arny Krueger" wrote:
"George M. Middius" wrote in messagenews:jg8u249ehqkmfd98isusmo3o4logti4u63@4ax .com Mr. **** engages his hair-trigger Defensive Overreacting Reflux. Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? Tell us about it Middiot, using yourself as an example. Also if you have any balls at all, you'll give us the name of your alma mater and when you graduated.. Middiot last seen crouched in a corner in a fetal position. People laugh at you in all sorts of positions, GOIA. I often laugh at you while taking a dump. "There goes another one evading GOIA's collection," I say. ;-) |
#15
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On Sun, 18 May 2008 07:25:46 +1000, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message .. . Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? **It would seem so. US voters placed a drug addicted moron in the highest office in the land. trevorboy!!! Still passing gas through your mouth. They had a choice between the drug addicted moron and a well qualified and intelligent man. Yep - and that 's who they elected It seems American voters prefer idiots. LOL Such a bigot...... Trevor Wilson |
#16
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On Sat, 17 May 2008 16:11:54 -0700 (PDT), "Shhhh! I'm Listening to
Reason!" wrote: On May 17, 4:25*pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% Go 50,999,897 48.38% Ouch - that really slapped poor little trevor..... |
#17
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ... On May 17, 4:25 pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% Go 50,999,897 48.38% **Oops. *Only* fractionally less than half the US voting population prefer a moron in the White House. Trevor Wilson |
#18
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Trevor Wilson said: Is there any conceivable value in sounding like an ignorant hick even though you've got a full B.S. degree from an accredited U.S. university? **It would seem so. US voters placed a drug addicted moron in the highest office in the land. They had a choice between the drug addicted moron and a well qualified and intelligent man. It seems American voters prefer idiots. Are you forgetting that the 2000 election was stolen? **I stand corrected. *Only slightly less than half the US voting population prefers a moron in the White House. Trevor Wilson |
#19
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On Sun, 18 May 2008 13:52:43 +1000, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote: "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote in message ... On May 17, 4:25 pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% Go 50,999,897 48.38% **Oops. *Only* fractionally less than half the US voting population prefer a moron in the White House. LOL As usual, you still miss the target. I'll help you clarify: The right man is in the White House..... Trevor Wilson The bigot |
#20
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Scottie's little brother yapped: I'll help you clarify: The right man is in the White House..... You're trailing off. Is that because you're lost in a beatific reverie about how much better off the country is today than it was in 2000? |
#21
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
"George M. Middius" wrote in message ... Scottie's little brother yapped: I'll help you clarify: The right man is in the White House..... You're trailing off. Is that because you're lost in a beatific reverie about how much better off the country is today than it was in 2000? **Ozarkmoron is a believer in the supernatural. That explains it's preference for that drug-taking moron, you guys call the President. Trevor Wilson |
#22
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On 17 Mai, 19:11, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On May 17, 4:25*pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% *Go 50,999,897 48.38% So, you don't believe in adhering to the Constitution. |
#23
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On Sun, 18 May 2008 00:18:00 -0400, George M. Middius
wrote: Scottie's little brother yapped: I'll help you clarify: The right man is in the White House..... You're trailing off. Is that because you're lost in a beatific reverie about how much better off the country is today than it was in 2000? Haven't had a terrorist attack in our country since 9/11. And the country is doing just fine, thank you. |
#24
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On Sun, 18 May 2008 14:34:39 +1000, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote: "George M. Middius" wrote in message .. . Scottie's little brother yapped: I'll help you clarify: The right man is in the White House..... You're trailing off. Is that because you're lost in a beatific reverie about how much better off the country is today than it was in 2000? **Ozarkmoron is a believer in the supernatural. LOL That is a pretty tired lie there trevorboy. Got any substance to back it up? As usual, of course not..... That explains it's preference for that drug-taking moron, you guys call the President. And what will you say if Obama is elected? You are truly pathetic..... Trevor Wilson |
#25
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Clyde Slick said: So, you don't believe in adhering to the Constitution. Ironic to hear that from you, RAO's biggest Bushie-apologist. |
#26
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On 18 Mai, 10:07, George M. Middius wrote:
Clyde Slick said: So, you don't believe in adhering to the Constitution. Ironic to hear that from you, RAO's biggest Bushie-apologist. LOL! I only apologized for the mispronounciations, and my own typso, of course!!! |
#27
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 18, 1:02*am, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 17 Mai, 19:11, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On May 17, 4:25*pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% *Go 50,999,897 48.38% So, you don't believe in adhering to the Constitution. What has that got to do with the statement at hand? "It seems American voters prefer idiots." The Electoral College and the Supreme Court may prefer idiots, but not the American voter. |
#28
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On 18 Mai, 14:21, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On May 18, 1:02*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On 17 Mai, 19:11, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On May 17, 4:25*pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% *Go 50,999,897 48.38% So, you don't believe in adhering to the Constitution. What has that got to do with the statement at hand? "It seems American voters prefer idiots." The Electoral College and the Supreme Court may prefer idiots, but not the American voter.- There ';preference' related to the method of choice and the implementation of that method, not to the type of person. You are samrt ennought to know that, I think. And I think you are smart enough to argue your own point of view on those isues. I don't know why you are stooping to stoopidity. |
#29
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 18, 1:42*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 18 Mai, 14:21, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On May 18, 1:02*am, Clyde Slick wrote: On 17 Mai, 19:11, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On May 17, 4:25*pm, "Trevor Wilson" wrote: It seems American voters prefer idiots. I'd suggest you check results of the 2000 *popular* vote. You'll see the error of your conclusion. He Bush: 50,456,002 47.87% *Go 50,999,897 48.38% So, you don't believe in adhering to the Constitution. What has that got to do with the statement at hand? "It seems American voters prefer idiots." The Electoral College and the Supreme Court may prefer idiots, but not the American voter. There ';preference' related to the method of choice and the implementation of that method, not to the type of person. bushie is an idiot, but that wasn't the point. I'm not arguing that bushie was selected unconstitutionally, or that it wasn't fair, even though both could be and have been argued. What is clear is that a majority of American voters did not want him. Hence, Trevor's original comment is wrong, which is all that I said. Perhaps placing "idiots" in quotes would've helped you. You are samrt ennought to know that, I think. And I think you are smart enough to argue your own point of view on those isues. I don't know why you are stooping to stoopidity. Is it "stupid" to say that a majority of American voters did not select bushie? That is all that I said. Here, argue this one (with yourself): "bushie won the 2000 election due to the Electoral College and the Supreme Court, *not* due to winning a majority of the popular vote." Have fun. |
#30
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On 18 Mai, 15:04, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: "bushie won the 2000 election due to the Electoral College So did all the other presidents thats how we do it. |
#31
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
Clyde Slick said: "bushie won the 2000 election due to the Electoral College So did all the other presidents thats how we do it. Stoopidity aside, it was refreshing to hear duh-Scottie finally offer up some criticism of Dumbya. I thought it would never happen, but it did. It was a benchmark of perversity, albeit one that could be topped if A. Krooger were to admit people insult and demean him because of his own behavior. |
#32
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
Hypothetical question
On May 18, 4:23*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 18 Mai, 15:04, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: "bushie won the 2000 election due to the Electoral College So did all the other presidents thats how we do it. Which is not, of course, the point. But nice deviation from the topic. Trevor said "the American voters wanted bushie". They did not, as a majority vote showed. As I said, I am not arguing voting law, the Constitution, or the reasoning behind the archaic Electoral College. I was simply rebutting Trevor's point. Are you arguing that the "American voters wanted bushie" because he won more Electoral College votes and won a Supreme Court decision, but lost the popular vote? That would be an "absurd" position. LOL! More American voters in 2000 did *not* want bushie than did. Period. Therefore Trevor's point was wrong. You may continue this discussion alone, Clyde. :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hypothetical Dilema | Pro Audio | |||
question about live shows (the band simple minds) and unrelated audio question | Tech |