William,
Do you still have the soundfield mike for sale? I have no valid email
for you.

Bob Morein

No, it was sold back in 2004 to keep me from losing my home.

I don't know why you weren't able to get me with "reply to sender".

"Robert Morein" wrote in message
...
William,
Do you still have the soundfield mike for sale? I have no valid email

wrote in message
oups.com...

William Sommerwerck wrote:

No, it was sold back in 2004 to keep me from losing my home.

I don't know why you weren't able to get me with "reply to sender".


Let me apologize for our mutual friend "Robert Morein", (aka "The
Starmaker"), is kind of new to this "usenet" thing. He hasn't quite
mastered "Reply to sender" yet.

Why thanks, Dr. Graham. You're such a helpful bro.

Your bro,
SHP

"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message
...
No, it was sold back in 2004 to keep me from losing my home.

I don't know why you weren't able to get me with "reply to sender".

It bounced.
What is your general impression? Do I recall some complaint about self-noise
that marred this otherwise marvelous concept?

It bounced.

That's odd. Oh, well.


What is your general impression? Do I recall some complaint about
self-noise that marred this otherwise marvelous concept?

No, my gripe was that the sound was somewhat dark and grundgy.

"William Sommerwerck" wrote in message
...
It bounced.

That's odd. Oh, well.


What is your general impression? Do I recall some complaint about
self-noise that marred this otherwise marvelous concept?

No, my gripe was that the sound was somewhat dark and grundgy.

Uggh. What do you know of the capsule design?

No, my gripe was that the sound was somewhat dark and grundgy.

Uggh. What do you know of the capsule design?

Nothing.