Here are some links to comments on Mr. Jute and how well respected he is by
people on usenet groups that have dealt with him in the past.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9d82364fc72349

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...d48cb4d78339d3

Did someone ask you to jump up in defense of Arny? What the hell, Mike?
Arny may know a little bit about a lot of different things. He's still an
asshole that has never admitted to being wrong about anything. Why
would you want to associate with him?


wrote in message
k.net...
Here are some links to comments on Mr. Jute and how well respected he is
by people on usenet groups that have dealt with him in the past.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9d82364fc72349

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...d48cb4d78339d3

I wouldn't worry overly much about Nyobe, Queen of Ignorance, the one
whose 'nane' used to be Mike McKelvey. She's just in a snit about
failing to pass the entrance exam to become a rat in my online
laboratory; even laboratory rats need a certain minimum of
intelligence. Now she thinks Arny will have have if she shoves her nose
far enough up his fundament. Nyobe's a ****mat for every strong
personality on the net but basically harmless.

"Get some background" -- I fell off my chair laughing when i noticed
the name poor Niobe/Mikey gave her silly attack thread. Here is the
background that poor Mikey didn't get:

The article she quotes is by a manufacturer, one Michael LaFevre of
Magnequest Transformers, Philadelphia, who was disappointed in a review
I gave his shoddy products in Glass Audio, trying to intimidate me into
giving him better reviews. For that assault on free speech, which
lasted several years until I lost patience, I destroyed LaFevre's
reputation and three-quarters of his business (and I didn't put him in
the gutter only because he had two small children), and not a single
voice (outside his own gang) was raised in LaFevre's defense. Instead
people in the trade congratulated me on a public service. Poor McKelvey
is such a stumblebum, he didn't find this out before he waved his slack
ass in the air and embarrassed himself yet again. And the irony is
that I have several times warned Nyobe Mike that the lackadaisical
quality of his research, almost but not quite as slack as
Pinkostinko's, will drop him in the **** with friend and foe alike.

Mind you, if Nyobe/McKelvey is so thick as to spring to the defence of
a demonstrable liar and fool like Krueger, she's got everything coming
that she will get in the months and years to come. Whatta macaroon she
is!

Nothing personal, Nyobe, just business. If you want to spread filth and
disease and ignorance liike a cockroach, you should expect to be
stepped on like a cockroach.

Andre Jute

surf wrote:
Did someone ask you to jump up in defense of Arny? What the hell, Mike?
Arny may know a little bit about a lot of different things. He's still an
asshole that has never admitted to being wrong about anything. Why
would you want to associate with him?


wrote in message
k.net...
Here are some links to comments on Mr. Jute and how well respected he is
by people on usenet groups that have dealt with him in the past.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...9d82364fc72349

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.u...d48cb4d78339d3

wrote:
snip

The article she quotes is by a manufacturer, one Michael LaFevre of
Magnequest Transformers, Philadelphia, who was disappointed in a review
I gave his shoddy products in Glass Audio, trying to intimidate me into
giving him better reviews. For that assault on free speech, which
lasted several years until I lost patience, I destroyed LaFevre's
reputation and three-quarters of his business (and I didn't put him in
the gutter only because he had two small children), and not a single
voice (outside his own gang) was raised in LaFevre's defense. Instead
people in the trade congratulated me on a public service.

Andrew had little to do with Magnequeef's fall: by then we had all
pretty much pegged Mike Lefevre as a fraud, an idiot, and a raging
hard-on.

Brat Ludwig wrote:
wrote:
snip

The article she quotes is by a manufacturer, one Michael LaFevre of
Magnequest Transformers, Philadelphia, who was disappointed in a review
I gave his shoddy products in Glass Audio, trying to intimidate me into
giving him better reviews. For that assault on free speech, which
lasted several years until I lost patience, I destroyed LaFevre's
reputation and three-quarters of his business (and I didn't put him in
the gutter only because he had two small children), and not a single
voice (outside his own gang) was raised in LaFevre's defense. Instead
people in the trade congratulated me on a public service.

Andrew had little to do with Magnequeef's fall: by then we had all
pretty much pegged Mike Lefevre as a fraud, an idiot, and a raging
hard-on.

Anyone remember seeing Ludwig on the ramparts?

I thought not. I certainly don't even remember Ludwig being there,
never mind standing shoulder to shoulder with John Byrns and me, who
did between us did 99.9 per cent of the work.

This isn't even subtle, Ludwig: you all saw the light reveal the
Magnequest shortcomings because I shone the light on LaFevre and and
his products and his gang.

You're not doing yourself any favours, Ludwig.

Andre Jute

Andre Jute wrote:
snip
I thought not. I certainly don't even remember Ludwig being there,
never mind standing shoulder to shoulder with John Byrns and me, who
did between us did 99.9 per cent of the work.

This isn't even subtle, Ludwig: you all saw the light reveal the
Magnequest shortcomings because I shone the light on LaFevre and and
his products and his gang.

You're not doing yourself any favours, Ludwig.

IIRC this whole thing with Magnequeef was a year and a half or two
years after MQ started out. I first became aware of MQ from one of the
several early basement triode zines, called him up, and asked him if he
could do something really simple. As I recall the conversation he knew
less than I did about some aspects of transformer design and that was
not a lot, and it was apparent he was a yuppie that smelled financial
peg boy butt, and maybe the other kind too. I read his articles which
were half true and half self-servng bull****, and finally dismissed him
as a ****-up and a ripoff artist and an arrogant one to boot. The name
Andre Jute was then known to me only in conjunction with his
car-building book which I then had a favorable opinion of, naive me,
even though I vaguely detected the odor of scholarship where experience
with a welding torch was needed.

Later conversations with people who had dealt with MQ convinced me
first impressions were so right. Turns out the silly ******* bought a
lot of prints from a dumpster diving former employee and got the unused
trademarks transferred to himself, and in reality had no legitimate
experience
whatever. What products he builds are no better than what any hobbyist
could do after reading the RDH 4 and Eric Lowdon's book-and maybe
spending a little time as a minimum wage employee in an actual
transformer plant, letting someone else teach you to run a Universal
winder. The difficult ones he has never actually made although he has
said he did. It's called lying.

Bret Ludwig said:

Andrew had little to do with Magnequeef's fall: by then we had all
pretty much pegged Mike Lefevre as a fraud, an idiot, and a raging
hard-on.

I'm sure you have several pairs of his cast-off undies.

nyob123, " lover of abx/dbt", wrote



Here are some links to comments on Mr. Jute and how well respected he is by
people on usenet groups that have dealt with him in the past.




Shut the **** up McKelvy, you sick ****.

I've dealt with you (and Pinkerton... etc) you're a sad sack, spineless,
gutless, boneless, creme of the crop wimpy sisssssy boy so
addicted into tucking his tail between the legs. Gettda **** off
this thread.



Any problem ?



I mean, do we have a problem with this ?

On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:31:46 GMT, "EddieM"
wrote:

Any problem ?

I'm pretty sure your problem in that the people you mentioned have
spanked you hard on repeated occasions. So, humiliated, you choose
the route of fact-free attacks, embarrassing yourself even more in the
process.

dizzy wrote
EddieM wrote:




Any problem ?

I'm pretty sure your problem in that the people you mentioned have
spanked you hard on repeated occasions.


Is there a way you could demonstrate a sample of this ?

Apparently, one of the guys ( McKelvy) whom you thought had
spanked me isn't here to help out. You said you're pretty sure
right?

So, humiliated, you choose
the route of fact-free attacks, embarrassing yourself even more in the
process.


These are all BS talk from you Dizzy. Be a man and Tell me what you
want, do you want to share your opinion among many previous
discussion I had with McKelvy ? It can easily be pasted including
the last recent one if I recall. Stop all these nonsense from you about
me being humiliated. Be a man and tell me you have no "tail" to hide.
So far all you are is yak.

I'm all ears, it Sunday afternoon and I will wait and make time for you.


---


The ball is in your court...

On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:50:18 GMT, "EddieM"
wrote:

dizzy wrote
EddieM wrote:

Any problem ?

I'm pretty sure your problem in that the people you mentioned have
spanked you hard on repeated occasions.

Is there a way you could demonstrate a sample of this ?

Yeah, I'm going to spend my time researching the issue and presenting
facts, in response to a tirade (conspicuously devoid of facts) from a
cretin like you.

I'm just going by what you've written in this thread, which is strong
evidence that you have been spanked long and hard, so you are
lashing-out in frustration.

So, humiliated, you choose
the route of fact-free attacks, embarrassing yourself even more in the
process.

I think that's enough feeding the troll for now.

dizzy wrote
EddieM wrote:
dizzy wrote
EddieM wrote:




Any problem ?

I'm pretty sure your problem in that the people you mentioned have
spanked you hard on repeated occasions.

Is there a way you could demonstrate a sample of this ?

Yeah, I'm going to spend my time researching the issue and presenting
facts, in response to a tirade (conspicuously devoid of facts) from a
cretin like you.


You retarded or something? You said you're petty sure that I was
spanked but you can't provide evidence to back that one up.

Now, could you tell me an example of what I had said above that
you believe is devoid of facts? You talk the talk but can you walk
the walk?


I'm just going by what you've written in this thread, which is strong
evidence that you have been spanked long and hard, so you are
lashing-out in frustration.

Listen you stupefied orang-utan, where is this evidence about me
being spanked long and hard?


So, humiliated, you choose the route of fact-free attacks,
embarrassing yourself even more in the process.

I think that's enough feeding the troll for now.


Where is your sample of me being humiliated and embarrass in the
process, where is this fact-free attacks that you're talkin about
you insensible Nutball.

You're just another gutless wonder who like to pluck your own version
of facts out of your ass.

"dizzy" wrote
EddieM wrote:






Any problem ?

I'm pretty sure your problem in that the people you





Actually, my problem right this moment is to figure out whether if
at one time you felt yourself to be none other than Bozo the Clown
with a magnificent tail and decided to spend a good part of the day
goin round and round in your listening room chasing the said tail...

..... 'till you got so exhausted and got the idea of calling yourself
"dizzy" from then on. (Just a hunch)


Any thought on this?

"dizzy" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 18:31:46 GMT, "EddieM"
wrote:

Any problem ?

I'm pretty sure your problem in that the people you mentioned have
spanked you hard on repeated occasions. So, humiliated, you choose
the route of fact-free attacks, embarrassing yourself even more in the
process.

Eddie doesn't understand the fact that I killfiled him, so I don't see
anything he spews unless it's quoted in another person's post.

I spent a long time trying to explain things about why it's important to
match spl levels when doing a DBT. He never got it. I tried as long as I
did because I thought there might be a tiny chance that he was actually
trying to get it but was so consumed with rage over not being able to get it
that he was having trouble admitting that he COULDN'T GET IT.

After seeing the recent bilge from Mr. Jute, it seems possible that he may
indeed be another of his sockpuppets. There's a certain similarity in
style, even though Eddie is a dumbed down version.

Either that or Eddie is the real deal, an idiot with Tourette's.

Can't say I miss him.

wrote in message
ink.net...


I spent a long time trying to explain things about why it's important to
match spl levels when doing a DBT. He never got it. I tried as long as I
did because I thought there might be a tiny chance that he was actually
trying to get it but was so consumed with rage over not being able to get
it that he was having trouble admitting that he COULDN'T GET IT.

I think that nobody can be that dumb without trying. Eddie was trying to
**** you off.

After seeing the recent bilge from Mr. Jute,

Herty agreement with that. Jute has mastered Middius' way with a mass of
content-free posts.

it seems possible that he may indeed be another of his sockpuppets.
There's a certain similarity in style, even though Eddie is a dumbed down
version.

Either that or Eddie is the real deal, an idiot with Tourette's.

Can't say I miss him.

More likely, Eddie and Jute have a common animator or animators with common
techniques and goals.

Arny Krueger wrote
nyob wrote



I spent a long time trying to explain things about why it's important to
match spl levels when doing a DBT. He never got it. I tried as long as I
did because I thought there might be a tiny chance that he was actually
trying to get it but was so consumed with rage over not being able to get
it that he was having trouble admitting that he COULDN'T GET IT.



I think that nobody can be that dumb without trying. Eddie was trying to
**** you off.


Why don't you be useful also and share to this forum what your pastor
discussed in his sermon at your church in last Sunday's congregation ?


After seeing the recent bilge from Mr. Jute,

Herty agreement with that. Jute has mastered Middius' way with a mass of
content-free posts.

it seems possible that he may indeed be another of his sockpuppets. There's
a certain similarity in style, even though Eddie is a dumbed down version.

Either that or Eddie is the real deal, an idiot with Tourette's.

Can't say I miss him.


More likely, Eddie and Jute have a common animator or animators with common
techniques and goals.


Did the pastor talk about common goals ?

nyob wrote
dizzy wrote
EddieM wrote:



Any problem ?

I'm pretty sure your problem in that the people you mentioned have
spanked you hard on repeated occasions. So, humiliated, you choose
the route of fact-free attacks, embarrassing yourself even more in the
process.

Eddie doesn't understand the fact that I killfiled him, so I don't see
anything he spews unless it's quoted in another person's post.


Perhaps you can help to enlighten me by indicating these fact-free
attacks that Doozy accuses me.



I spent a long time trying to explain things about why it's important to
match spl levels when doing a DBT. He never got it. I tried as long as I
did because I thought there might be a tiny chance that he was actually
trying to get it but was so consumed with rage over not being able to get it
that he was having trouble admitting that he COULDN'T GET IT.


Matching spl is the embodying of your mental defects. It mark the line
where your stupidity begin to copulate your fantasy.


After seeing the recent bilge from Mr. Jute, it seems possible that he may
indeed be another of his sockpuppets.


Why don't you be useful and write something about bugs.

There's a certain similarity in style, even though Eddie is a dumbed down
version.


Either that or Eddie is the real deal, an idiot with Tourette's.

Can't say I miss him.


Running away like a coward you are only makes you look bad.