Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When I was back in LA, a couple of radio talk show hosts would play a
game called "What Did Jesse Jackson Say?" The hosts would play a clip from one of Jesse's speeches featuring a mumbled phrase from Jackson, and call-in guests would try to figure out the quote verbatim. Watching Scott struggle to communicate over on the Chargers group, I though we could play a similar game..."What Does Scott Mean?" Here's this week's quote from Scott: "If I was GM he'd be my safety valve, injury insurance spending most of the games inactive ala Michael Bennett." So...what did Scott mean? |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 3:21*pm, ScottW wrote:
On Feb 6, 12:47*pm, Boon wrote: When I was back in LA, a couple of radio talk show hosts would play a game called "What Did Jesse Jackson Say?" The hosts would play a clip from one of Jesse's speeches featuring a mumbled phrase from Jackson, and call-in guests would try to figure out the quote verbatim. Watching Scott struggle to communicate over on the Chargers group, I though we could play a similar game..."What Does Scott Mean?" Here's this week's quote from Scott: "If I was GM he'd be my safety valve, injury insurance spending most of the games inactive ala Michael Bennett." So...what did Scott mean? *We were discussing where LT might go and what role can he fill. You are exempt from this game, since you obviously know what you think you meant, Thanks for showing you know as much about football as you do audio. Thanks for the compliment! So why are you spamming an audio group with football trolls? Because you're a funny dude, and we all need a good laugh. Shouldn't you be soldering copper mesh over your windows to protect your poorly designed system from your neighbors nasty wi- fi? Why would I do that? By the way, perhaps you could email Jim Smith, the best audio setup man in the biz, and tell him your thoughts on wireless routers. Be sure to tell him that your system sounds like crap first. ScottW |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since Scott spoiled the first round, here's another:
"I suspect his leadership authority was tainted by his tipp-toe out of bounds with a just a look from a DB running style." What does Scott mean? |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Boon wrote: Since Scott spoiled the first round, here's another: "I suspect his leadership authority was tainted by his tipp-toe out of bounds with a just a look from a DB running style." What does Scott mean? At first thought, I took it to mean his hyphen key broke as he attempted to type 'tip-toe.' Lessee: I suspect with just a look from a DB running out of bounds his leadership authority was tainted by his tip-toe style. Stephen |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 6, 4:39*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *Boon wrote: Since Scott spoiled the first round, here's another: "I suspect his leadership authority was tainted by his tipp-toe out of bounds with a just a look from a DB running style." What does Scott mean? At first thought, I took it to mean his hyphen key broke as he attempted to type 'tip-toe.' Lessee: I suspect with just a look from a DB running out of bounds his leadership authority was tainted by his tip-toe style. Close, but the judges say no cigar. |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For a change of pace, let's check out Scott on the Padres group:
"Sounds like Cunningham doesn't really expect a long career only 5 years removed from his draft and talking of ending it here." What does Scott mean? |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Boon wrote: For a change of pace, let's check out Scott on the Padres group: "Sounds like Cunningham doesn't really expect a long career only 5 years removed from his draft and talking of ending it here." What does Scott mean? It's a reference to American Graffiti 2. Stephen |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 10, 9:06*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *Boon wrote: For a change of pace, let's check out Scott on the Padres group: "Sounds like Cunningham doesn't really expect a long career only 5 years removed from his draft and talking of ending it here." What does Scott mean? It's a reference to American Graffiti 2. We have a winner!! |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's this week's gem:
When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step no matter what you do, you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Chim Chimpsky chimed in:
When guys come up to just ... say ... you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? That the Buffoon is a retard or, if you will, a Buffoontard? |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Boon" wrote in message ... Here's this week's gem: When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step no matter what you do, you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan. |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Harry Lavo" wrote: "Boon" wrote in message ... Here's this week's gem: When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step no matter what you do, you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan. I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his living room. Stephen |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 9:46*am, "Harry Lavo" wrote:
"Boon" wrote in message ... Here's this week's gem: When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step no matter what you do, you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan. I am a football fan, and it's still endlessly amusing to me. |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 10:01*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *"Harry Lavo" wrote: "Boon" wrote in message ... Here's this week's gem: When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step no matter what you do, you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan. I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his living room. Almost. Scott wants the song "Short People" to appear on the next version of Rock Band. Of course, Randy Newman is bubblegum pop music. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 9:46*am, "Harry Lavo" wrote:
"Boon" wrote in message ... Here's this week's gem: When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step no matter what you do, you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan. I would think that somebody who can run with a receiver "step for step no matter what you do" isn't "slow". I would think the slow corners would tend to jam in an attempt to remove the receiver's speed advantage. I'm a football fan. Can you enlighten me on 2pid's deeper meaning? |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 12:38*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Mar 13, 9:46*am, "Harry Lavo" wrote: "Boon" wrote in message ... Here's this week's gem: When guys come up to just a few yards off a receiver and don't bother to try and jam and basically just say I can run with you step for step no matter what you do, you're slow. So...what does Scott mean? Actually, this one isn't too difficult to follow, if you are a football fan. I would think that somebody who can run with a receiver "step for step no matter what you do" isn't "slow". I would think the slow corners would tend to jam in an attempt to remove the receiver's speed advantage. I'm a football fan. Can you enlighten me on 2pid's deeper meaning? to me, he is saying that the receiver is slow.his problem is that his pronouns don't match |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 13, 2:40*pm, Boon wrote:
I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his living room. Almost. Scott wants the song "Short People" to appear on the next version of Rock Band. Of course, Randy Newman is bubblegum pop music. Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy and double standards. I can see where that description could overload duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition of the "bubblegum" slur. |
#18
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 2:21*pm, Glanbrok wrote:
On Mar 13, 2:40*pm, Boon wrote: I thought he was talking about short people playing Rock Band in his living room. Almost. Scott wants the song "Short People" to appear on the next version of Rock Band. Of course, Randy Newman is bubblegum pop music. Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy and double standards. I can see where that description could overload duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition of the "bubblegum" slur. Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions, noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they read. |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon wrote:
Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy and double standards. I can see where that description could overload duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition of the "bubblegum" slur. Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions, noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they read. I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 3:09*pm, Glanbrok wrote:
On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon wrote: Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy and double standards. I can see where that description could overload duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition of the "bubblegum" slur. Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions, noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they read. I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Boon wrote: On Mar 14, 3:09*pm, Glanbrok wrote: On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon wrote: Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy and double standards. I can see where that description could overload duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition of the "bubblegum" slur. Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions, noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they read. I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. Stephen |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 3:54*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *Boon wrote: On Mar 14, 3:09*pm, Glanbrok wrote: On Mar 14, 3:44*pm, Boon wrote: Some might say Newman is a wry and insightful observer of hypocrisy and double standards. I can see where that description could overload duh-Scottie's meager brain power and instigate yet another repetition of the "bubblegum" slur. Well, he thought The Shins were bubblegum pop, which shows how little he knows about music. Compared to the funeral dirges he calls "progressive rock," I suppose they are. His idea of rock and roll is rich British men glancing outside the windows of their mansions, noticing it's raining and then reminiscing about the last book they read. I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. You can't be a music lover if you hate more than you love. |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico? |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 14, 6:27*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: You just have to make allowances for Scottie-speak. What do you suppose 2pid's native tongue is? I'm guessing Pidgen. Here's an interesting take on the unreliability of verbal communication from the likes Witlessmongrel: * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Dog Body Language Any dog owner will tell you that their four-legged family members speak volumes with their bodies. Here are some typical signals dogs use: Face: Dogs will wrinkle or straighten their foreheads to show confusion or determination. Eyes: A dog’s eyes brighten when he looks at a creature he considers friendly. When he is afraid, his pupils dilate and he shows the whites of his eyes. Lips, teeth and tongue: If your dog is happy or wants to play, he may pull his lips back and show his teeth in what appears to be a smile. This is a gesture that is reserved only for human/dog communication; a dog will not do this with other dogs. Ears: If a dog’s ears are raised, he is relaxed or listening. If they are back, he might be signaling submission. Tail: A recent study published in “Current Biology” shows that the way a dog wags its tail indicates how he feels. If the tail wags more to the right, it is a sign of positive feelings; left-side wagging indicates negative feelings http://www.petinsurance.com/healthzo...-behavior/The- Secret-Language-of-Dogs.aspx * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Once again, I feel obliged to remind the group that trying to have a human-style exchange with Witlessmongrel is pointless. If it's not the uncontrolled yapping, it's the burying of key words that would render the pooch's 'thoughts' comprehensible to humans. |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Glanbrok wrote: On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 wrote: I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico? The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life. It would have been a different movie if they'd played "Comfortably Numb" instead of the Shins. Stephen |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *Glanbrok wrote: On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * wrote: I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico? The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life. Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a problem with lying? |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Boon wrote: On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 wrote: In article , *Glanbrok wrote: On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * wrote: I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico? The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life. Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a problem with lying? There was an identity problem as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manic_Pixie_Dream_Girl "that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures." Stephen |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 15, 12:37*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *Boon wrote: On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 * wrote: In article , *Glanbrok wrote: On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * wrote: I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico? The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life. Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a problem with lying? There was an identity problem as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manic_Pixie_Dream_Girl "that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures." That's funny. I never knew there was a name for them. |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Boon wrote: On Mar 15, 12:37*pm, MiNe 109 wrote: In article , *Boon wrote: On Mar 15, 10:25*am, MiNe 109 * wrote: In article , *Glanbrok wrote: On Mar 14, 4:54 pm, MiNe 109 * wrote: I like the Shins. Aren't they from Oz? That alone might set off Witless's bark reflex. Nope, they're from Albuquerque. I've never heard anyone say they didn't like them...until The Dip**** came along. Some people don't want their lives changed. Is that a necessary side-effect of listening to bands from New Mexico? The girl in the waiting room said they would change your life. Yes, she did. I forgot about her. Then again, didn't she have a problem with lying? There was an identity problem as well: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manic_Pixie_Dream_Girl "that bubbly, shallow cinematic creature that exists solely in the fevered imaginations of sensitive writer-directors to teach broodingly soulful young men to embrace life and its infinite mysteries and adventures." That's funny. I never knew there was a name for them. Oddly enough, they seem to exist in real life, except for the benefiting others part. Stephen |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's today's gem:
"I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." |
#31
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon wrote:
Here's today's gem: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion. If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one actually almost made 2pid sound smart. |
#32
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon wrote: Here's today's gem: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion. If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one actually almost made 2pid sound smart. Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball? Stephen |
#33
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 6:06*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon wrote: Here's today's gem: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion. If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one actually almost made 2pid sound smart. It's okay. He's to prolific so there will be more. |
#34
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 8:45*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon wrote: Here's today's gem: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion. If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one actually almost made 2pid sound smart. Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball? Not if there's a turnover. |
#35
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article
, Boon wrote: On Mar 16, 8:45*pm, MiNe 109 wrote: In article , *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon wrote: Here's today's gem: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion. If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one actually almost made 2pid sound smart. Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball? Not if there's a turnover. Must be "defense puts the ball into play" or something, but I'd think cricket does, too. This gets dumber the more I think about it, so good enough for now. Stephen |
#36
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 8:45*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
In article , *"Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!" wrote: On Mar 16, 3:19*pm, Boon wrote: Here's today's gem: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." Too easy: 2pid wants the "D" to get the ball back with enough time to score so that the booth can't challenge how much of the clock was to easily ;-) burned in "OT" before the boneheaded official changes the game to something else like Jai Alai. If the game is changed to something else 2pid simply wants the ability to challenge this but to not have the booth review his challenge because the booth is too "prolific" ;-) in the things they review in 2pid's imbecilic opinion. If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one actually almost made 2pid sound smart. Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball? STFU. This is 2pid's scenario and he doesn't very well suffer his "differing POV" being "oppressed". You liberal POS. Next you'll claim that there's a health care crisis in the US. Next! LoL. |
#37
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 11:54*pm, MiNe 109 wrote:
This gets dumber the more I think about it, so good enough for now. How dare you. LoL. 2pid is smarter than all of us combined. LoL. |
#38
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 4:19*pm, Boon wrote:
Here's today's gem: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." Witless needs to cut back on the caffeine before his 'motor' burns itself out. |
#39
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 7:06*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: "I don't know why we would make it easy for a team in OT to burn all the clock and not let the D get the ball back and I don't want some bonehead official to change the game with no challenge (and the the booth is way to prolific in reviews IMO)." If you're going to pick 2pid gems make them harder than this. This one actually almost made 2pid sound smart. Witless looooves "Heidi", you know. |
#40
![]()
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 16, 11:58*pm, Boon wrote:
Isn't baseball the only game in which the defense has the ball? Not if there's a turnover. mmmmm....Pastry! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hey Scott W | Audio Opinions | |||
Hey Scott... | Pro Audio | |||
HH Scott? | Audio Opinions | |||
Attention Art, Scott, and Scott... | Audio Opinions |