Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
|
|||
|
|||
NAT: A different response
On Jun 8, 1:12*am, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote: On Jun 7, 9:31*pm, George M. Middius wrote: Sacky is on a ro-o-o-ollll. Sacky stupidized: If Obama addresses "don't ask, don't tell" I'll bet you $5 that either 2pid or Clyde will trot out "unit cohesion" as a 'reason' to keep gays from openly serving in the military. I answered this months ago. Its up to the military authorities to asses the situation. This kind of moronic posturing is one reason for my earlier assertion: "Unlike you, he doesn't make dogmatic assertions, he doesn't exhibit mindless prejudices and irrational biases". there is no dogma, mindless prejudice and irrational bias. dogma: only "the military" are capable of releasing human rights from captivity prejudice: Gays have some secret disability known only to "the military" irrational bias: I admit you didn't state this here, but in the past you have fatuously claimed that since marriage has always been a hetero institution, it should always remain so. I presumed that a similar bias underlay your current weaseling about the sanctity of the Most High Secret Military Lore (i.e. "the military" has always had a policy of not tolerating Gays, so that state of affairs should continue). As I said, prepare for the old saw "unit cohesion". I think Clyde is prepping the battlefield for its introduction. That is the third time "YOU" mentioned it. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NAT: A different response | Audio Opinions | |||
NAT: A different response | Audio Opinions | |||
NAT: A different response | Audio Opinions | |||
NAT: A different response | Audio Opinions | |||
Frequency response | Pro Audio |