Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Joe Duffy
 
Posts: n/a
Default Infrasonic Susceptibility

In article ,
Girth wrote:

http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science...eut/index.html


There was an article about this in Hifi News months ago.


I'm always behind the times.
It's exciting when testing uncovers what
was always known.



Joe

  #2   Report Post  
Arny Krueger
 
Posts: n/a
Default Infrasonic Susceptibility

"Joe Duffy" wrote in message


As much as it goes against the grain
of the crippled fuhrer of rao's agenda,
I will post this bit of audio info:


http://www.cnn.com/2003/TECH/science...eut/index.html


Measuring has always lagged behind perception.


How so? Measuring low frequency, even infrasonic sound is just a matter of
having the right measuring gear.

Google pulled up this paper about infrasonic measurements right quickly:

http://www.etl.noaa.gov/et1/infrasound/infrasonic.html

It includes footnotes going back up to 45 years.


Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:05 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"