Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
What audio compression format am I thinking of?
I remember reading an article on audio compression formats a while
back, probably between 1-2 years ago, and I *thought* I found it on the www.overclockers.com.au main page, but I can't seem to find that same article now. Anyway, in that article I remember it mentioning a particular lossy audio compression format that was apparently preferred by audiophiles because it supposedly offered superior quality to a 320kbps mp3 at something like 192-224kbps, but it was fixed at that bitrate (that doesn't mean it wasn't actually VBR, it just meant you couldn't really choose the bitrate you wanted to base it around). Either that, or the format was optimised for that bitrate so choosing anything else would give less than superior quality. I think it was also this format that took a lot of CPU time to compress, but was fairly easy to decompress, making it ideal for portable audio players. Unfortunately, I don't think this format is supported by many (if any) players, but I still want to find out what it was. I've been reading a few articles on various audio compression formats and I keep thinking that it was AAC that I'm talking about, but I'm pretty sure the one I'm after was open source (AAC isn't open source, is it?). And while I've got your attention, are there any lossy/lossless audio compression formats around for SACD or DVDAudio? |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
What audio compression format am I thinking of?
wrote:
I remember reading an article on audio compression formats a while back, probably between 1-2 years ago, and I *thought* I found it on the www.overclockers.com.au main page, but I can't seem to find that same article now. Anyway, in that article I remember it mentioning a particular lossy audio compression format that was apparently preferred by audiophiles because it supposedly offered superior quality to a 320kbps mp3 at something like 192-224kbps, but it was fixed at that bitrate (that doesn't mean it wasn't actually VBR, it just meant you couldn't really choose the bitrate you wanted to base it around). Either that, or the format was optimised for that bitrate so choosing anything else would give less than superior quality. I think it was also this format that took a lot of CPU time to compress, but was fairly easy to decompress, making it ideal for portable audio players. Unfortunately, I don't think this format is supported by many (if any) players, but I still want to find out what it was. Unfortunately, I don't think this format is supported by many (if any) players, but I still want to find out what it was. It is Ogg Vorbis: http://www.vorbis.com/ http://www.vorbis.com/faq/ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vorbis http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ogg And while I've got your attention, are there any lossy/lossless audio compression formats around for SACD or DVDAudio? SACD and DAD-A use always not compressed linear digital signals. Cheers Jens |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Topic Police | Pro Audio | |||
DNC Schedule of Events | Pro Audio |