Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Cheapest reverb unit with SPDIF digital out ?
Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix
while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. rod |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Rodney St-Pierre wrote:
Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. Try the TC Electronic M300. -- Eric Practice Your Mixing Skills Multi-Track Masters on CD-ROM www.Raw-Tracks.com |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Any suggestions?
The Boss VF1 has a SPDIF out, only 44.1k, though. Scott Fraser |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Rodney St-Pierre" wrote in message
news Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. Lexicon MPX110 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Why is the "cheapest" what you want, when the "best" for a given price range
without SPDIF might sound much better? Unless your A/Ds are utter crap (which hardly any are these days), or for some reason you have no A/D capability at all, I don't see why cheapness should ever be your yardstick... Ted Spencer, NYC "No amount of classical training will ever teach you what's so cool about "Tighten Up" by Archie Bell And The Drells" -author unknown |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Since the reverb unit will be used mostly for adding 'verb in the headphones
to monitor while tracking, I don't need 'the best'. I will most likely be using a reverb plugin (the SIR impulse reverb is free and very nice sounding). It has to be digital out because my soundcard (M-Audio Firewire 310) also no-latency direct monitoring of effects through the digital in. Otherwise, I would agree that generally the 'best sound' for a a certain price range is the best way to buy. rod ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ted Spencer" Newsgroups: rec.audio.pro Sent: Sunday, August 29, 2004 10:01 AM Subject: Cheapest reverb unit with SPDIF digital out ? Why is the "cheapest" what you want, when the "best" for a given price range without SPDIF might sound much better? Unless your A/Ds are utter crap (which hardly any are these days), or for some reason you have no A/D capability at all, I don't see why cheapness should ever be your yardstick... Ted Spencer, NYC "No amount of classical training will ever teach you what's so cool about "Tighten Up" by Archie Bell And The Drells" -author unknownunknown |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
You will have digital clocking problems if you're trying to use both the
reverb and your sound card as clock master. On the other hand, the clock in the digital reverb may not be as good as the one in your sound card. Truth is, you really want a digital reverb with a SPDIF out AND a word clock connection... at least ideally. -- ------------------------------------------------------------- Now available: new Particle Salad CD "The Track Inside." See http://www.particlesalad.com for more info. "Rodney St-Pierre" wrote in message news Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. rod |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TC Electronic M300 is very good and fairly cheap.
"Rodney St-Pierre" skrev i en meddelelse news Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. rod |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
in article , EricK at
wrote on 8/28/04 11:57 PM: Rodney St-Pierre wrote: Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. Try the TC Electronic M300. Have they FIXED this thing yet? I bought it early on, on the basis merely of it being TC... and while it's nifty, has some wonderful sounds in there and I really only expected a tweaked different flavor of the LEXICON 100, the problem with something as straightforward as the straight delays (and -maybe- some of the reverbs), even after long phone calls trying to get a straight answer from the tech and design folks, remains both annoying, inexplicable, and inexcusable. -- John I-22 (that's 'I' for Initial...) Recognising what's NOT worth your time, THAT'S the key. -- |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
JoVee wrote:
in article , EricK at wrote on 8/28/04 11:57 PM: Rodney St-Pierre wrote: Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. Try the TC Electronic M300. Have they FIXED this thing yet? I bought it early on, on the basis merely of it being TC... and while it's nifty, has some wonderful sounds in there and I really only expected a tweaked different flavor of the LEXICON 100, the problem with something as straightforward as the straight delays (and -maybe- some of the reverbs), even after long phone calls trying to get a straight answer from the tech and design folks, remains both annoying, inexplicable, and inexcusable. Are you talking about effects units manufacturers not including simple programs in the presets? Most of the Lexicons have all kinds of wacky stuff like the WhizbangManifoldDiscombobulatorPlanetoid but when you want a simple delay---nowhere to be seen. I often want a simple delay---no ping-ponging, chorusing, or anything. Just a simple delay with parameters like regeneration and length. Because if that's what you are annoyed with---I agree. Rob R. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
in article , Rob Reedijk at
wrote on 8/30/04 12:12 PM: JoVee wrote: in article , EricK at wrote on 8/28/04 11:57 PM: Rodney St-Pierre wrote: Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. Try the TC Electronic M300. Have they FIXED this thing yet? I bought it early on, on the basis merely of it being TC... and while it's nifty, has some wonderful sounds in there and I really only expected a tweaked different flavor of the LEXICON 100, the problem with something as straightforward as the straight delays (and -maybe- some of the reverbs), even after long phone calls trying to get a straight answer from the tech and design folks, remains both annoying, inexplicable, and inexcusable. Are you talking about effects units manufacturers not including simple programs in the presets? Most of the Lexicons have all kinds of wacky stuff like the WhizbangManifoldDiscombobulatorPlanetoid but when you want a simple delay---nowhere to be seen. I often want a simple delay---no ping-ponging, chorusing, or anything. Just a simple delay with parameters like regeneration and length. Because if that's what you are annoyed with---I agree. Rob R. that too but minor. What I refer to here is an M300 fault in the delay algorythms that results in (I THINK) a sample or 2 delay twixt L and R outputs on a MONO delay signal... sounds not-quite-center... not-quite-out-of-polarity-odd... sums to mono weird and is just plain WRONG. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
in article znr1093876994k@trad, Mike Rivers at wrote on
8/30/04 3:33 PM: In article writes: Try the TC Electronic M300. the problem with something as straightforward as the straight delays (and -maybe- some of the reverbs), even after long phone calls trying to get a straight answer from the tech and design folks, remains both annoying, inexplicable, and inexcusable. And just what is the problem of which you speak? What I refer to here is an M300 fault in the delay algorythms that results in (I THINK) a sample or 2 delay twixt L and R outputs on a MONO delay signal... sounds not-quite-center... not-quite-out-of-polarity-odd... sums to mono weird and is just plain WRONG. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
in article , Peter Kaersaa at Peter
Kaersaa wrote on 8/31/04 4:36 PM: In article , says... What I refer to here is an M300 fault in the delay algorythms that results in (I THINK) a sample or 2 delay twixt L and R outputs on a MONO delay signal... sounds not-quite-center... not-quite-out-of-polarity-odd... sums to mono weird and is just plain WRONG. Not a fault but a feature? From the TC-M300 FAQ: --- snip ---- Q: The delays in the M300 seems to have a pseudo stereo effect ? A: Yes, that is correct. The outputs of the delays have a 90 degree phase shift between each other. The reason for this is to make a slightly wider stereo image AND in order not to get too much delay if your signal is summed to mono. --- snip ---- HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... what a load... wait... that's how our Currently Elected Officials are explaining huge screw-ups... why am I laughing. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
In article writes: From the TC-M300 FAQ: The outputs of the delays have a 90 degree phase shift between each other. The reason for this is to make a slightly wider stereo image AND in order not to get too much delay if your signal is summed to mono. That sounds pretty obtuse. I wonder how they get a 90 degree phase shift with a digital device when they don't know what frequency is going into it. All-pass filters? If it's a featue, it needs a better explanation than that. -- I'm really Mike Rivers ) However, until the spam goes away or Hell freezes over, lots of IP addresses are blocked from this system. If you e-mail me and it bounces, use your secret decoder ring and reach me he double-m-eleven-double-zero at yahoo |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
In article ,
"Particle Salad" wrote: You will have digital clocking problems if you're trying to use both the reverb and your sound card as clock master. Good point... On the other hand, the clock in the digital reverb may not be as good as the one in your sound card. Truth is, you really want a digital reverb with a SPDIF out AND a word clock connection... at least ideally. A reverb with a digital input is quite sufficient. There's really no reason to require word clock, and coincidentally, I've never personally seen a digital reverb with a WC input. They might exist in the form of Lexicon 960s and the like, but not for short money... Barring WC, this opens a can of worms, since you now need to cook up a digital send to the reverb, presumably from the DAW. Doing this without latency might be really tough. ....which brings us back to the question for the OP: what's so bad about analog IO? You purposely wanted a ****ty reverb, right? Why polish it with digital IO??? My suggestion: split the signals going into your DAW. One side goes to the converters, the other goes to an analog mixer. Put an analog IO reverb on an effect send and wire the console mix outputs to your headphone rig. Problem solved. Analog monitoring is good. Remember, "no latency" monitoring is still a ms. or two off due to converter delays. Why not avoid it all with analog. Regards, Monte McGuire |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Lexicon 960L.
-- Roger W. Norman SirMusic Studio "Monte McGuire" wrote in message ... In article , "Particle Salad" wrote: You will have digital clocking problems if you're trying to use both the reverb and your sound card as clock master. Good point... On the other hand, the clock in the digital reverb may not be as good as the one in your sound card. Truth is, you really want a digital reverb with a SPDIF out AND a word clock connection... at least ideally. A reverb with a digital input is quite sufficient. There's really no reason to require word clock, and coincidentally, I've never personally seen a digital reverb with a WC input. They might exist in the form of Lexicon 960s and the like, but not for short money... Barring WC, this opens a can of worms, since you now need to cook up a digital send to the reverb, presumably from the DAW. Doing this without latency might be really tough. ...which brings us back to the question for the OP: what's so bad about analog IO? You purposely wanted a ****ty reverb, right? Why polish it with digital IO??? My suggestion: split the signals going into your DAW. One side goes to the converters, the other goes to an analog mixer. Put an analog IO reverb on an effect send and wire the console mix outputs to your headphone rig. Problem solved. Analog monitoring is good. Remember, "no latency" monitoring is still a ms. or two off due to converter delays. Why not avoid it all with analog. Regards, Monte McGuire |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Lexicon 960L.
Hah!! John A. Chiara SOS Recording Studio Live Sound Inc. Albany, NY www.sosrecording.net 518-449-1637 |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
I just picked up three old Alesis Wedge reverbs on EBay for $100.00 a
piece.. I've got these things paired with three Furman HRM 16's and it's like a match made in heaven. Very nice reverbs for cue mixes and though I've got a lot of choices here for 'verb, I'm pretty sure these will be finding their way into a few final mixes as well. These are surprisingly good sounding units................no digital I/O, but if you've got decent (and available) AD/DA converters, one of these might be the ticket for you. Doug Joyce Animix Productions Durango, CO "Rodney St-Pierre" wrote in message news Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. rod |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I just picked up three old Alesis Wedge reverbs on EBay for $100.00 a
piece.. I've got these things paired with three Furman HRM 16's and it's like a match made in heaven. Very nice reverbs for cue mixes and though I've got a lot of choices here for 'verb, I'm pretty sure these will be finding their way into a few final mixes as well. These are surprisingly good sounding units................no digital I/O, but if you've got decent (and available) AD/DA converters, one of these might be the ticket for you. Doug Joyce Animix Productions Durango, CO "Rodney St-Pierre" wrote in message news Any suggestions? Will be used mostly to add reverb to the monitor mix while recording, not necessarily keeping the same reverb on the final mix. If the unit had other effects too, that would be fine. rod |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
common mode rejection vs. crosstalk | Pro Audio | |||
Artists cut out the record biz | Pro Audio |