![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/05/2021 23:19, Chris K-Man wrote:
> On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 10:03:27 AM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote: >> On 10/05/2021 13:14, Chris K-Man wrote: >>> On Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 7:01:11 AM UTC-4, wrote: >> >>>> The 1954 recording by Reiner conducting Chicago Symphony is considered by many to be the standard to which others are measured. >>>> >>> I wonder if that's the version that was used in the score for '2001: A Space Odyssey' >>> >> Not according to Imdb. >> >> Thus Spoke Zarathustra >> Music by Richard Strauss >> Performed by Wiener Philharmoniker (uncredited) >> Conducted by Herbert von Karajan (uncredited) >> >> Kubrick and Clarke used commercial recordings for the music track, as >> they had run out of money for a realm orchestral sound track. As it >> happened, it worked very well. >> >> -- >> Tciao for Now! >> >> John. > ______ > > Do we have a year for that version? 1960s? > It took me almost a minute to find out that Karajan and the Wiener Philharmoniker only issued one recording of that piece. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 3:40:20 AM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote:
> On 10/05/2021 23:19, Chris K-Man wrote: > > On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 10:03:27 AM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote: > >> On 10/05/2021 13:14, Chris K-Man wrote: > >>> On Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 7:01:11 AM UTC-4, wrote: > >> > >>>> The 1954 recording by Reiner conducting Chicago Symphony is considered by many to be the standard to which others are measured. > >>>> > >>> I wonder if that's the version that was used in the score for '2001: A Space Odyssey' > >>> > >> Not according to Imdb. > >> > >> Thus Spoke Zarathustra > >> Music by Richard Strauss > >> Performed by Wiener Philharmoniker (uncredited) > >> Conducted by Herbert von Karajan (uncredited) > >> > >> Kubrick and Clarke used commercial recordings for the music track, as > >> they had run out of money for a realm orchestral sound track. As it > >> happened, it worked very well. > >> > >> -- > >> Tciao for Now! > >> > >> John. > > ______ > > > > Do we have a year for that version? 1960s? > > > It took me almost a minute to find out that Karajan and the Wiener > Philharmoniker only issued one recording of that piece. > -- > Tciao for Now! > > John. ________ Original analog 1974, might be the version on this CD: https://www.amazon.com/Strauss-Sprac.../dp/B000001GQT 2001: came out in 1968 in theaters, so Karajan must have performed exclusively for Kubrick before then. As for the OP: No need to source a SACD of Also Sprach. Only of benefit to dogs! See CD above. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/11/21 5:20 AM, Chris K-Man wrote:
> On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 3:40:20 AM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote: >> On 10/05/2021 23:19, Chris K-Man wrote: >>> On Monday, May 10, 2021 at 10:03:27 AM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote: >>>> On 10/05/2021 13:14, Chris K-Man wrote: >>>>> On Sunday, May 9, 2021 at 7:01:11 AM UTC-4, wrote: >>>> >>>>>> The 1954 recording by Reiner conducting Chicago Symphony is considered by many to be the standard to which others are measured. >>>>>> >>>>> I wonder if that's the version that was used in the score for '2001: A Space Odyssey' >>>>> >>>> Not according to Imdb. >>>> >>>> Thus Spoke Zarathustra >>>> Music by Richard Strauss >>>> Performed by Wiener Philharmoniker (uncredited) >>>> Conducted by Herbert von Karajan (uncredited) >>>> >>>> Kubrick and Clarke used commercial recordings for the music track, as >>>> they had run out of money for a realm orchestral sound track. As it >>>> happened, it worked very well. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Tciao for Now! >>>> >>>> John. >>> ______ >>> >>> Do we have a year for that version? 1960s? >>> >> It took me almost a minute to find out that Karajan and the Wiener >> Philharmoniker only issued one recording of that piece. >> -- >> Tciao for Now! >> >> John. > ________ > Original analog 1974, might be the version on this CD: https://www.amazon.com/Strauss-Sprac.../dp/B000001GQT > > 2001: came out in 1968 in theaters, so Karajan must have performed > exclusively for Kubrick before then. > > As for the OP: No need to source a SACD of Also Sprach. Only of benefit > to dogs! See CD above. That's the Berlin orchestra. Here's the Vienna performance used in 2001, recorded 1959: https://www.amazon.com/Strauss-sprac.../dp/B00004C8TF Yes, there's a Japanese SHM-SACD. The version on the MGM soundtrack album, Karl Bohm/Berlin, wasn't used in the movie. Alex North's rejected soundtrack has also been recorded. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11/05/2021 11:20, Chris K-Man wrote:
_______ > Original analog 1974, might be the version on this CD: https://www.amazon.com/Strauss-Sprac.../dp/B000001GQT > > 2001: came out in 1968 in theaters, so Karajan must have performed > exclusively for Kubrick before then. > No, it was a commercially released recording, and seems to be the the that was recorded in 1959, which is the only one I can find listed online. The orchestra recorded other versions, but not with Karajan in charge. *All* the music used in 2001 was readily available commercial releases, and the music track was mixed not long before the cinematic release. -- Tciao for Now! John. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, May 11, 2021 at 1:54:51 PM UTC-4, John Williamson wrote:
> On 11/05/2021 11:20, Chris K-Man wrote: > _______ > > Original analog 1974, might be the version on this CD: https://www.amazon.com/Strauss-Sprac.../dp/B000001GQT > > > > 2001: came out in 1968 in theaters, so Karajan must have performed > > exclusively for Kubrick before then. > > > No, it was a commercially released recording, and seems to be the the > that was recorded in 1959, which is the only one I can find listed > online. The orchestra recorded other versions, but not with Karajan in > charge. > > *All* the music used in 2001 was readily available commercial releases, > and the music track was mixed not long before the cinematic release. > -- > Tciao for Now! > > John. _________ That 1959 one would make sense for use in 2001:. It's widely considered to be THE Zarathustra by which all other performances of it are compared. And then, there's THIS ![]() hearing it on TV in my folks' living room) https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=zLmsZC45-m8&t=360s |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 11 May 2021, MiNe109 > wrote in
rec.audio.pro: > The version on the MGM soundtrack album, Karl Bohm/Berlin, wasn't > used in the movie. Alex North's rejected soundtrack has also been > recorded. Interesting, I did not know that! I've seen the film many times, and I've had the soundtrack LP since it came out. I never noticed that they are different recordings. I've listened to the soundtrack LP the most, and that's how it's supposed to sound to me. The biggest goose-bump moment for me is the bit of pipe organ that pops out at the very end. The Bohm/Berlin LP version holds the chord longer and is brighter and has a beautiful shimmering quality. The Karajan/Vienna film version organ is a bit less prominent. I also listened to the Reiner/Chicago version mentioned above. I don't like it nearly as much! It's too brassy, and the strings are too subdued. Also the organ is quite flat compared to the orchestra. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 May 2021 15:10:05 -0400, Nil > wrote:
>On 11 May 2021, MiNe109 > wrote in >rec.audio.pro: > >> The version on the MGM soundtrack album, Karl Bohm/Berlin, wasn't >> used in the movie. Alex North's rejected soundtrack has also been >> recorded. > >Interesting, I did not know that! I've seen the film many times, and >I've had the soundtrack LP since it came out. I never noticed that they >are different recordings. I've listened to the soundtrack LP the most, >and that's how it's supposed to sound to me. The biggest goose-bump >moment for me is the bit of pipe organ that pops out at the very end. >The Bohm/Berlin LP version holds the chord longer and is brighter and >has a beautiful shimmering quality. The Karajan/Vienna film version >organ is a bit less prominent. I also listened to the Reiner/Chicago >version mentioned above. I don't like it nearly as much! It's too >brassy, and the strings are too subdued. Also the organ is quite flat >compared to the orchestra. Consensus seems to be there are 4 or 5 excellent recordings.Here's a good discussion. There are 5 pages to click. https://www.talkclassical.com/65666-...ecordings.html |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/12/2021 7:31 PM, Nil wrote:
> On 12 May 2021, wrote in rec.audio.pro: > >> On Wed, 12 May 2021 15:10:05 -0400, Nil >> > wrote: >> >>> On 11 May 2021, MiNe109 > wrote in >>> rec.audio.pro: >>> >>>> The version on the MGM soundtrack album, Karl Bohm/Berlin, >>>> wasn't used in the movie. Alex North's rejected soundtrack has >>>> also been recorded. >>> >>> Interesting, I did not know that! I've seen the film many times, >>> and I've had the soundtrack LP since it came out. I never noticed >>> that they are different recordings. I've listened to the >>> soundtrack LP the most, and that's how it's supposed to sound to >>> me. The biggest goose-bump moment for me is the bit of pipe organ >>> that pops out at the very end. The Bohm/Berlin LP version holds >>> the chord longer and is brighter and has a beautiful shimmering >>> quality. The Karajan/Vienna film version organ is a bit less >>> prominent. I also listened to the Reiner/Chicago version mentioned >>> above. I don't like it nearly as much! It's too brassy, and the >>> strings are too subdued. Also the organ is quite flat compared to >>> the orchestra. >> >> Consensus seems to be there are 4 or 5 excellent recordings.Here's >> a good discussion. There are 5 pages to click. >> >> https://www.talkclassical.com/65666-...ecordings.html > > Thanks for that - interesting discussion by people who would know better > than I. Nobody mentions the Bohm/Berlin version as a favorite, but it's the > one I've heard the most so it sounds most right to me. The Karajan/Vienna > film version is similar and also excellent, but the pipe organ bits don't > have the same impact for me. > I vote for the Bohm/Berlin version from 1958, available in a variety of collections. (Beware the CBS Records version, there is a ton of subsonic stuff that will make your woofers come unhinged). When 2001 A Space Odyssey was released in 1968, I did not go to see it. But I did buy the official LP soundtrack, which included the Bohm/Berlin version of Zarathustra. I played Zarathustra often and LOUD. It was very exhilarating. It wasn't until years later that I saw the movie and heard the Karajan version. Frankly, I was disappointed in the Karajan version. It seemed to be missing the intensity and tension and emotion of the epic battle that the piece supposedly represents. The Bohm/Berlin version, in my humble opinion, nailed it. I have no idea how the piece was intended to be played by Strauss, but I love the Bohm/Berlin version, played LOUD. REALLY LOUD. On my long list of things to do that I will likely never get to, is to remaster the movie with the Bohm/Berlin version in place of the Karajan version. But I am no expert on classical music. Just one guy's opinion. John Hardy |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 May 2021, John Hardy > wrote in
rec.audio.pro: > On 5/12/2021 7:31 PM, Nil wrote: >> >> Thanks for that - interesting discussion by people who would know >> better than I. Nobody mentions the Bohm/Berlin version as a >> favorite, but it's the one I've heard the most so it sounds most >> right to me. The Karajan/Vienna film version is similar and also >> excellent, but the pipe organ bits don't have the same impact for >> me. > > I vote for the Bohm/Berlin version from 1958, available in a > variety of collections. (Beware the CBS Records version, there is > a ton of subsonic stuff that will make your woofers come > unhinged). > > When 2001 A Space Odyssey was released in 1968, I did not go to > see it. But I did buy the official LP soundtrack, which included > the Bohm/Berlin version of Zarathustra. I played Zarathustra often > and LOUD. It was very exhilarating. It wasn't until years later > that I saw the movie and heard the Karajan version. Frankly, I was > disappointed in the Karajan version. It seemed to be missing the > intensity and tension and emotion of the epic battle that the > piece supposedly represents. The Bohm/Berlin version, in my humble > opinion, nailed it. > > I have no idea how the piece was intended to be played by Strauss, > but I love the Bohm/Berlin version, played LOUD. REALLY LOUD. On > my long list of things to do that I will likely never get to, is > to remaster the movie with the Bohm/Berlin version in place of the > Karajan version. > > But I am no expert on classical music. Just one guy's opinion. > > John Hardy I did see 2001 when it first came out, several times, including three times in Cinerama. I was nuts about that movie. To see the dramatic opening and closing scenes on a fresh print on a huge, wraparound Cinerama screen, and yes, it was LOUD LOUD LOUD... the experience impressed me for life. The Von Karajan version was completely up to the task in that environment. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SACD vs SACD or DVD Audio player | Edmund[_2_] | High End Audio | 6 | September 24th 09 09:54 PM |
SACD & DSD | Tiagahsong | Tech | 7 | July 9th 07 03:56 PM |
SACD | AL | High End Audio | 8 | November 24th 05 07:20 AM |
SACD | Chicken Legs | General | 2 | October 23rd 04 07:51 PM |
SACD + DVD-A | PostLot | Audio Opinions | 1 | June 10th 04 12:47 PM |