![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 5/25/2021 9:34 AM, Don Pearce wrote:
> Nobody has yet designed a VST transformer effect? About time, I > reckon. Maybe someone has, though I'm not aware of it. But there are many preamp models that include a model of the transformer used in the hardware version. -- For a good time, call http://mikeriversaudio.wordpress.com |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 26/05/2021 1:34 am, Don Pearce wrote:
> On Tue, 25 May 2021 09:19:31 -0400, Mike Rivers > > wrote: > >> On 5/25/2021 4:30 AM, Don Pearce wrote: >>> Well, anyone who is still messing with transformers gets what he >>> deserves. Active electronics provide common mode rejection every bit >>> as good these days, and without the distortion and frequency response >>> penalties inherent in the non-linear magnetic properties of iron. >> >> If the only reason to "mess" with transformers was to provide an >> accurate balanced connection, then, sure, get rid of them. The THAT >> chips make for better common mode rejection than any transformer. >> >> However, today's recordists have either been brainwashed or have decided >> on their own that their recordings should include some of the "vintage" >> sound of 50 year old equipment, to which transformers are a significant >> contributor. And for that, there's nothing like a transformer. > > Nobody has yet designed a VST transformer effect? About time, I > reckon. > > d > Well the is/was 'Magneto' for tape emuluation. geoff |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Universal audio preamp comparison | Matt | Pro Audio | 1 | January 15th 07 06:07 PM |
A Comparison | [email protected] | Audio Opinions | 136 | October 27th 05 06:14 AM |
Car Amp Comparison | Trader | Car Audio | 366 | December 6th 04 05:12 PM |
here are some preamp comparison results | jnorman | Pro Audio | 13 | November 25th 03 04:36 AM |
comparison | Number2Penzil | Car Audio | 3 | August 12th 03 05:36 PM |