Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
Introducing a New Horse to the Stable
On Wednesday, October 16, 2019 at 12:43:04 PM UTC-4, Peter Wieck wrote:
a) Argument-by-exception is, generally, fallacious. Argument-by-exceptionally-rare-exception: more fallacious? :-) b) Anything including a coil that carries current will be inductive. Not necessarily true, especially over the bandwidth of interest. I have, for example, measured transformers intended for wide- band audio use (Jensen comes to mind) that, when e secondary is loaded with it's intended resistive load, exhibits completely resistive impedance with NO sign of an indictive component well beyond the audio bandwith. Further, even considering the lowly typical "high-end tweeter", as one sweeps upward in frequency, one observes first primarily resistive impedance, then resistive-inductive, then resistive, then resistive-capactive, then resistive and then, finally, as one approaches the high-frequency cutoff, resistive-inductive. And even at that, the impedance is dominated by, in the vast majority of cases (both tweeters and frequencies) the resistive component of the impedance. But, really, to be technically accurate, one should say that when current is being asked to move across a subtended area, it will exhibit inductive behavior. It has nothing, per se, to do with "coils": the effective inductance of the prior circular particle accelerators was a rather thorny problem. It's not as much of an issue for the LHC, simple because you really have two "coils" occupying the same physical space (to a reasonable approximation), running 180 degrees out of phase, thus cancelling the inductance. c) Most well-designed speakers using conventional drivers that include voice-coils will account for this in their design. I might be inclined to emphasize "most" in this context". The two exception noted were, in one case, a proprietary driver not widely available, the second being a very interesting driver that never achieved real production and distribution. d) Many crossover designs include inductors of various natures typed. Yes, but they, in and of themselves, do not necessarily contribute to the effective inductive behavior of the impedance curve. This last point is THE crucial one: regardless of what's under the hood, it's the resulting impedance curve that's the issue at hand. One can have parts that are inductive (or even inductors) in a circuit) that, overall, does NOT exhibit an inductive component to the impedance, and one can have a circuit that has NO inductors whatsoever whose impedance looks all the world like an inductor (the classic gyrator is one example). e) And those well-designed speakers that incorporate the exceptions will also account for those option. Yes, but the details of such may well be irrelevant in the current scheme of things. Comes down to the question of: Does driver/speaker inductance in *this* particular speaker coupled with *that* particular amplifier matter at *this* range of frequencies and volumes? Theory is all well and good, but how things operate in the real world at the living/listening room level are, or at least should, be the primary issue. Entirely agreed, and I would only emphasize the point by saying that it is certainly possible for one to find a exceptionally rare combination of things that support a particular thesis: such exceptions, contrary to the popular idiom, do NOT prove the rule: they simply demonstrate the ability to concoct a completely pathological exception. In following this thread, I did review Trevor's list of "pathological" (my use of the term) loudspeaker impedance curves to be found at Stereophile, and my overall reaction is that I find the situation they (these manufacturers) enumerate to be disturbingly irresponsible. With few exception, when I have been asked to consult on projects which exhibited these sorts of pathological; impedance curves, almost without exception, are the result of design imcompetence. There are ways of designing passive crossovers with the same electro-acoustic transfer functions that DO NOT have these same gross impedance anomalies. This is especially true of three-way, multi-order passive parallel ladder-type networks (which are the vast majority of such found in such multi-way systems). Designing a system that exhibits the kinds of impedance properties that lead to the sorts of issues discussed here is highly irresponsible and yet another sign of the technically insular nature of the high-end world. |
#42
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
Introducing a New Horse to the Stable
Mpffffff....
Now, we need to get into the difference between "accuracy" and "precision" - which for the record, are not even a little bit the same thing. Accuracy: A digital thermometer calibrated in two (2) degree Celsius increments, that is always with two degrees of the actual temperature is accurate - but not necessarily precise. Precision: A digital thermometer that is calibrated to six (6) decimal places of a degree, but is randomly somewhere between 4 and 8 degrees off the actual temperature is very precise. Not hardly accurate. Point being that good speaker design covers inductance, whether intentional or accidental (peculiar to the nature of the elements in use). DO, PLEASE look up the original definition of Peculiar. Peter Wieck Melrose Park, PA |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Deliberately introducing clipping? | Pro Audio | |||
A New Webzine: Introducing The Occidental Observer | Audio Opinions | |||
INTRODUCING | Marketplace | |||
what the hell is 2 ohm stable running parallel on 4ohm speakers so the amp "sees" 2 ohm speakers, the speakers still get half the power they would if it were 4 ohm stable | Car Audio | |||
introducing XOVISION | Marketplace |