Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.pro
gareth magennis gareth magennis is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 73
Default Pultec EQP clone problem

On Monday, 1 March 2021 at 14:29:10 UTC, Don Pearce wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 06:01:58 -0800 (PST), gareth magennis
wrote:

On Monday, 1 March 2021 at 10:12:40 UTC, Don Pearce wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 20:58:52 +1300, geoff
wrote:

On 1/03/2021 8:43 pm, Don Pearce wrote:
On Mon, 1 Mar 2021 12:48:16 +1300, geoff
wrote:

On 1/03/2021 8:55 am, Don Pearce wrote:
On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 04:31:33 -0800 (PST), "


Since you won't get off your lazy arse and do the work, I've done it
for you. Of course I knew precisely what the result would be before I
started, but it was a boring Sunday evening so here goes.

https://youtu.be/-hQgI0eCO08

d



I think a spectrum analyser display would have been more relevant.

geoff

No it would not. The screen I showed illustrated perfectly that there
was no selective harmonic boosting going on. That would have resulted
in a beat walking through the ring. A rock-solid, edge-induced ring is
what I intended to show, and that is exactly what I did show. Now, how
about addressing the result?

d


I would be curious to see the oredrs of harmonics and if they altered
over freq.

geoff
I've taken an FFT showing all the harmonics up to and beyond the
ringing frequency. The harmonic at the ringing frequency is marked.
Make of it what you will.

http://www.soundthoughts.co.uk/look/ringing.gif

The ring itself is of very short duration so despite its amplitude, it
contains very little energy compared to the harmonics which are
continuous. That is why it won't show up in the frequency domain
(unless the Q is so high that it continues at considerable amplitude
all the way to the next excitation). To see such a low energy signal
you have to choose the appropriate domain, the one in which it can be
isolated. That of course is time. I'm really disappointed that I have
to go though these hoops - they should not be necessary for a
technical audience.
d



--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus



These are screenshots of the Pultec clone ringing:
https://imgur.com/Ou0BGml

and with 100 Ohms in series with 0.01uF:
https://imgur.com/jaLv5Dz

Did you get those backwards? The one with the 100 ohms is much worse.
That first one though - pretty much identical to my tests. The FFT
would look identical for sure. I think I nailed it.

d


No I didn't get them backwards, I just assumed that the much larger initial overshoot would be more likely to cause the 90Hz issue than the longer ringing.

Don't know what that was based upon really, other than a guess.
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Dachman Audio U87 Clone Kit Paul Dorman Pro Audio 82 January 5th 21 02:50 AM
Good amps to clone Bret L Vacuum Tubes 0 April 25th 10 12:35 AM
WTB Waves Q-Clone License Haolemon Pro Audio 1 September 16th 07 08:26 AM
The clone marching on [email protected] Audio Opinions 5 August 23rd 07 05:23 AM
N72 1272 clone Studio Froombosch Pro Audio 0 March 31st 04 01:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:24 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"