You are building a very nice harrassment lawsuit against yourself.
Maybe Arny should call your banker and see if you own anything he
wants.

"Annika1980" wrote in message
oups.com...

Maybe Arny should call your banker and see if you own anything he
wants.


Yeah, that's exactly how banks work. Moron.

Dimmika said:

You are building a very nice harrassment lawsuit against yourself.
Maybe Arny should call your banker and see if you own anything he
wants.

Good idea. Let's bring everybody's "RAO career" into court and let the
chips fall where they may.

BTW, I heard you took dave's advice and tried putting with your ample
buttocks. How did that work out for you? ;-)

In , George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote :



Dimmika said:

You are building a very nice harrassment lawsuit against yourself.
Maybe Arny should call your banker and see if you own anything he
wants.

Good idea. Let's bring everybody's "RAO career" into court and let the
chips fall where they may.


Good !!! You sound like an experienced guy now !!!
This should be an encouragement for your gang of morons.



--
"Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?"

Dave Weil, Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15

"Trevor Wilson" wrote ...

**There is no such thing as nothingness. In our universe, there is always
something, somewhere. It may be matter, or energy.

**The universe always was. Before the Big Bang, the universe was smaller
and very different to what is here now.

ok. gotcha. something exploded becoming our universe as we know it.
this universe has a set of physical attributes. The thing that exploded
probably had a different set. One attribute was spontaneous banging.
cool.

surf said:

ok. gotcha. something exploded becoming our universe as we know it.
this universe has a set of physical attributes. The thing that exploded
probably had a different set. One attribute was spontaneous banging.
cool.

Mocking tone, noted.

How 'bout your theory? Is God an aged white man with a long beard,
ensconced on an eternal throne, surrounded by seraphs and pestered by
Satan?

"surf" wrote in message
...
"Trevor Wilson" wrote ...

**There is no such thing as nothingness. In our universe, there is always
something, somewhere. It may be matter, or energy.

**The universe always was. Before the Big Bang, the universe was smaller
and very different to what is here now.

ok. gotcha. something exploded becoming our universe as we know it.

**No. The universe EXPANDED (explosion is not really the correct term) and
is still expanding. The universe always was. It was just different to what
it is now. And now. And now. And now.

this universe has a set of physical attributes. The thing that exploded
probably had a different set.

**Maybe. We don't know enough, yet. Ascribing the unknown to the
supernatural is the province of a closed, primitive mind. We will eventually
uncover more detail about the early universe. Religion has no answers to
assist in uncovering what went before.

One attribute was spontaneous banging.
cool.

**Hot, actually. Very, very hot.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

"Lionel" wrote in message
...
Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :


"surf" wrote in message
...
"Clyde Slick" wrote

I'm not anti-religion, just an agnostic.


I thought you were Jewish........


sure, a Jewish agnostic, or an agnostic Jew.


Tsechmeister/Sackman is also a nudist but he doesn't practice. ;-)


Lionel is a Frenchman, and he practices every minute he can!

"Arny Krueger" wrote in message
...

If self-righteouness killed...



My money is still on the bus.

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 05:34:24 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:


**The universe always was. Before the Big Bang, the universe was smaller and
very different to what is here now.

Gee, Trevor, you don't look anywhere near that old.

On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 18:59:05 -0500, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:



surf said:

ok. gotcha. something exploded becoming our universe as we know it.
this universe has a set of physical attributes. The thing that exploded
probably had a different set. One attribute was spontaneous banging.
cool.

Mocking tone, noted.

How 'bout your theory? Is God an aged white man with a long beard,
ensconced on an eternal throne, surrounded by seraphs and pestered by
Satan?

I used to work with a guy who insisted that the existance of God had
been totally disproven. Intrigued by his confidence, since I hadn't
seen it on the news, I asked why. He replied that since several lots
of astronauts had been shot into space without observing any evidence
of God, God clearly did not exist. Well, what can one say in the face
of such irrefutable logic?

On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:26:34 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
wrote:

"paul packer" wrote in message


But you'd expect that, wouldn't you? I've just posted to
Phil Allison at aus.hi-fi wishing that he could look back
and see himself, and one could wish Arnie the same. Not
that I'm making comparisons--Phil is a far gone creature
without redeeming virtues, a pile of screaming paranioa.
Arnie can actually be a nice guy whern he chooses, and
probably is very kind to animals as well. However, the
nature of the self-blindness is the same.

If self-righteouness killed...

If you check my other posts, Arnie, you'll see one where I clearly
state that all psychiatric problems are merely extreme examples of
problems we all suffer from.

Combined with a total lack of self-consciousness, one simply
must laugh...

...or cry.

Why not do both? Exercise the facial muscles.

Here's a hint Paul - you're beginning to sound just like
Morein.

That's an insult?

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 06 Dec 2005 05:34:24 GMT, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:


**The universe always was. Before the Big Bang, the universe was smaller
and
very different to what is here now.

Gee, Trevor, you don't look anywhere near that old.

**I'm not old enough to have seen Jesus nailed to the cross, either.
Nonetheless, I acknowledge that it was a real event. Do you deny that Jesus
was nailed to a cross, just because you did not witness it?

I've never seen gamma radiation, either. I do not deny it's existence. Do
you?


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

George Minus Middius a écrit :


How 'bout your theory? Is God an aged white man with a long beard,
ensconced on an eternal throne, surrounded by seraphs and pestered by
Satan?

George is like a little boy.
His life is full of childish incarnations.




--
Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?

Dave Weil - Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 -0500

Clyde Slick a écrit :
"Lionel" wrote in message
...

Arthur "Sackman" Tsechmeister wrote :


"surf" wrote in message
...

"Clyde Slick" wrote

I'm not anti-religion, just an agnostic.


I thought you were Jewish........


sure, a Jewish agnostic, or an agnostic Jew.


Tsechmeister/Sackman is also a nudist but he doesn't practice. ;-)



Lionel is a Frenchman, and he practices every minute he can!


That's true, every minute I can.




--
Nobody seemes to have actaully read what i wrote.
But what's new around here?

Dave Weil - Sun, 05 Oct 2003 00:57:15 -0500

paul packer said:

**The universe always was. Before the Big Bang, the universe was smaller and
very different to what is here now.

Gee, Trevor, you don't look anywhere near that old.

Stop stalking RAOers, paulie. Get a life.

paul packer said:

How 'bout your theory? Is God an aged white man with a long beard,
ensconced on an eternal throne, surrounded by seraphs and pestered by
Satan?

I used to work with a guy who insisted that the existance of God had
been totally disproven. Intrigued by his confidence, since I hadn't
seen it on the news, I asked why. He replied that since several lots
of astronauts had been shot into space without observing any evidence
of God, God clearly did not exist. Well, what can one say in the face
of such irrefutable logic?

Awesome. For some reason it reminds me of Kroologic.

"Trevor Wilson" wrote in message
...
:
: "surf" wrote in message
: ...
: "Trevor Wilson" wrote ...
:
: **There is no such thing as nothingness. In our universe, there is always
: something, somewhere. It may be matter, or energy.
:
: +**The universe always was. Before the Big Bang, the universe was smaller
: and very different to what is here now.

+ nope that's nonsense. we have a hard time reasoning back to the first
instances of the Big Bang, -no way- *anything* can be said, based on
science that is, about a 'before'. In fact, stating it that way makes it clear,
your idea of the big bang is severely flawed.

time and space *started* with the Big Bang, so there _is no before_
is what science tells us.

:
: ok. gotcha. something exploded becoming our universe as we know it.
:
: **No. The universe EXPANDED (explosion is not really the correct term) and
: is still expanding.

correct.

+The universe always was. It was just different to what
: it is now. And now. And now. And now.
:
: this universe has a set of physical attributes. The thing that exploded
: probably had a different set.
:
: **Maybe. We don't know enough, yet. Ascribing the unknown to the
: supernatural is the province of a closed, primitive mind. We will eventually
: uncover more detail about the early universe. Religion has no answers to
: assist in uncovering what went before.

Maybe not, but science has neither - it's a full stop.
Rudy

: One attribute was spontaneous banging.
: cool.
:
: **Hot, actually. Very, very hot.
: )
: --
: Trevor Wilson

"paul packer" wrote in message
...
: On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 10:26:34 -0500, "Arny Krueger"
: wrote:
:
: If you check my other posts, Arnie, you'll see one where I clearly
: state that all psychiatric problems are merely extreme examples of
: problems we all suffer from.

uhmm proof it
packer in specific mode : no problem
packer in generalisation mode : big problem

:-)
R.

On Wed, 07 Dec 2005 08:17:35 -0500, George M. Middius cmndr
[underscore] george [at] comcast [dot] net wrote:


Stop stalking RAOers, paulie. Get a life.

This is it, George. Don't you recognise it?

On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 17:21:13 +0100, "Ruud Broens"
wrote:


: If you check my other posts, Arnie, you'll see one where I clearly
: state that all psychiatric problems are merely extreme examples of
: problems we all suffer from.

uhmm proof it
packer in specific mode : no problem
packer in generalisation mode : big problem

"Proof it?"

Are you saying that "psychiatric problems" are NOT merely extreme
examples of things we all suffer from? I'm not talking madness and
delusion here.