[[email protected]]

Hello there, I was wondering what sample rate engineers are recoding
at. I have been recording in pro tools at 44k and 24 bit for the past
three years. mostly pop,RnB, rap and blues bands. Is there an
advantage to tracking and mixing at 96 k?
Glenn.

[Roy W. Rising[_2_]]

wrote:
Hello there, I was wondering what sample rate engineers are recoding
at. I have been recording in pro tools at 44k and 24 bit for the past
three years. mostly pop,RnB, rap and blues bands. Is there an
advantage to tracking and mixing at 96 k?
Glenn.

As they say in court ... "Asked and answered" ... yesterday.

And, by the way, it's "versus". ;-)

--
~
~ Roy
"If you notice the sound, it's wrong!"

[[email protected]]

On Oct 25, 12:08*pm, Roy W. Rising
wrote:
wrote:
Hello there, I was wondering what sample rate engineers are recoding
at. I have been recording in pro tools at 44k and 24 bit for the past
three years. mostly pop,RnB, rap and blues bands. Is there an
advantage to *tracking and mixing at 96 k?
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Glenn.

As they say in court ... "Asked and answered" ... yesterday.

And, by the way, it's "versus". *;-)

--
~
~ Roy
"If you notice the sound, it's wrong!"

Sorry about the double post. My computer stopped updating saturday
night? Until today.

Glenn.