Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
rtweed rtweed is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10
Default Recommendations for an alternative to Audacity

I'd be interested to know what software you folks would recommend for
post-production of audio field recordings (eg of ensembles, bands,
orchestras etc) - I record onto either a computer or a Zoom H4N.

I've used two products:

- Audacity which, for almost all of the things I need to do, I really
like for its simple, effective and intuitive user interface.

- Cubase LE (which has come free with a couple of devices I've
purchased) which I have found to be totally unintuitive and
frustratingly complex for even the simplest of operations.

In fact the only two areas I find Audacity lets me down a

- its EQ which has to be done "batch mode" - ie you can't modify EQ
settings and hear the effect in real-time (apart from an all too short
and usually irrelevant preview period). Instead you have to apply the
settings to some or all of the track and then listen back to hear the
results

- it doesn't provide a decent reverb, and again you can't monitor its
settings in real-time

Cubase LE does provide a decent reverb (and many other plug in
alternative reverbs are readily available) and both these and EQ can
be monitored in real-time, which is great and exactly what I want.
However every time I try to figure out how to use Cubase I quickly get
to a state of frustration where I'm ready to throw the computer out
the window - as an IT professional, I can't believe how badly designed
it is and how poor the documentation is for the relatively simple
tasks I need it to perform.

So, if anyone has any suggestions for alternatives, I'll be very
interested: something with the wonderful ease and simplicity of
Audacity but with real-time EQ and reverb....or perhaps some Audacity
expert can tell me how to achieve my goal!

Rob
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Edmund[_2_] Edmund[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 80
Default Recommendations for an alternative to Audacity

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:25:53 +0000, rtweed wrote:

I'd be interested to know what software you folks would recommend for
post-production of audio field recordings (eg of ensembles, bands,
orchestras etc) - I record onto either a computer or a Zoom H4N.

I've used two products:

- Audacity which, for almost all of the things I need to do, I really
like for its simple, effective and intuitive user interface.

- Cubase LE (which has come free with a couple of devices I've
purchased) which I have found to be totally unintuitive and
frustratingly complex for even the simplest of operations.

In fact the only two areas I find Audacity lets me down a

- its EQ which has to be done "batch mode" - ie you can't modify EQ
settings and hear the effect in real-time (apart from an all too short
and usually irrelevant preview period). Instead you have to apply the
settings to some or all of the track and then listen back to hear the
results

- it doesn't provide a decent reverb, and again you can't monitor its
settings in real-time


Well since this group is called re.audio"high-end" I would suggest to stay
away from both reverb en EQ.
Both will destroy the high end part of what you recorded in the first place.


Edmund

Rob


  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Arny Krueger[_4_] Arny Krueger[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 854
Default Recommendations for an alternative to Audacity

"rtweed" wrote in message
...
I'd be interested to know what software you folks would recommend for
post-production of audio field recordings (eg of ensembles, bands,
orchestras etc) - I record onto either a computer or a Zoom H4N.



For many of us, the all-time classic audio editing tool is Cool Edit or Cool
Edit Pro.

Especially in the Cool Edit Pro 2.1 incarnation, it is still a highly
effective tool.

Sadly, Cool Edit was sold to Adobe who changed its name to Auditon, IMO it
hasn't exactly thrived under Adobe's stewardship. I bought the first two
pay-for release upgrades of Audition as well as the inital freebie, tried to
enjoy them, and eventually regressed to CEP 2.1.


  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Audio Empire Audio Empire is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,193
Default Recommendations for an alternative to Audacity

On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 10:25:53 -0700, rtweed wrote
(in article ):

I'd be interested to know what software you folks would recommend for
post-production of audio field recordings (eg of ensembles, bands,
orchestras etc) - I record onto either a computer or a Zoom H4N.

I've used two products:

- Audacity which, for almost all of the things I need to do, I really
like for its simple, effective and intuitive user interface.

- Cubase LE (which has come free with a couple of devices I've
purchased) which I have found to be totally unintuitive and
frustratingly complex for even the simplest of operations.

In fact the only two areas I find Audacity lets me down a

- its EQ which has to be done "batch mode" - ie you can't modify EQ
settings and hear the effect in real-time (apart from an all too short
and usually irrelevant preview period). Instead you have to apply the
settings to some or all of the track and then listen back to hear the
results

- it doesn't provide a decent reverb, and again you can't monitor its
settings in real-time

Cubase LE does provide a decent reverb (and many other plug in
alternative reverbs are readily available) and both these and EQ can
be monitored in real-time, which is great and exactly what I want.
However every time I try to figure out how to use Cubase I quickly get
to a state of frustration where I'm ready to throw the computer out
the window - as an IT professional, I can't believe how badly designed
it is and how poor the documentation is for the relatively simple
tasks I need it to perform.

So, if anyone has any suggestions for alternatives, I'll be very
interested: something with the wonderful ease and simplicity of
Audacity but with real-time EQ and reverb....or perhaps some Audacity
expert can tell me how to achieve my goal!

Rob


Actually, you have about hit the nail on the head. 'Audacity' does most
things more than adequately, and "Cubebase LE" is good for many of the bases
that 'Audacity' doesn't cover. You might also try "Garage Band" on the Mac
for some things but the best "not free" solution is Apple's 'Logic Express
9' music editing software. Of course, you need a Mac to run this stuff, but
if you're doing recording and editing on a computer, you should be using a
Mac anyway because that's where most of the tools are.
  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
Juan I. Cahis Juan I. Cahis is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2
Default Recommendations for an alternative to Audacity

Dear friends, for me the best is SoundForge, now from Sony.


[ Excessive quotation snipped -- dsr ]


Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Alternative to Soundminer Charles Adams Pro Audio 4 May 8th 09 10:41 PM
Upgrade from Audacity Recommendations? hfillmore Pro Audio 3 September 14th 07 08:51 AM
What is the alternative [email protected] High End Audio 90 October 29th 05 03:24 AM
alternative 703 bluesjeon Pro Audio 2 April 6th 05 04:49 PM
PS2 as a DVD alternative? Silver Car Audio 4 July 6th 04 12:32 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:29 AM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"