Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer Equalizer
you will want to listen to be sure, but in theory, you will introduce more
sampling noise if you put it in the output where volume controls affect the signal than in the input - what used to be standard practice was to take "tape out" and route that to the equalizer, and then take the equalizer output and send it to "tape in", in that manner you could bypass it or not and it saw a high level unattenuated signal. I have no clue if your technics device has such inputs/outputs but you may wish to consider checking for them or their equivalent. wrote in message ... I posted this once before to get some opinions but the thread got hijacked. Thought I'd try again and add high-end to see if anyone over there might have advice. I got a behringer 8024 equalizer I wanted to play around with. I'm still waiting for a mic cable I ordered before experimenting so I have not done anything yet. I'm not interested in hearing about the pro/cons/flaws/etc in attempting to equalize a room, thanks but please take it elsewhere. I'm using a technics surround sound processor (sh-ac500d) as a pre- amp / input selector. All my inputs to it are digital. It also is my volume control. The logical place to put the equalizer is after it of course. But that will be in the attenuated signal. I'm wondering if this is an issue because the behringer converts to digital internally? I'm using an active crossover with a couple adcoms downstream so I don't have any other good alternative volume controls. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.high-end
|
|||
|
|||
Behringer Equalizer
Thanks, I'm thinking that will be my problems as well. The surround sound
processor only has the 5 surround sound outputs, three digital inputs and a set of 5 pass through inputs. Nothing that would be considered a tape in/out. "William Noble" wrote in message ... you will want to listen to be sure, but in theory, you will introduce more sampling noise if you put it in the output where volume controls affect the signal than in the input - what used to be standard practice was to take "tape out" and route that to the equalizer, and then take the equalizer output and send it to "tape in", in that manner you could bypass it or not and it saw a high level unattenuated signal. I have no clue if your technics device has such inputs/outputs but you may wish to consider checking for them or their equivalent. wrote in message ... I posted this once before to get some opinions but the thread got hijacked. Thought I'd try again and add high-end to see if anyone over there might have advice. I got a behringer 8024 equalizer I wanted to play around with. I'm still waiting for a mic cable I ordered before experimenting so I have not done anything yet. I'm not interested in hearing about the pro/cons/flaws/etc in attempting to equalize a room, thanks but please take it elsewhere. I'm using a technics surround sound processor (sh-ac500d) as a pre- amp / input selector. All my inputs to it are digital. It also is my volume control. The logical place to put the equalizer is after it of course. But that will be in the attenuated signal. I'm wondering if this is an issue because the behringer converts to digital internally? I'm using an active crossover with a couple adcoms downstream so I don't have any other good alternative volume controls. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Behringer Equalizer | Tech | |||
Behringer Equalizer | High End Audio | |||
Behringer 8024 equalizer addition | Tech | |||
Behringer FBQ6200 31 Band Stereo Graphic Equalizer | Pro Audio | |||
Behringer FBQ6200 Ultra-Musical 31-Band Stereo Graphic Equalizer | Audio Opinions |