[George M. Middius[_4_]]

Barkety-barkety-yappety-yap.

I have a question for Scottie: In the past, you've denigrated people who
only earn enough to get by.

No, they only worked enough to get by. Once again your reading
skills
fall
far short
of your supposed writing
skills.

That's quite the gnat's hair of a difference you've defined. At what point
do you decide, in your great wisdom, that a person has worked enough but
not earned enough?

BTW, in which illustrious school of literature is crap like
bark bark yap yap considered quality?

Woof! Snarl! Growl-yap-yap!

Now you seem to be bitching about people who
try to increase their wages. So is it bad to settle for less, or is it bad
to strive for more?

Inability to answer a simple question noted. Of course, the question does
highlight the chaos that infuses your 'mind', so I'm not surprised you
snipped it before you bit your own ears off in a fit of White Male Anger.

[Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!]

On May 25, 7:34*pm, ScottW wrote:
On May 25, 5:27*pm, George M. Middius
wrote:

Barkety-barkety-yappety-yap.

I have a question for Scottie: In the past, you've denigrated people who
only earn enough to get by.

*No, they only worked enough to get by. *Once again your reading
* * * * * * skills
fall
far short
* * * * * * * * * of your supposed writing

* * * * * * * * * * * * * skills.

That's quite the gnat's hair of a difference you've defined.

*You should be ticked when people do that as it surely impacts
your benefits.

Is that what has caused your recent meltdowns, 2pid? Ticks? You can
get collars that are very inexpensive which will treat your ticks
quite effectively.

Now why would you wish your tick infestation on George? That certainly
doesn't speak well for your integrity.