Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
any advice on small DAT recorder ?
hi guys -
I"m a singer for a small acoustic quartet, and im wanting to buy a small hand-held Digital Audio recorder, for recording practice sessions live, so I can sing back against vocals & work on harmonies, etc. im not looking for "studio sound" here, but just a good approximation of live music. any other bells and whistles would be nice but not neccessary, like xlr/quarter inch ins and outs, USB computer hookup, MP3-making ability, etc. whatever it is should have decent built-in mikes and possibly common storage card (ie flash card) compatibility. thanks for any review or advice from experienced users !!?? banshee |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
any advice on small DAT recorder ?
On May 30, 9:37 pm, "Ban Shee" wrote:
hi guys - I"m a singer for a small acoustic quartet, and im wanting to buy a small hand-held Digital Audio recorder, for recording practice sessions live, so I can sing back against vocals & work on harmonies, etc. I've read many nice things about the Zoom products, specifically the H4 and now the H2. Have a look at: http://www.americanmusical.com/item--i-ZOO-H4.html http://www.americanmusical.com/item--i-ZOO-H2.html Apparently very good performance specs for the money. EJ |
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
any advice on small DAT recorder ?
"Ban Shee" wrote in message
news:uxq7i.62269$V75.5193@edtnps89 hi guys - I"m a singer for a small acoustic quartet, and im wanting to buy a small hand-held Digital Audio recorder, for recording practice sessions live, so I can sing back against vocals & work on harmonies, etc. im not looking for "studio sound" here, but just a good approximation of live music. any other bells and whistles would be nice but not neccessary, like xlr/quarter inch ins and outs, USB computer hookup, MP3-making ability, etc. whatever it is should have decent built-in mikes and possibly common storage card (ie flash card) compatibility. thanks for any review or advice from experienced users !!?? My M-Audio MT 2496s seems to get the job done. I have a couple of friends with them, and we're all pretty happy. They come with a pretty fair stereo mic, and use standard CF cards. They also have TRS input jacks for both line level and mic use. My last portable digital recorder had only a 3.5 mm line level input jack which got intermittant after a few years, so a mic/line input on TRS jacks is a big plus to me. Caveat 1: There seem to be a lot of MT2496s for sale with downlevel firmware. Just lately the MT firmware was updated to make MT2496s far more tolerant of different brands of CF cards. I had to update my MT, and one belonging to a friend. Caveat 2: It is not uncommon for portable digital recorders to provide less than standard 48 volt phantom power. The MT puts out something like 30 volts which works with just about any mic, but it ain't perfect. Caveat 3: The MT's range of gain adjustement is less than what you'd see on a good mic preamp. The gain can be less than optimal for some mics in some situations. I've encountered line-level sources that ended up causing clipping. The usual work-around is to simply make up any too-low recorded levels in post. Usually some adjustments elsewhere will get excessive input levels down, or add a passive attenuator. Caveat 4: Battery life isn't a strong point on the MT. It can run on battery power for like 2 hours, but you need an external power source for longer gigs. Using phantom power and enabling the display's backlight hurts battery life, as you can well imagine. |
#4
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
any advice on small DAT recorder ?
"DAT"... that's so ancient! Tape is dead. You want a flash drive
recorder like an Alesis Microtrack 24/96. Dr. Evil "I'm going to ask for a ransom of One....*million* dollars!" Uh...prices have gone up since you've been frozen.... "O.K. One hundred *billion* dollars!" |
#5
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
any advice on small DAT recorder ?
hi folks, thanks for your input on the mini audio recorders.
the Zoom H4 and Boss Micro BR look quite decent. The Boss Micro seems to include FX + drum machine; whereas the H4 boasts 4x 24x96 recording at-once, with Cubase LE and pro-style inputs (XLR + 1/4"). Does anyone haveany comments on the quality of the on-board FX or mic's in these units ..? thanks "Ban Shee" wrote in message news:uxq7i.62269$V75.5193@edtnps89... hi guys - I"m a singer for a small acoustic quartet, and im wanting to buy a small hand-held Digital Audio recorder, for recording practice sessions live, so I can sing back against vocals & work on harmonies, etc. im not looking for "studio sound" here, but just a good approximation of live music. any other bells and whistles would be nice but not neccessary, like xlr/quarter inch ins and outs, USB computer hookup, MP3-making ability, etc. whatever it is should have decent built-in mikes and possibly common storage card (ie flash card) compatibility. thanks for any review or advice from experienced users !!?? banshee |
#6
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
any advice on small DAT recorder ?
On Sun, 03 Jun 2007 09:08:06 +0000, Ban Shee wrote:
hi folks, thanks for your input on the mini audio recorders. the Zoom H4 and Boss Micro BR look quite decent. The Boss Micro seems to include FX + drum machine; whereas the H4 boasts 4x 24x96 recording at-once, with Cubase LE and pro-style inputs (XLR + 1/4"). Does anyone haveany comments on the quality of the on-board FX or mic's in these units ..? I was looking for a little recorder for a while too. After trying the Edirol R1, Zoom H4 and the Micro BR I went for the Micro BR and am very pleased with it. It's easy to use, the display is big and bright and it does what I need. The internal mic is only good enough for quick ideas really, but it is at least good enough. A little sony stereo mic sounds fine if I need more quality. It will do 16 bit 44.1khz recording. I don't think any of these budget recorders really benefit from greater resolution, considering their internal preamps and AD converters. Like it's peers has a weird gain structure and metering that lies. Beginners would be better off with something simpler and more predictable like a Sound Devices 722. A bit of experimentation with test tones and I got the hang of it. There is one effects unit that can be used in various places. As an input effect (monitor only: dry to track), input effect (wet to track), insert on any track or stereo pair, effects send, or across the master bus. The effects unit can be a chain of a few different processors, all of which can be edited. The effects sound pretty good, as does the drum box. The amp simulators are a bit cheesy, though they all outclass the Zoom H4. The four track is quite astonishing for something so small. Eight virtual tracks per track, non linear editing (between takes on the same track too), bounce forward, effects sends and insert etc. You could record an album on it. I found myself getting annoyed there was no automation. In the 4 track mode, either the data compression or the "Adaptive Focus" a/d does something to the recording. There is a halo of noise that follows decaying notes on an acoustic guitar. It's not particularly annoying as an artifact. For straight forward recording the other ones may be better, for a musician the Micro BR is the most fun. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Small digital audio recorder? | Pro Audio | |||
Small Sub for Car Need Advice | Car Audio | |||
Need advice for a small 4 channel amp. | Car Audio | |||
Small digital recorder | Pro Audio | |||
PA System for small church - advice please ? | Pro Audio |