Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
I love the ease and conviencne of digital recording. It also sounds good,
but analog tape pushed, sounds better. Would it make sense to record to digital, then push the mixdown to tape, then back to digital? For that analog sound? Thanks Dave |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
DaveDrummer wrote:
I love the ease and conviencne of digital recording. It also sounds good, but analog tape pushed, sounds better. Would it make sense to record to digital, then push the mixdown to tape, then back to digital? For that analog sound? Thanks Only your ears can make that determination. If it's any consolation, plenty of people are buying old analog machines for that very purpose. Don't think you were the first to come up with that idea! Artie Dave |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
In article , "DaveDrummer"
writes: I love the ease and conviencne of digital recording. It also sounds good, but analog tape pushed, sounds better. Would it make sense to record to digital, then push the mixdown to tape, then back to digital? For that analog sound? Thanks Thats one idea. Some people also record first to analog and then later mix in digi. Others take their final mix done to digital and transfer it to analog to master it. I suspect there are differences in the way things sound depending on what stage the A/D or D/A conversion is done at. Garth~ "I think the fact that music can come up a wire is a miracle." Ed Cherney |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
It also sounds good, but analog tape pushed, sounds better. Would it make
sense to record to digital, then push the mixdown to tape, then back to digital? That is what many people do. Record didgtal and mix to analog tape. Many other people track analog and transfer to digial for overdubbing and again mix to analog. Some track digital, transfer the drums to an analog machine druing mix and lock the machine to the digital and mix to whatever. There are many many ways to do this. --------------------------------------- "I know enough to know I don't know enough" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
well, I have no money now to spend on this stuff now anyway, but just
curious. What would be a suitable tape deck to do this type of thing? Dave "DaveDrummer" wrote in message ... I love the ease and conviencne of digital recording. It also sounds good, but analog tape pushed, sounds better. Would it make sense to record to digital, then push the mixdown to tape, then back to digital? For that analog sound? Thanks Dave |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
Ampex MM1200
-- Steven Sena XS Sound Recording www.xssound.com "DaveDrummer" wrote in message ... well, I have no money now to spend on this stuff now anyway, but just curious. What would be a suitable tape deck to do this type of thing? Dave "DaveDrummer" wrote in message ... I love the ease and conviencne of digital recording. It also sounds good, but analog tape pushed, sounds better. Would it make sense to record to digital, then push the mixdown to tape, then back to digital? For that analog sound? Thanks Dave |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Would this make any sense
In article ,
DaveDrummer wrote: I love the ease and conviencne of digital recording. It also sounds good, but analog tape pushed, sounds better. Would it make sense to record to digital, then push the mixdown to tape, then back to digital? For that analog sound? Thanks It's often a different thing to squish each individual track than it is to squish an entire mix. If you want to track analog, then track analog. It's not the same as tracking digital and mixing analog. Regards, Monte McGuire |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
rec.audio.car FAQ (Part 3/5) | Car Audio | |||
Google Proof of Unprovoked Personal Attack from McKelvy | Audio Opinions | |||
Whence "gig"? | Pro Audio | |||
do you make your own cds? | Pro Audio | |||
Converters make the difference? | Pro Audio |