Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Searching schematics to build figure eight mic with Panasonic capsules
Marc wrote:
I'm searching schematics to build a figure eight mic with Pansonic capsules (omni). You can't do this. You cannot measure velocity with a device designed to measure pressure. What interest me is how to wire the 2 capsules for balanced output and how to phantom power the capsules (48v) since I know one capsule must be out of phase and the voltage must be reduced to 9 volts. If you put two omnis out of phase at the same location, what you get is no output at all. If you put them in phase a few inches away, what you get is a comb filter. You can sort of get a figure-8 mike with digital delay on one channel, and summing, but it doesn't work very well at all. There were a couple articles at the Amsterdam AES show on the subject. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Searching schematics to build figure eight mic with Panasoniccapsules
Scott Dorsey wrote: Marc wrote: I'm searching schematics to build a figure eight mic with Pansonic capsules (omni). You can't do this. You cannot measure velocity with a device designed to measure pressure. Actually you can. The time integral of the difference between two omni's spaced closer than about a quarter of the smallest wavelength of interest is the velocity component along the axis connecting the omni's. This is called an "intensity probe". The problem in doing it in this fashion is that it greatly amplifies any self noise of the two capsules in inverse proportion to frequency because of the integration required. You can live with this if you are using such a device, for example, to measure impulse responses because you can average the noise out with slow sweeps but it makes a lousy method for sound recording. Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Searching schematics to build figure eight mic with Panasoniccapsules
Bob Cain wrote:
Scott Dorsey wrote: Marc wrote: I'm searching schematics to build a figure eight mic with Pansonic capsules (omni). You can't do this. You cannot measure velocity with a device designed to measure pressure. Actually you can. The time integral of the difference between two omni's spaced closer than about a quarter of the smallest wavelength of interest is the velocity component along the axis connecting the omni's. This is called an "intensity probe". The problem in doing it in this fashion is that it greatly amplifies any self noise of the two capsules in inverse proportion to frequency because of the integration required. You can live with this if you are using such a device, for example, to measure impulse responses because you can average the noise out with slow sweeps but it makes a lousy method for sound recording. There are some folks who have actually tried this for recording, but the problem is that it's hard to make the thing reasonably wideband. As I said before, there are a couple papers in the last AES conference proceedings about doing this and the response plots they show... well, they aren't very good off-axis, on top of the noise issue. For measurement stuff, it's a different story, yes. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Searching schematics to build figure eight mic with Panasoniccapsules
Scott Dorsey wrote: There are some folks who have actually tried this for recording, but the problem is that it's hard to make the thing reasonably wideband. As I said before, there are a couple papers in the last AES conference proceedings about doing this and the response plots they show... well, they aren't very good off-axis, on top of the noise issue. Yes, and those last two issues are inversely related. The configuration is only good off axis to the extent the omni's are in fact omni in a frequency independant way. This dictates very small diaphragms which has the unfortunate consequence of inherently high molecular shot noise which goes up with the inverse of the diaphragm diameter. There seems to be some sort of gotcha with mic design no matter what direction you go in. :-) Bob -- "Things should be described as simply as possible, but no simpler." A. Einstein |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Searching schematics to build figure eight mic with Panasonic capsules
I know Paia is making an MS mic. This mic use 3 capsules, one for Mid, and 2 for side. Is this mic not a real MS? Can I use cardioid capsules to make an eigth mic? In phase, out ot phase? (I will use this eight mic as a Side mic in a MS system) Two cardioid microphones back to back out of POLARITY (get the terminology right) will produce a figure 8. Neumann Km 86 does this with two Km 84 capsules. Matching of the capsules is extremely important. Richard H. Kuschel "I canna change the law of physics."-----Scotty |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Searching for high-quality passive filters 60hz 12db-octave (build my own?) | Car Audio | |||
Searching schematics to build figure eight mic with Panasoniccapsules | Pro Audio | |||
FS: AKG C-501E / C-502E Electret Condenser Microphones, 3 Extra Capsules | Pro Audio |