Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Leaving half a dual triode dark?
Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
There is the triode/dual diode 6AV6. Just don't use its "detector"
sections. It is a small, nice Septal tube which You can get as NOS RCA or eq. for a few dollars. Its triode section is almost 100% half of an ECC83/12AX7. See http://store.yahoo.com/triodeel/6av6.html As per Your question, well, You just waste 50% of Your tube, but it works. Ciao Fabio "John Byrns" ha scritto nel messaggio ... Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
John Byrns wrote: Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. Patrick Turner. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Patrick Turner
wrote: John Byrns wrote: Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? Because the object is to find a tube that consumes half the heater power of a 12AX7. Maybe I should drop the experimental monoblock idea and go back to a full stereo version, then the 12AX7 heater would cease to be a problem. A solution for the monoblock would be if there were 100 mA heater versions of both the 12AX7 and the 12AU7, I have a vague remembrance that there is a 100 mA heater variation of the 12AX7, but I have never heard of a 12AU7 variation like this. A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. The 6AV6 consumes the same amount of heater power as a 12AX7, this does not meet the goal. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Hi John ,
There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? Because the object is to find a tube that consumes half the heater power of a 12AX7 Assuming Patrick is right (and I don't see why not) I would use system "A" in monoblock "A" and system "B" in monoblock "B" . If you swap both 12AX7 's after 5 years you'll have fresh tubes again . Ronald . |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
John Byrns wrote:
In article , Patrick Turner wrote: John Byrns wrote: Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? Because the object is to find a tube that consumes half the heater power of a 12AX7. Maybe I should drop the experimental monoblock idea and go back to a full stereo version, then the 12AX7 heater would cease to be a problem. A solution for the monoblock would be if there were 100 mA heater versions of both the 12AX7 and the 12AU7, I have a vague remembrance that there is a 100 mA heater variation of the 12AX7, but I have never heard of a 12AU7 variation like this. A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. The 6AV6 consumes the same amount of heater power as a 12AX7, this does not meet the goal. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ John, If heater power is a problem why not use a 6AQ6 which is like a 6AV6 with a 150 mA heater. It may be hard to find now though. Regards, Bill Cohn |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. The 6AV6 consumes the same amount of heater power as a 12AX7, this does not meet the goal. There's the 6AQ6. which consumes 150ma at 6.3V for the heater. It isn't exactly half a 12AX7 though, but looks to be half a 5751 (mu=70, gm=1200, Rp=58K). Can you work with that? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
John Byrns wrote:
In article , Patrick Turner wrote: John Byrns wrote: Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? Because the object is to find a tube that consumes half the heater power of a 12AX7. Maybe I should drop the experimental monoblock idea and go back to a full stereo version, then the 12AX7 heater would cease to be a problem. A solution for the monoblock would be if there were 100 mA heater versions of both the 12AX7 and the 12AU7, I have a vague remembrance that there is a 100 mA heater variation of the 12AX7, but I have never heard of a 12AU7 variation like this. A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. The 6AV6 consumes the same amount of heater power as a 12AX7, this does not meet the goal. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ An alternative might be a 6BH6 Triode connected. See http://frank.pocnet.net/sheets/093/6/6BH6.pdf for a plot of triode curves. Looks like Triode MU is approx 50. Cheers, John Stewart |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"John Byrns" wrote in message ... In article , Patrick Turner wrote: John Byrns wrote: Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? Because the object is to find a tube that consumes half the heater power of a 12AX7. Maybe I should drop the experimental monoblock idea and go back to a full stereo version, then the 12AX7 heater would cease to be a problem. A solution for the monoblock would be if there were 100 mA heater versions of both the 12AX7 and the 12AU7, I have a vague remembrance that there is a 100 mA heater variation of the 12AX7, but I have never heard of a 12AU7 variation like this. A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. The 6AV6 consumes the same amount of heater power as a 12AX7, this does not meet the goal. Regards, John Byrns 7C6 JB, Loctal though and \more like a 6SQ7. Has the rump rump mu of 100 but gm of~1000. 'bout $10- $11 ea. from the usual sources. 150 mA heater. Are you THAT limited on heater power? MarkS tube manual junkie\ |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
John Byrns wrote:
In article , Patrick Turner wrote: John Byrns wrote: Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? Because the object is to find a tube that consumes half the heater power of a 12AX7. Maybe I should drop the experimental monoblock idea and go back to a full stereo version, then the 12AX7 heater would cease to be a problem. A solution for the monoblock would be if there were 100 mA heater versions of both the 12AX7 and the 12AU7, I have a vague remembrance that there is a 100 mA heater variation of the 12AX7, That would be the 20EZ7. But that needs a whole 20 volts, too much I think for what you have in mind. Another dual high MU triode with a 150 ma heater & lots of zip is the 17EW8. Part of the 6BK7, 6BQ7, 6BZ7 family. I've found the 6BQ7 types very good for audio when properly applied. JLS but I have never heard of a 12AU7 variation like this. A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. The 6AV6 consumes the same amount of heater power as a 12AX7, this does not meet the goal. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
John Byrns wrote: In article , Patrick Turner wrote: John Byrns wrote: Hi All, I am need of a single triode similar to half of a 12AX7. Unfortunately there does not seem to be a tube that contains only as single triode of the 12AX7 type, in the way that a 6C4 is like half a 12AU7. Would connecting only half the heater of a 12AX7, and leaving the second half of the heater dark cause any problems with the tube? There are no problems using just half a 12AX7. But why not parallel the halves? Because the object is to find a tube that consumes half the heater power of a 12AX7. Maybe I should drop the experimental monoblock idea and go back to a full stereo version, then the 12AX7 heater would cease to be a problem. A solution for the monoblock would be if there were 100 mA heater versions of both the 12AX7 and the 12AU7, I have a vague remembrance that there is a 100 mA heater variation of the 12AX7, but I have never heard of a 12AU7 variation like this. A 6AV6 will have a single 12AX7 half, and have a 7 pin miniature base. It has two diodes, and was used in countless valve radios. The 6AV6 consumes the same amount of heater power as a 12AX7, this does not meet the goal. Fair enough. Saving 0.945 watts is important. Patrick Turner. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Fair enough.
Saving 0.945 watts is important. That's what I thought at first , but ....... What if he wants to heat the (first) pre-amp tube with Ic of his power tubes ?? DC heating for free ;-)) Ronald . |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Ronald"
wrote: Fair enough. Saving 0.945 watts is important. That's what I thought at first , but ....... What if he wants to heat the (first) pre-amp tube with Ic of his power tubes ?? DC heating for free ;-)) Ronald . A gold star for Ronald! Not only do I want to heat the (first) "pre-amp" tube, actually the phase inverter, with DC from the output stage cathodes, but also the driver tube. There is a total of 200 mA available for the job, and I would like to hold the voltage drop to 20 volts at the outside. With a 6211 driver and say a 6AQ6 as the phase inverter, the total voltage for both tubes in series is 18.9 volts at 150 mA, which is within reason. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Sander deWaal said:
(John Byrns) said: A gold star for Ronald! Not only do I want to heat the (first) "pre-amp" tube, actually the phase inverter, with DC from the output stage cathodes, but also the driver tube. There is a total of 200 mA available for the job, and I would like to hold the voltage drop to 20 volts at the outside. With a 6211 driver and say a 6AQ6 as the phase inverter, the total voltage for both tubes in series is 18.9 volts at 150 mA, which is within reason. How about an EBC81/ 6BD7? http://4tubes.com/All-Files/datashee...tml/EBC81.html ARGH! Make that UBC81/ 14G6. http://tdsl.duncanamps.com/show.php?des=UBC81 -- "Audio as a serious hobby is going down the tubes." - Howard Ferstler, 25/4/2005 |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
John Byrns wrote:
In article , "Ronald" wrote: Fair enough. Saving 0.945 watts is important. That's what I thought at first , but ....... What if he wants to heat the (first) pre-amp tube with Ic of his power tubes ?? DC heating for free ;-)) Ronald . A gold star for Ronald! Not only do I want to heat the (first) "pre-amp" tube, actually the phase inverter, with DC from the output stage cathodes, but also the driver tube. There is a total of 200 mA available for the job, and I would like to hold the voltage drop to 20 volts at the outside. With a 6211 driver and say a 6AQ6 as the phase inverter, the total voltage for both tubes in series is 18.9 volts at 150 mA, which is within reason. Regards, John Byrns Surf my web pages at, http://users.rcn.com/jbyrns/ If you have 20 volts & 200 ma, why not a pair of 20EZ7's? That way you have two double triodes to work with. JLS |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Dual Classics Website Evolves | Tech | |||
FS: Audio Cables & Adapter Cables | Pro Audio | |||
List of NOS mostly tubes | Vacuum Tubes | |||
help wiring dual bandpass (Dual XB210D)to amp (Dual XAF460) | Car Audio | |||
Tannoy System 10 Dual Concentric Studio Monitors | Pro Audio |