[John-Melb]

On Nov 17, 11:49*am, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

[atec7 7]

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.
Yes twevy is a slow learner
he is also an utter dick

[kreed]

On Nov 18, 11:57 am, atec7 7 "atec wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

Yes twevy is a slow learner
he is also an utter dick

indeed

[Trevor Wilson]

"John-Melb" wrote in message
...
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed gun
control laws.


Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

**Asked and answered.


The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

**Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
important.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 2:33*pm, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:
"John-Melb" wrote in message

...
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"

wrote:
**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.

SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed gun
control laws.


You describe gun laws which require the same level of control for
anitque pinfires as for a Luger or Colt Automatic, laws which place
muzzleloaded shotguns in a differing, harder to obtain, "category" to
breach loading shotguns, laws which based the security levels for
ammuntion not on the type or quality of ammunition, but on the licence
under which the ammunition is owned, laws which caused the destruction
of over 600,000 lawfully owned sporting firearms, but appear unable to
stop criminal gans obtaining Glocks, as "strong, homogeneous, well
supported and policed gun control laws."

Fascinating, and certainly illustrative of your ignorance of the
subject matter.

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

**Asked and answered.

Really, I must have missed it, care to provide a cite?

Betcha can't


The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

**Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
important.


So you still haven't worked out what "anti-gun" means in common
discussion, despite describing yourself as "not anti-gun" ? You
really do struggle with reality, dear fellow, stay away from lead for
another decade or three and things might improve for you.

"Guns are not the problem" good, I'll quote you on that........

Tell us again about your friend who can STOP his heart


--
Trevor Wilsonwww.rageaudio.com.au

[Trevor Wilson]

"John-Melb" wrote in message
...
On Nov 18, 2:33 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:
"John-Melb" wrote in message

...
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"

wrote:
**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.

SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you
can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed
gun
control laws.


You describe gun laws which require the same level of control for
anitque pinfires as for a Luger or Colt Automatic, laws which place
muzzleloaded shotguns in a differing, harder to obtain, "category" to
breach loading shotguns, laws which based the security levels for
ammuntion not on the type or quality of ammunition, but on the licence
under which the ammunition is owned, laws which caused the destruction
of over 600,000 lawfully owned sporting firearms, but appear unable to
stop criminal gans obtaining Glocks, as "strong, homogeneous, well
supported and policed gun control laws."

Fascinating, and certainly illustrative of your ignorance of the
subject matter.

**I did not fully describe the differences between US and Austrlian gun
control laws. You are far too stupid to understand them, so I won't bother.
The differences are profound and deep, along with very good policing of
those laws in Australia.

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

**Asked and answered.

Really, I must have missed it, care to provide a cite?

**Look up.


Betcha can't

**Moron.


The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

**Nope, but you sure are. Guns are not the problem. The idiot holding the
gun may well be, however. In that sense, gun control laws are very
important.


So you still haven't worked out what "anti-gun" means in common
discussion, despite describing yourself as "not anti-gun" ?

**On the contrary, it is YOU who has failed miserably to explain what is
meant by the term: anti-gun.

You
really do struggle with reality, dear fellow, stay away from lead for
another decade or three and things might improve for you.

"Guns are not the problem" good, I'll quote you on that........

**Keep it in context and quote in full, moron.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 3:43*pm, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:
"John-Melb" wrote in message

...
On Nov 18, 2:33 pm, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:





"John-Melb" wrote in message

....
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"

wrote:
**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.

SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

**Sure. I DON'T CARE ABOUT GUNS. I typed it in caps in the hope that you
can
understand. I care about strong, homogeneous, well supported and policed
gun
control laws.

You describe gun laws which require the same level of control for
anitque pinfires as for a Luger or Colt Automatic, laws which place
muzzleloaded shotguns in a differing, harder to obtain, "category" to
breach loading shotguns, laws which based the security levels for
ammuntion not on the type or quality of ammunition, but on the licence
under which the ammunition is owned, laws which caused the destruction
of over 600,000 lawfully owned sporting firearms, but appear unable to
stop criminal gans obtaining Glocks, as "strong, homogeneous, well
supported and policed gun control laws."

Fascinating, and certainly illustrative of your ignorance of the
subject matter.

**I did not fully describe the differences between US and Austrlian gun
control laws. You are far too stupid to understand them, so I won't bother.

[the watcher]

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 17, 11:49 am, "Trevor Wilson"
wrote:

**Me, anti-gun? Nope. I don't care about guns, one way or the other.
SNIP

That would have to be the funniest thing I've read in a very long
time.

OK, Trevor explain the 7,000 + posts you've made on gun related forums
over the past decade if you "don't care about guns"

Explain you habit of posting O/T anti-gun rants on places like
rec.audio.opinion, aus,hi-fi and aus.electronics if you "don't care
about guns"

The interesting thing is, Trevor claims he's not "anti-gun" this must
mean he's finally worked out what "anti-gun" is, took him long emough.
He's a slow learner, must be the lead thing.

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 4:08*pm, the watcher ""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
wrote:

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
posts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
viewpoint appears?

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

[the watcher]

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher ""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
wrote:

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
posts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
viewpoint appears?

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

perhaps you might try usenetrules/etiquette like most of us do but as I
posted, whatever tw did,you have confirmed that as I stated in your case
it is truly sbout pot,kettle,black
DrPatric

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 4:24*pm, the watcher ""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
wrote:

perhaps you might try usenetrules/etiquette like most of us do but as I
posted, whatever tw did,you have confirmed that as I stated in your case
it is truly sbout pot,kettle,black
DrPatric

So, I'm correct in assuming you never complained about Trevor
Tosspot's inanae anti-gun rants appearing on aus.hi-fi but are now
sooking about alternative viewpoint on the same forum?

[KeithR]

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher ""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
wrote:

you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
Professionally yours
Dr Patric

Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
posts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
viewpoint appears?

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.


Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

[John-Melb]

On Nov 18, 8:24*pm, keithr wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

How is Dorothy, by the way?

[Bret L]

After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

R.a.o. has no on topic, everything BUT audio is fair game.

Gun control is people control, ultimately. Moreover, and more to the
point, it's about who has the guns and may do what to whom.

Gun control took over in Australia when that effectively small island
nation became in effect a vaginocracy. Female rule is the rule of
abstract notions of safety and security which are often at great
variance with reality, very especially when that reality is filtered
by the usual suspects-a media of mass information and entertainment
dedicated to the growth of big, overwhelming state control by special
interests.

John Knox wrote a diatribe in 1558 against feminocracy, and to those
of us who do not hold the tenets of Christianity as literal truth, it
may seem ridiculous today. However, in his day, Christianity was still
Western Christianity, adapted to his peculiar people, and ours (I
presume here that Australian readers are, at least overwhelmingly, of
European descent). Therefore, I believe a reading of his text will
still have some validity to us half a millennium later.

The majority of females in Australia may not have a great interest in
gun control per se one way or another: some will undoubtedly and
sensibly feel they should be allowed to carry a firearm in the cities
as protection against crime, and rural ones may even more think that
anyone in a country such as Australia, with its lethal fauna in
abundance, should be carrying an effective firearm. But that isn't the
point. Organized feminist doctrine wants men disarmed so they are at
the mercy of the Nanny State in all things, in which feminists,
sodomites, halfwits, and members of influential alien minorities have
disproportionate if not absolute control.

The feminine spirit has had disproportionate sway in Australia for
most of a century. The basic mentality is that of "cutting down the
tall poppies", of enforced egalitarianism, of an over powering
atmosphere of Scargill mentality trade unionism and a contempt of
anyone who would change the extant order for good or ill, except to
the extent those wanting change could enforce the widespread universal
propaganda that this or that particular change was really staying the
same, that keeping things as they were would really be to change even
more fundamental values.

Of course, this has propagated through the entire Western world in
much the same fashion. In my nation, or what is left of it, we fancy
ourselves the lone holdout, but that can't last forever. It has
already broken down in a great number of ways. In my opinion,
regaining manly virtue is key to our survival as a people everywhere
our people dwell.

[Jeßus[_3_]]

In article 8225cabc-2846-45e9-8ce1-1e35eb256494
@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com, said...
:
:On Nov 18, 4:08*pm, the watcher ""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
:wrote:
:
: you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
: for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
: usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
: group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
: Professionally yours
: Dr Patric
:
:Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
:launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
osts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
:viewpoint appears?
:
:After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

You really are a ****wit.
And I suspect, an anti-gun nut in disguise.

[Trevor Wilson]

"Bret L" wrote in message
...


After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

R.a.o. has no on topic, everything BUT audio is fair game.

Gun control is people control, ultimately.

**No Bret. It is GUN CONTROL. Nothing more, nothing less. People control
would be, well, people control. Gun control, or more correctly, gun control
LAWS, is all about controlling the sale and use of guns in society. Continue
with your lies, if that makes you happy however.

Moreover, and more to the
point, it's about who has the guns and may do what to whom.

**Partly. It's also about storage, sale, distribution and what penalties can
be applied to violators of the law.


Gun control took over in Australia when that effectively small island
nation became in effect a vaginocracy.

**"Vaginocracy"? My dictionary lacks a definition for that term. You'd best
explain it. In your explanation, you may care to note the following:

* Females may and, indeed, do, own guns in the US and in Australia.
* 90% of the Australian population approved of the 1996 gun control laws.
* The Federal government that proposed the 1996 gun control laws was
returned to government several times, AFTER the laws were enacted.
* Australia is the largest island (or the smallest continent, depending on
classification) on the planet.
* I invite you to come to Australia anytime you choose (at your cost), so
you may repeat your inferences about Australian Democratic traditions at a
place and time of my choosing. I fully expect that you, being a gutless,
cowardly scum-bag, will refuse my invitation.

Female rule is the rule of
abstract notions of safety and security which are often at great
variance with reality, very especially when that reality is filtered
by the usual suspects-a media of mass information and entertainment
dedicated to the growth of big, overwhelming state control by special
interests.

**Although the Deputy Prime Minister of Australia is a female (and a highly
capable, intelligent one, at that), Australia has never had a female PM.
Unlike the US, we do not have a strong group, like the NRA, to pervert our
Democratic system. The PEOPLE get to judge what happens.


John Knox wrote a diatribe in 1558 against feminocracy,

**Nope. Not in my dictionary either. I understand that along with your
extreme xenophobic ideals, that you are also a misogynist.

and to those
of us who do not hold the tenets of Christianity as literal truth, it
may seem ridiculous today. However, in his day, Christianity was still
Western Christianity, adapted to his peculiar people, and ours (I
presume here that Australian readers are, at least overwhelmingly, of
European descent). Therefore, I believe a reading of his text will
still have some validity to us half a millennium later.

**Not to those of us who value males and females, of any colour skin as
equals.


The majority of females in Australia may not have a great interest in
gun control per se one way or another: some will undoubtedly and
sensibly feel they should be allowed to carry a firearm in the cities
as protection against crime, and rural ones may even more think that
anyone in a country such as Australia, with its lethal fauna in
abundance, should be carrying an effective firearm.

**"Lethal fauna"? Only to a completely paranoid idiot. Australia is, like
most modern nations, quite safe, unless you are a complete moron. Wandering
around the bush is more likely to be dangerous to those who carry
insufficient water. Australian fauna is more likely to be more afraid of
humans. Given the chance, those animals will run away. Guns are helpful for
farmers, who wish to rid themselves of the worst pests. These include:
Cats
Dogs
Foxes
Rabbits
Rats

Apart from those species, guns are not much use.

But that isn't the
point. Organized feminist doctrine wants men disarmed so they are at
the mercy of the Nanny State in all things, in which feminists,
sodomites, halfwits, and members of influential alien minorities have
disproportionate if not absolute control.

**I'm starting to feel that you actually believe your own rhetoric. You are
one seriously demented, deluded human (and I use that term, very loosely).
Your Nazi roots are starting to show.


The feminine spirit has had disproportionate sway in Australia for
most of a century. The basic mentality is that of "cutting down the
tall poppies", of enforced egalitarianism, of an over powering
atmosphere of Scargill mentality trade unionism and a contempt of
anyone who would change the extant order for good or ill, except to
the extent those wanting change could enforce the widespread universal
propaganda that this or that particular change was really staying the
same, that keeping things as they were would really be to change even
more fundamental values.

Of course, this has propagated through the entire Western world in
much the same fashion. In my nation, or what is left of it, we fancy
ourselves the lone holdout, but that can't last forever. It has
already broken down in a great number of ways. In my opinion,
regaining manly virtue is key to our survival as a people everywhere
our people dwell..

**There seems to be no help for you and your Nazi mates. You have completely
lost touch with reality.


--
Trevor Wilson
www.rageaudio.com.au

[KeithR]

Jeßus wrote:
In article 8225cabc-2846-45e9-8ce1-1e35eb256494
@h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com, said...
:
:On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher ""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
:wrote:
:
: you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
: for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
: usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
: group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
: Professionally yours
: Dr Patric
:
:Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
:launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
osts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
:viewpoint appears?
:
:After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.

You really are a ****wit.
And I suspect, an anti-gun nut in disguise.

You may be right, he seems hell-bent on ruining the reputation of gun
owners.

[KeithR]

John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?

How is Dorothy, by the way?

Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.

Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
obsession will hurt you.

[John-Melb]

On Nov 19, 7:44*pm, keithr wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?

Yes, why do you ask?


How is Dorothy, by the way?

Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.

You raised mention of Dorothy before me

Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
obsession will hurt you.

And you medical qualifications for recommending "treatment" are?

[keithr]

On 19/11/2009 8:47 PM, John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 19, 7:44 pm, wrote:
John-Melb wrote:
On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, wrote:

Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.

Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.

Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?

Yes, why do you ask?


How is Dorothy, by the way?

Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.

You raised mention of Dorothy before me

Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
obsession will hurt you.

And you medical qualifications for recommending "treatment" are?

A lifetimes observation of those who needed treatment and those who did not.

[Jeßus[_3_]]

In article , said...
:
:Jeßus wrote:
: In article 8225cabc-2846-45e9-8ce1-1e35eb256494
: @h40g2000prf.googlegroups.com, said...
: :
: :On Nov 18, 4:08 pm, the watcher ""coffeyman\"@out the back.com.au"
: :wrote:
: :
: : you seem to be somewhat delayed yourself,this is the professional term
: : for beingretarded. btw. what would it be about crossposting being poor
: : usenet etiquette that YOU seemingly arefailing to grasp? or is this
: : group NOT aus.hi-fi? pot,kettle,black!!
: : Professionally yours
: : Dr Patric
: :
: :Interesting, tell me, when Trevor Tosspot previously used aus.hi-fi to
: :launch his anti-gun venom and vitriol, did you complain about his
: osts, or do you find them OK, and are just upset when an alternative
: :viewpoint appears?
: :
: :After all, I do play by Tosspot's rules.
:
: You really are a ****wit.
: And I suspect, an anti-gun nut in disguise.
:
:You may be right, he seems hell-bent on ruining the reputation of gun
wners.

Exactly.

[Jeßus[_3_]]

In article 620f3005-d787-4612-be90-
,
said...
:
:On Nov 19, 7:44*pm, keithr wrote:
: John-Melb wrote:
: On Nov 18, 8:24 pm, keithr wrote:
:
: Which obviously makes you every bit as bad as he is. It is pure
: hypocrisy to complain about trevor posting about gun politics in those
: groups and then doing it your self. You and he are one and the same.
:
: Yes, Keith, you've already made it quite clear that you don't have an
: issue with Trevor posting his O/T rants on aus.electronics, but get
: quite upset when alternative viewpoint appears.
:
: Yada yada yada, are you capable of more than one idea?
:
:Yes, why do you ask?
:
:
: How is Dorothy, by the way?
:
: Don't ask me after all it is your friend not mine.
:
:You raised mention of Dorothy before me
:
: Seek treatment now, the longer you leave it, the more your trevor
: obsession will hurt you.
:
:And you medical qualifications for recommending "treatment" are?

And yours are? Considering your frequent diagnosis of Trevor...