Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Mixing and Tracking at 96k verses 44k
Hello there, I was wondering what sample rate engineers are recoding
at. I have been recording in pro tools at 44k and 24 bit for the past three years. mostly pop,RnB, rap and blues bands. Is there an advantage to tracking and mixing at 96 k? Glenn. |
#2
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Mixing and Tracking at 96k verses 44k
|
#3
Posted to rec.audio.pro
|
|||
|
|||
Mixing and Tracking at 96k verses 44k
On Oct 25, 12:08*pm, Roy W. Rising
wrote: wrote: Hello there, I was wondering what sample rate engineers are recoding at. I have been recording in pro tools at 44k and 24 bit for the past three years. mostly pop,RnB, rap and blues bands. Is there an advantage to *tracking and mixing at 96 k? * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Glenn. As they say in court ... "Asked and answered" ... yesterday. And, by the way, it's "versus". *;-) -- ~ ~ Roy "If you notice the sound, it's wrong!" Sorry about the double post. My computer stopped updating saturday night? Until today. Glenn. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mixing and tracking at 96k verses 44k?? | Pro Audio | |||
Mac verses PC | Pro Audio | |||
Wireless headphones for tracking and mixing? | Pro Audio | |||
Headphones for studio work (tracking/mixing) | Pro Audio | |||
DIGI 001 Verses 002 here we go? | Pro Audio |