Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Bret L Bret L is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,145
Default Faux-Conservative Jews

((You know, I think Al Goldstein is more palatable than these guys. Al
is what he is. He's a good bad example. These guys you can't be sure
of. Bret.))


Faux-Conservative Jews

Edmund Connelly

April 18, 2010

"We Whites are in an increasingly perilous situation. More and more of our lives are at risk as the White percentage of the population declines worldwide. As Kevin MacDonald recently wrote about Anti-White Violence in South Africa, “A constant theme on this website is that Whites living in societies run by non-Whites are in physical danger. From the aftermath of the Bolshevik Revolution to contemporary Africa, the lesson is the same: Loss of political power means murder and mayhem directed against Whites by minorities with deep historical grudges.”


Given the challenges we face, it would seem only prudent that we
accept offers of help from others willing to carry water for our
cause.

Except I would rather decline the “help” proffered by faux-
conservative Jews.

For example, on paper radio show host and best-selling author Michael
Savage (born Michael Alan Weiner) sounds good for our cause, as Wiki
testifies:

Savage has summarized his political philosophy in three words:
borders, language, and culture. Some, including Savage himself, have
characterized his views as conservative nationalism, while critics
have characterized them as "fostering extremism or hatred." He
outspokenly opposes illegal immigration to the United States, supports
the English-only movement and argues that Liberalism and Progressivism
are degrading American culture.

An early Savage book from nearly twenty years ago, The Death of the
White Male, sounded like its heart was in the right place, arguing
that affirmative action was reverse discrimination.

Savage’s big publishing break, however, came in 2003 when his book The
Savage Nation: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on Our Borders,
Language and Culture made it to the top of the NYTimes best-seller
list. There he claimed to be saving us from a "homosexualized,
feminized America" that is "unraveling the very fabric of this great
nation."

Next came The Enemy Within: Saving America from the Liberal Assault on
Our Churches, Schools, and Military which argues, among other things,
that “the Left operates specifically to undermine God, country,
family, and the military" and that liberalism is "either treason or
insanity" or "a mental disorder." He also goes after immigration
again, discusses "Hollywood Idiots," and claims that Ruth Bader
Ginsberg's appointment to the Supreme Court was "akin to appointing
the general counsel of the Ku Klux Klan to the bench."

Since this all sounds pretty good, what’s my beef? Basically, my beef
is that Savage seems to me to fit into the mold of the controlled
opposition. By that, I mean that the largely Jewish elite in America
attempts to appease and distract Whites from successfully pursuing
their best interests by co-opting a genuine White movement.

Someone like Rush Limbaugh perfectly fits the bill. He’ll hit many of
the crucial issues that Whites embrace, but he will never get close to
the core of the problem: Jews fomenting these anti-White movements.

The result is that Jews are prominent only on the left, but also on
the (faux) conservative Right. I’m not even going to talk about the
neocons. I want to talk about the culture warriors who are Jewish and
have elbowed aside more genuine White activists like Pat Buchanan and
the late Sam Francis.

Sure, Savage mocks a few Jews, prompting at least one group to call
him a self-hating Jew. But does his oeuvre do anything to help us get
to the Jewish core of this “culture of critique” that Savage only
superficially attacks?

Here he gives his views on "Who assaulted the White race? Who set out
to destroy the White people?" He blames four individuals, three of
whom are Jews and all of whom are linked to the 1960s countercultu
Alan Ginsberg, Bella Abzug, William Kunstler, and Timothy Leary. But
he never identifies them as Jews, and that's as far as his "analysis"
goes — perhaps all one can expect from mainstream talk radio.

Another example of a Jewish faux-conservative is Bernard Goldberg. His
book, Bias: A CBS Insider Exposes How the Media Distort the News, is
devilishly effective at feigning an attack on the problems of
liberalism. Its real accomplishment, however, is that it lets Jews as
Jews off scot-free. It creates the illusion of attacking the proper
target but in fact leads readers off to pursue harmless remedies.
Thus, Professor Connelly here will give Goldberg an “A+” for
obfuscation.

This tactic has been necessary for the Jewish group evolutionary
strategy, for it fends off the normal outrage of a dispossessed and
mocked host culture. As Kevin MacDonald noted in the TOO Blog on the
issue of Jewish loyalty to Israel, “This sort of subterfuge is central
to Jewish efforts at influencing policy in a wide range of areas.”

The Jewish culture of deceit indeed.

One of the more sophisticated examples of Jewish faux-conservatism
comes in the person of former radical David Horowitz, whose conversion
book Destructive Generation: Second Thoughts About the '60s is quite
candid about Jewish behavior. His even more personal book Radical Son:
A Generational Odyssey was one of the best insider views of the Jewish
subversive mindset that I’ve read. It left me convinced that Horowitz
to a large degree personally believes in his critique of Jewish
thinking and behavior.

Be that as it may, it really does nothing to absolve his work from the
charge of subterfuge — in this case on behalf of Israel and the wider
war on Islam. His book Indoctrination U: The Left's War Against
Academic Freedom, for instance, appears sincere in some parts in its
attack on the Left. But for anyone wishing to look carefully, it is
abundantly clear that the main point is to attack leftist critics of
Israel.

I’ve been studying these Jewish faux-conservatives for some time now
and am impressed with the way the mainstream media accepts them as
authoritative, all the while going through the motions of labeling
them as dangerous because of their “extreme” conservative views. In
fact, however, they are all part of the game — members of the inner
circle. And they can get away with far more than their Gentile
counterparts.

Now comes a conundrum, wrapped in an enigma, slathered with lox and
cream cheese (and maybe followed by a whiskey chaser): the case of one
Andrew Breitbart, Internet phenomonon, and socially constructed Jew.

Last month, TIME magazine ran a long story on him, Citizen Breitbart:
The Web's New Right-Wing Impresario. Before knowing anything about
the man, I thought the first part of the story sounded good, as he was
attacking our rotten, anti-White liberal system:

“Their entire structure is writhing in diseased agony on the side of
the road, and they don't even realize it," Breitbart says. But the
left isn't the only object of disdain. "I'm sick of this effete GOP
nothing sandwich," he adds, growing more animated. "As long as
everyone is so pristine and socially registered, we're going to
lose." . . .

Breitbart perceives himself as a new-media David out to slay old-media
Goliaths. As he sees it, the left exercises its power not via mastery
of the issues but through control of the entertainment industry, print
and television journalism and government agencies that set social
policy. "Politics," he often says, "is downstream from culture. I want
to change the cultural narrative." . . .

Great, he’s on to Jewish cultural hegemony. I then wondered how far he
would go.

Before I got an answer to that, I ran into this shocker:

Breitbart was raised in Brentwood, on Los Angeles' privileged west
side. The area is home to studio executives and producers, and the
politics are Democratic. Breitbart was never fully comfortable in
L.A.'s '80s social milieu. His parents are Midwestern Jews. (His
father ran a Santa Monica steak house.) They saw life differently than
the other kids' sophisticated dads and moms did. "My folks are from an
older and very silent generation," Breitbart says. "My dad is as
conservative as William F. Buckley was, but without the same
presentation.

Oh, so Breitbart gets a seat at the conservative table because his
parents are from the Midwest?

The problem is, my J-Dar was not set off by the photo TIME magazine
ran with the story:

Here’s another shot of him:



To my mind, that is not a Jewish face. In fact, it reminds me of some
of the stock Irish actors Hollywood uses to denote an Irish face, such
as that of Colm Meaney, who played Miles O'Brien on Star Trek: The
Next Generation and Deep Space Nine.

Or John C. Reilly, who appeared in The Perfect Storm, among other
films:

It seems my J-Dar was right; Breitbart is not really Jewish . . . sort
of. TIME may have opted to go with a self-desciption, but Slate gives
us more nuance. In Big Breitbart: Andrew Breitbart is messing with
you, we learn that “He’s Irish-American by blood. His sister is
Hispanic. Their father is Jewish. Their mother was born Midwestern
Protestant.”

Well if this doesn’t open up a box of postmodern multicultural worms,
I don’t know what does.

In one sense, Breitbart is treated like TIME tells us—as a powerful
new Jewish media mogul. In other words, just more of the same old
tired controlled "opposition." Like William Howard Kunstler, he’ll
talk a good game about the problems. (Kunstler is no conservative, but
he attacks our parasitical bankers, etc.) But nowhere will he connect
those problems to the Jews who cause them.

(Frankly, I’ve had the same feeling about Laurence Auster as well. In
fact, just recently fellow-Jew Paul Gottfried accused him of the
standard neocon crime of hating Muslims. Auster defends himself
here.)

Getting back to Andrew Breitbart, his story has all the trappings of
staged opposition. Plus he’s media savvy and full of self-confidence
as well, two traits some have said Jews possess in generous amounts.

The TIME writer gushes that Breitbart “has become the Web's most
combative conservative impresario — part new-media mogul, part
Barnumesque scamp. Last fall, he launched Big Government, the flagship
of his wickedly right-of-center sites, which also include Big
Hollywood, Big Journalism — which described the House's March 21
passage of the health care reform bill as a 'socialist putsch' — and
the news aggregators Breitbart.com and Breitbart.tv.”

Then at the National Tea Party Convention in Nashville in February

Breitbart introduced the star speaker, Sarah Palin, and delivered a
rousing jeremiad of his own. Assailing national reporters for
portraying the movement as "racist and homophobic," he used the dais
at the Gaylord Opryland Hotel to speak his version of truth to
mainstream media power: "It's not your business model that sucks. It's
you that sucks."

So our “new-media David” intends to slay “old-media Goliaths”? Since
we all know that media is heavily controlled by Jewish interests,
Breitbart is going to compromise their interests, right?

I don’t think so. This is all part of Breitbart’s “Barnumesque scamp”
routine, but it won’t fool media Jews. It has, apparently, fooled the
goyim, just as the hyping of Sarah Palin is fooling them. James
Edwards of The Political Cesspool has consistently exposed Palin for
the controlled opposition dupe that she is. And to the extent we buy
this hoax, we are “neoconned again.”

Still, as a White advocate, I’m a firm believer in the power and
reality of race; it is not merely a social construct. If Breitbart was
born White, then he’s White. There must be some remnants of that in
him, no matter what his upbringing.

Indeed there are. For starters, instead of going to a top-tier
university like his Jewish classmates, he went to Tulane University in
New Orleans. And he drank heavily. “The social life at Tulane was
splendid. ‘I was a drunk,’ says Breitbart, who estimates he spent five
nights a week at New Orleans bars with fellow Delta Tau Delta
fraternity members.”

And unlike many Jews, he actually liked Southerners, finding them
“warm and smart and less neurotic than Californians.” And what to make
of his statement "You've gone to Hebrew school, you've gone to
Auschwitz, you go, Never again, Never again. Then you go to Tulane and
you go, Maybe never again"?

While we can count on other Jewish faux-conservatives to faithfully
cloak the identity and behavior of their fellow Tribe members,
Breitbart may turn out to be a wild card — if he isn't corrupted by
the financial rewards of being a media star. And maybe this time the
wild card will play in our favor. "

Edmund Connelly (email him) is a freelance writer, academic, and
expert on the cinema arts. He has previously written for The
Occidental Quarterly.

Permanent Link: http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net...Breitbart.html
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Faux-intelligent humans

On Apr 18, 3:00*pm, Bret L wrote:
((You know, I think Al Goldstein is more palatable than these guys. Al
is what he is. He's a good bad example. These guys you can't be sure
of. Bret.))


((One thing we CAN be sure of is that you're ignorant swine, Bratzi.
There is not one iota of doubt about that. Unfortunately it's
ignorance that you willfully display on a daily basis like a fresh wet
brown stain on a diaper. Unfortunately the stink is equally as
offensive to those of us that are far more advanced than you. You are
lower than baby **** in the continuum of life. The bacteria the ****
contains is smarter than you are. Shhhh!))
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
GeoSynch GeoSynch is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 676
Default Jilly Erupted

Jilly broke out in sphincters and defecated herself to death:

Bret L wrote:


((You know, I think Al Goldstein is more palatable than these guys. Al
is what he is. He's a good bad example. These guys you can't be sure
of. Bret.))


((One thing we CAN be sure of is that you're ignorant swine, Bratzi.
There is not one iota of doubt about that. Unfortunately it's
ignorance that you willfully display on a daily basis like a fresh wet
brown stain on a diaper. Unfortunately the stink is equally as
offensive to those of us that are far more advanced than you. You are
lower than baby **** in the continuum of life. The bacteria the ****
contains is smarter than you are. Shhhh!))

----------------

Latrine duty has penetrated and imbued your entire being right down to the
molecular level, old girl.

You have, in essence and demeanor, turned into a gigantic colostomy bag.
Har-dee-har-har!


  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Clyde Slick Clyde Slick is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,545
Default Faux-intelligent humans

On Apr 18, 5:00*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"
wrote:
On Apr 18, 3:00*pm, Bret L wrote:

((You know, I think Al Goldstein is more palatable than these guys. Al
is what he is. He's a good bad example. These guys you can't be sure
of. Bret.))


((One thing we CAN be sure of is that you're ignorant swine, Bratzi.
There is not one iota of doubt about that. Unfortunately it's
ignorance that you willfully display on a daily basis like a fresh wet
brown stain on a diaper. Unfortunately the stink is equally as
offensive to those of us that are far more advanced than you. You are
lower than baby **** in the continuum of life. The bacteria the ****
contains is smarter than you are. Shhhh!))


"At least" he is less stinky than stinky
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
GeoSynch GeoSynch is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 676
Default Faux-intelligent humans

Art Sackmanure wallowed in steaming piles:

"At least" he is less stinky than stinky


Did you overflow your Depends again?




  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Faux-intelligent humans

On Apr 18, 4:31*pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On Apr 18, 5:00*pm, "Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason!"

wrote:
On Apr 18, 3:00*pm, Bret L wrote:


((You know, I think Al Goldstein is more palatable than these guys. Al
is what he is. He's a good bad example. These guys you can't be sure
of. Bret.))


((One thing we CAN be sure of is that you're ignorant swine, Bratzi.
There is not one iota of doubt about that. Unfortunately it's
ignorance that you willfully display on a daily basis like a fresh wet
brown stain on a diaper. Unfortunately the stink is equally as
offensive to those of us that are far more advanced than you. You are
lower than baby **** in the continuum of life. The bacteria the ****
contains is smarter than you are. Shhhh!))


"At least" he is less stinky than stinky


Hey Clyde, I notice that you've trained Senator Sugar to respond to
"stinky".

I guess I should call him that now too as it seems to be his preferred
name.
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.opinion
Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! Shhhh! I'm Listening to Reason! is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 278
Default Jilly Erupted

On Apr 18, 4:31*pm, "GeoSynch" wrote:
Jilly broke out in sphincters and defecated herself to death:

Bret L wrote:
((You know, I think Al Goldstein is more palatable than these guys. Al
is what he is. He's a good bad example. These guys you can't be sure
of. Bret.))


((One thing we CAN be sure of is that you're ignorant swine, Bratzi.
There is not one iota of doubt about that. Unfortunately it's
ignorance that you willfully display on a daily basis like a fresh wet
brown stain on a diaper. Unfortunately the stink is equally as
offensive to those of us that are far more advanced than you. You are
lower than baby **** in the continuum of life. The bacteria the ****
contains is smarter than you are. Shhhh!))

----------------

Latrine duty has penetrated and imbued your entire being right down to the
molecular level, old girl.


Look, Bratzi, Senator Sugar is rushing to defend you! Isn't that
romantic?

You have, in essence and demeanor, turned into a gigantic colostomy bag.
Har-dee-har-har!


I'm sorry, Senator, but the **** analogy has already been reserved for
Bratzi.
Reply
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Forgotten (Except on r.a.o) Conservative Bret L Audio Opinions 4 September 24th 09 03:57 AM
Faux Candle Chandelier [email protected] Vacuum Tubes 0 May 21st 09 03:02 AM
JEWS KILLED JEWS, NAZIS KEPT THEIR HANDS CLEAN AnonMoos Car Audio 0 September 21st 07 01:31 PM
JEWS KILLED JEWS, NAZIS KEPT THEIR HANDS CLEAN AnonMoos Car Audio 0 September 21st 07 10:18 AM
Classic Records faux pas ScottW Audio Opinions 6 January 31st 07 01:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:58 PM.

Powered by: vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 AudioBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Audio and hi-fi"