[Bret L]

Yes, Africa Must Go To Hell

by Alex Kurtagic on January 20, 2010


"I welcome James Jackson’s courage in pointing out the fact that Africa’s chronic dysfunction is the result of, not white European rule in the past, but black Africans rule in the present—that, rather than its being the result of European colonialism and post-imperial indifference, as is the Left’s contention, chronic dysfunction in the region is the result of European post-colonialism and post-imperial aid programs.

I will not accuse him of Leftism, but Mr. Jackson still commits the
fallacy— characteristic of the Left—of judging sub-Saharan Africa by
European standards, and still seems to assume that Africa would
develop into a European-style civilization if only Africans stopped
playing victim and got their act together, for once and for all. This
latter assumption stems from the belief, held by the Left, that black
Africans are Europeans with black skin. Said belief is linked to
another belief, one that values progress and measures it in terms of
convergence with Europe’s present techno-industrial society—a type of
society characterized by complex social organization, high technology,
industrial production, scientific discovery, capitalism, rule of law,
private property, citizen’s rights, modernity, and secular
rationalism. The abnormality of these beliefs in relation to some non-
European societies is not obvious to us, because we take them for
granted. But taking cognizance of it is important, for the
consequences are catastrophic: they underpin the entire aid and white
guilt enterprise, which have fuelled a population explosion in the
Dark Continent and the consequent tide of hungry and resentful
immigrants into Europe and North America.

I have argued for some time that if stability is ever to visit the
Dark Continent, we must allow black Africans to diverge from Europe
and to reorganize in a manner harmonious with their temperament,
proclivities, and endowments. I have also argued that we must not
intervene, even if the end result is disturbing to us. What Africa
needs is not more money and development, but none. Black Africans are
different from Europeans. We may not wish to speak of African
cultures, because in relation to ours they seem primitive, but we must
accept that culture means something different for them than it does to
us, and, while me may well have an opinion, our opinion is irrelevant
if what they understand as culture is what works for them. Progress,
as important as it may be for us presently, is out of place there.
Africa has gone to hell because it must.

Read Why Africa is Hell by James Jackson on Takimag.com.

This is not to say that the present situation in sub-Saharan Africa
(and I stress sub-Saharan, because we must not tarnish Morocco and
Egypt with the same brush) is normal by African standards. It is not
normal. It is the result of a period of transition – from white
society to black society—that Western Leftists have been obstructing
ever since the end of empire with their well-meaning (but all the same
doomed) aid and development programs.

Traditional sub-Saharan societies are tribal; their spiritualities
animistic; their medicine witchcraft; their sanitation poor; their
farming subsistence or non-existent. J.R. Baker (Race, 1974) paints a
picture of uncivilization: the aborigines were naked or semi-naked;
they practiced self-mutilation; they resided in small settlements, in
simple, single-story dwellings; they sailed on crude canoes carved out
of tree trunks; they had not invented the wheel; they rarely
domesticated animals or used them for labor or transportation; they
had no written script or recorded history; they had no use of money,
no numbering system, no calendar; they had no roads; and they had no
administration or code of law. Chiefs were despotic, capricious, and
cruel; slaughter was frequent; cannibalism was sometimes practiced.
Dialects were simple, with limited vocabularies to express abstract
thought. The average tribesman lived for the moment and lacked
foresight. Any bright ideas usually perished with its inventor. Such a
picture efficiently explains Africa in the 21st century.

It also explains why aid and development funds have achieved nothing
except amplify the horrors in the continent: after all, once you
introduce money in the above context, the spear gives way to the
AK-47. Bono and Geldof and their fellow Live8 participants, the
ageing, self-righteous, self-indulgent, cosmetically-enhanced rock
stars that we know and loathe, have blood on their hands. So do the
Western charities and media for supporting such efforts.

“Bono and Geldof and their fellow Live8 participants, the ageing, self-
righteous, self-indulgent, cosmetically-enhanced rock stars that we
know and loathe, have blood on their hands.”


This why I think Mr. Jackson is right to want “the demolition of every
road, college, and hospital we ever built” in black Africa. This ought
to have been concomitant with de-colonization. If the European powers
no longer saw it feasible to maintain an empire, they ought to have
dismantled the colonial infrastructure and left the region as it was
first found by the early explorers. Outsiders ought to have been
forbidden, by an international covenant modeled after the Antarctic
Treaty of 1959, from upsetting the sub-Saharan habitat by declaring
the region a nature preserve. Of course, this was politically
impossible at the time, and the European conscience, already afflicted
by post-imperial guilt, would have been doubly troubled by the ensuing
famines (without industrialized farms, you cannot feed millions of
people). But the famines have, nevertheless, still visited the region,
and not only have they not been averted, but they have been multiplied
and magnified by the Western efforts to avert them.

The initial post-imperial famines might have been inevitable, but the
end result would have been a smaller, re-tribalized, pre-historical
population, able to feed itself through the traditional methods of
subsistence farming, hunting, and gathering. After a few generations,
sub-Saharan Africa would have no longer looked at the West with a
mixture of envy, frustration, and hatred, because it would have
forgotten about its existence, except through orally transmitted
fables and legends. The white man would have been remembered as a god
(or a demon)—as an alien being from another world, who built cities of
gold and had magical powers beyond imagination. After a few
generations, sub-Sahara African would have reverted to its pre-
colonial ways, and completed its transition from a collection of
failed states to a living record of humanity’s past. "


http://www.takimag.com/blogs/article..._gone_to_hell/