Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#121
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc, rec.audio.opinion, rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
On Jan 6, 12:49 pm, Clyde Slick wrote:
On 6 Ian, 08:33, MiNe 109 wrote: With horn tweeters, there's always the Charmin mod. Scented Charmin or un? Aroma therapy can be calming, note. Did you first learn of this mod on www.pcabx.com? No, from discussions of the Yamaha NS-10. Stephen |
#122
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
The Queen sends her emissary to enlighten the dark-dwelling denizens of Usenet. And what did you mean by "tat"? I'm asking on behalf of we who speak only standard English. tat noun 1. tastelessness sicby virtue of being cheap and vulgar a tasteless thing If that's the meaning you meant, your usage is inapt. Is English your first language? |
#123
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Clyde Slick said: With horn tweeters, there's always the Charmin mod. Scented Charmin or un? Aroma therapy can be calming, note. Did you first learn of this mod on www.pcabx.com? Doubtful. Krooger doesn't believe in flushing away valuable ... uh ... material. |
#124
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
jobar writes:
Todd H. wrote: Eeyore writes: "George M. Middius" wrote: Donkey brayed: They are after all simply over-hyped Chinese tat. Did you say "tat"? I did. And what did you mean by "tat"? I'm asking on behalf of we who speak only standard English. WordNet - Cite This Source - Share This tat noun 1. tastelessness sicby virtue of being cheap and vulgar a tasteless thing Okay, on behalf of millions of men who want to know, I need to ask "So where can I get this 'tat' and more importantly, where can I trade it for the other?" Sometimes 'tit' for 'tat' will be traded. Shhhh. It's not funny if you have to explain it to em! -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Todd H \ / | http://www.toddh.net/ X Promoting good netiquette | / \ http://www.toddh.net/netiquette/ | http://myspace.com/bmiawmb |
#125
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
"George M. Middius" wrote: If that's the meaning you meant, your usage is inapt. It's 100% correct. Chinese tat = cheap, vulgar, tasteless item made in China. Graham |
#126
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Todd H. wrote:
Eeyore writes: "George M. Middius" wrote: Donkey brayed: They are after all simply over-hyped Chinese tat. Did you say "tat"? I did. And what did you mean by "tat"? I'm asking on behalf of we who speak only standard English. WordNet - Cite This Source - Share This tat noun 1. tastelessness sicby virtue of being cheap and vulgar a tasteless thing Okay, on behalf of millions of men who want to know, I need to ask "So where can I get this 'tat' and more importantly, where can I trade it for the other?" Sometimes 'tit' for 'tat' will be traded. |
#127
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc, rec.audio.opinion, rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
On 6 Ian, 15:05, George M. Middius cmndr _ george @ comcast . net
wrote: Clyde Slick said: With horn tweeters, there's always the Charmin mod. Scented Charmin or un? Aroma therapy can be calming, note. Did you first learn of this mod onwww.pcabx.com? Doubtful. Krooger doesn't believe in flushing away valuable ... uh ... material. tho he does wipe his ass with $100 checks. Instead of flushing them, he goes to the bank to try and cash them, despite the smell. |
#128
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Poopie goes splat. If that's the meaning you meant, your usage is inapt. It's 100% correct. Chinese tat = cheap, vulgar, tasteless item made in China. The modifiers "vulgar, tasteless" are meaningless with respect to electronics. Cheapness implies poor performance, poor reliability, and/or poor longevity. One out of three is pretty bad. Is English your first language? Barn owl got your tongue, Donkey? |
#129
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
On 2008-01-01 12:55:45 -0800, Curmudgeon said:
All - Sorry for the extensive crossposting, but I wasn't sure which group was best targeted by this request for information and opinions. Thanks to the generosity of my brother, I have $200 to spend at Amazon and I have determined that my primary need is a new set of speakers for my Macintosh. I have loaded my entire CD library into iTunes and would like to begin using it as the playback-system-of-choice so I can begin selling off these little silver coasters. Everything's been encoded as AAC (128 kbps, 44.100 kHz), so the quality should be pretty decent. I have been running an original Cambridge SoundWorks system until just recently, but unfortunately it began cutting out on me as it warmed up. I'm certain that I could have it repaired, but I wanted to see if there might be a better system available to replace it. (In the meantime, I have been limited to an original set of Bose Roommates. They make some noise, but it isn't very pleasing!) The only demands I'll place on my new system are music reproduction (of all genres). I am not a game player, nor do I expect to use the system for surround-sound DVD playback. I just want a set of speakers that I can plug in, sit back, and enjoy. Please let me know what you would recommend and, more importantly, what you'd avoid. If I need to spend a bit more than $200, that's OK. And for the record, this is a 466 MHz G4 Macintosh running OSX 10.4.11 and iTunes 7.5 (although I can't imagine why any of that should matter very much). Cheers, and Happy New Year to all! Mudge For the last year I've been using the Bose Companion 3's and they are by far the best speakers for a computer I have ever used. The are connected to an iMac G5 and are primarily used for music via iTunes. |
#130
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
I imagine what you are hunting is someone to say -X are great, get them; y
are horrible so avoid. In making your decision, keep in mind the following: 1) How good are your ears? You can end up throwing dollars at sound you will never really hear. After 20 years of music training, I can "hear" music pretty good. I have visited some friends houses where they wanted to show off their new expensive Bose system. My first reaction (and that of another well trained musician there also) was -ugh, you got rooked (of course we acted like we liked them, to be polite). 2) What type of music do you listen to? If you want the throbbing bass-then, there are speakers that do that more effectively than others. 3) What size room and how loud do you listen? This will likely play a role in the RMS watts. If it is a bedroom and you don't plan on breaking glass, under 100 watts will likely be plenty. I picked up a pair of inexpensive Phillips MMS321 desktop speakers at Christmas to listen to music in my home office, played through the computer, under $60. It is a 2.0 system with 40 watts RMS, 80 peek. As I wanted something to fit on my desk and wasn't interested in a subwoofer, these have been fairly good. No, they don't give the thump, thump, bass vibration that you can "feel." But I mainly listen to big band and jazz, especially trumpet playing. They do very well in the mid and upper range, and cover enough of the bass that I can live with it. Again, bought for want I want -limited space, 12 ' x 12' room, not wanting to knock the wall down, main frequency interest in mid and high range. Best of luck. Let us know what you get. Steve "Curmudgeon" wrote in message ... All - Sorry for the extensive crossposting, but I wasn't sure which group was best targeted by this request for information and opinions. Thanks to the generosity of my brother, I have $200 to spend at Amazon and I have determined that my primary need is a new set of speakers for my Macintosh. I have loaded my entire CD library into iTunes and would like to begin using it as the playback-system-of-choice so I can begin selling off these little silver coasters. Everything's been encoded as AAC (128 kbps, 44.100 kHz), so the quality should be pretty decent. I have been running an original Cambridge SoundWorks system until just recently, but unfortunately it began cutting out on me as it warmed up. I'm certain that I could have it repaired, but I wanted to see if there might be a better system available to replace it. (In the meantime, I have been limited to an original set of Bose Roommates. They make some noise, but it isn't very pleasing!) The only demands I'll place on my new system are music reproduction (of all genres). I am not a game player, nor do I expect to use the system for surround-sound DVD playback. I just want a set of speakers that I can plug in, sit back, and enjoy. Please let me know what you would recommend and, more importantly, what you'd avoid. If I need to spend a bit more than $200, that's OK. And for the record, this is a 466 MHz G4 Macintosh running OSX 10.4.11 and iTunes 7.5 (although I can't imagine why any of that should matter very much). Cheers, and Happy New Year to all! Mudge |
#131
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
stevericks wrote:
I imagine what you are hunting is someone to say -X are great, get them; y are horrible so avoid. In making your decision, keep in mind the following: 1) How good are your ears? You can end up throwing dollars at sound you will never really hear. After 20 years of music training, I can "hear" music pretty good. I have visited some friends houses where they wanted to show off their new expensive Bose system. My first reaction (and that of another well trained musician there also) was -ugh, you got rooked (of course we acted like we liked them, to be polite). 2) What type of music do you listen to? If you want the throbbing bass-then, there are speakers that do that more effectively than others. 3) What size room and how loud do you listen? This will likely play a role in the RMS watts. If it is a bedroom and you don't plan on breaking glass, under 100 watts will likely be plenty. I picked up a pair of inexpensive Phillips MMS321 desktop speakers at Christmas to listen to music in my home office, played through the computer, under $60. It is a 2.0 system with 40 watts RMS, 80 peek. As I wanted something to fit on my desk and wasn't interested in a subwoofer, these have been fairly good. No, they don't give the thump, thump, bass vibration that you can "feel." But I mainly listen to big band and jazz, especially trumpet playing. They do very well in the mid and upper range, and cover enough of the bass that I can live with it. Again, bought for want I want -limited space, 12 ' x 12' room, not wanting to knock the wall down, main frequency interest in mid and high range. Dude, Dude...do try to keep up. This thread is about a hundred posts long, and the OP has already selected, ordered and received his preferred speakers. He's even given a couple of listening reviews. I know it's tempting to reply if you don't check the group often...at least scroll down to the bottom and work up before..... jak |
#132
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Curmudgeon writes:
Thanks to the generosity of my brother, I have $200 to spend at Amazon and I have determined that my primary need is a new set of speakers for my Macintosh. I have loaded my entire CD library into iTunes and would like to begin using it as the playback-system-of-choice so I can begin selling off these little silver coasters. Everything's been encoded as AAC (128 kbps, 44.100 kHz), so the quality should be pretty decent. I've been very happy with Klipsch's ProMedia 2.1 system. -- David |
#133
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
In article
, MINe109 wrote: No, from discussions of the Yamaha NS-10. I have those in my living room. Very nice. I've never padded them, though. The pair I have are more than 20 years old. -- W. Oates |
#134
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Marc Neveux wrote: On 2008-01-01 12:55:45 -0800, Curmudgeon said: All - Sorry for the extensive crossposting, but I wasn't sure which group was best targeted by this request for information and opinions. Thanks to the generosity of my brother, I have $200 to spend at Amazon and I have determined that my primary need is a new set of speakers for my Macintosh. I have loaded my entire CD library into iTunes and would like to begin using it as the playback-system-of-choice so I can begin selling off these little silver coasters. Everything's been encoded as AAC (128 kbps, 44.100 kHz), so the quality should be pretty decent. I have been running an original Cambridge SoundWorks system until just recently, but unfortunately it began cutting out on me as it warmed up. I'm certain that I could have it repaired, but I wanted to see if there might be a better system available to replace it. (In the meantime, I have been limited to an original set of Bose Roommates. They make some noise, but it isn't very pleasing!) The only demands I'll place on my new system are music reproduction (of all genres). I am not a game player, nor do I expect to use the system for surround-sound DVD playback. I just want a set of speakers that I can plug in, sit back, and enjoy. Please let me know what you would recommend and, more importantly, what you'd avoid. If I need to spend a bit more than $200, that's OK. And for the record, this is a 466 MHz G4 Macintosh running OSX 10.4.11 and iTunes 7.5 (although I can't imagine why any of that should matter very much). Cheers, and Happy New Year to all! Mudge For the last year I've been using the Bose Companion 3's and they are by far the best speakers for a computer I have ever used. The are connected to an iMac G5 and are primarily used for music via iTunes. "no highs, no lows, it must be BOSE". Some people are gluttons for aural punishment. Graham |
#135
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Warren Oates wrote: MINe109 wrote: No, from discussions of the Yamaha NS-10. I have those in my living room. Very nice. I've never padded them, though. The pair I have are more than 20 years old. They are shockingly coloured. The reason studios often had a pair was to see what a mix sounded like on indifferent hi-fi speakers. Graham |
#136
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
In article ,
Eeyore wrote: They are shockingly coloured. The reason studios often had a pair was to see what a mix sounded like on indifferent hi-fi speakers. I know. We called them "****-box" speakers (we also had these tiny little Auratones), but they sound great in my living room with my QED amp, which is also about 20 years old now. -- W. Oates |
#137
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
MiNe 109 wrote: Warren Oates wrote: MINe109 wrote: No, from discussions of the Yamaha NS-10. I have those in my living room. Very nice. I've never padded them, though. The pair I have are more than 20 years old. "If Your Mixes Sound Good on These, They Sound Good on Anything" There's a variety of opinions on these once ubiquitous monitors. Not my cup of tea, but I've seen them put to good use by audio pros. The tissue paper mod is also popular with them. Graham |
#138
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
In article , David C.
wrote: Curmudgeon writes: Thanks to the generosity of my brother, I have $200 to spend at Amazon and I have determined that my primary need is a new set of speakers for my Macintosh. I have loaded my entire CD library into iTunes and would like to begin using it as the playback-system-of-choice so I can begin selling off these little silver coasters. Everything's been encoded as AAC (128 kbps, 44.100 kHz), so the quality should be pretty decent. I've been very happy with Klipsch's ProMedia 2.1 system. -- David Thanks, David! That's exactly the system I settled on, and I have been using (and tuning) it for a couple of days now. I've discovered that as much as I stubbornly wanted to continue using a totally flat EQ profile in iTunes, the system sounds best if I use the "Loudness" profile. I've got the subwoofer volume set to the recommended 10:00 position. I also initially believed that I wouldn't need to boost the preamp gain, but discovered that at 0dB the sound doesn't audibly distort even at the highest volume setting -- this is a very gradual volume control -- so I am playing around with boosting the preamp. I think I've settled on +11 as an optimal setting, just short of full blast. (I have the computer's output set to 100% for maximum flexibility.) One thing that has really impressed me about the Klipsch system is that it seems to do its very best work with the most challenging material. I listen to a wide variety of music, but have found these guys are awesome with respect to reproducing "classical" stuff, and the more dynamic the better. (I've been listening to a lot of Bartok for the past few days.) I'd be very happy to hear back from you about how you've got your system set up. I'm pretty sure you're also a Mac guy since I believe I've seen a "David C." contributing to the Mac groups I frequent. For the record, I've got a 466 MHz G4 w/1 GB RAM running OSX 10.4.11 and iTunes 7.5. My library currently stands at 21,061 selections (all AAC @ 128 kbps and 44,100 kHz), and just past 72 days if I select the "Random" function and let it go. Cheers! Mudge |
#139
Posted to comp.sys.mac.misc,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Eeyore wrote:
"no highs, no lows, it must be BOSE". Hehe. Don't forget the missing mid-bass, which, if it was there, would be above the flatulent, one-note woofs of the "Accoustimass module", but below the capabilities of the ****ty little "tweeters" in their ****ty little plastic cubes. Some people are gluttons for aural punishment. Well, there's one born every minute, it's been said... |
#140
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
The last number of posts addressed the original question, just as I did.
Sorry-I have a life and don't always read 50 posts on every topic, though I did read the most recent. If it offends you, don't read them. Dude "stevericks" wrote in message . .. I imagine what you are hunting is someone to say -X are great, get them; y are horrible so avoid. In making your decision, keep in mind the following: 1) How good are your ears? You can end up throwing dollars at sound you will never really hear. After 20 years of music training, I can "hear" music pretty good. I have visited some friends houses where they wanted to show off their new expensive Bose system. My first reaction (and that of another well trained musician there also) was -ugh, you got rooked (of course we acted like we liked them, to be polite). 2) What type of music do you listen to? If you want the throbbing bass-then, there are speakers that do that more effectively than others. 3) What size room and how loud do you listen? This will likely play a role in the RMS watts. If it is a bedroom and you don't plan on breaking glass, under 100 watts will likely be plenty. I picked up a pair of inexpensive Phillips MMS321 desktop speakers at Christmas to listen to music in my home office, played through the computer, under $60. It is a 2.0 system with 40 watts RMS, 80 peek. As I wanted something to fit on my desk and wasn't interested in a subwoofer, these have been fairly good. No, they don't give the thump, thump, bass vibration that you can "feel." But I mainly listen to big band and jazz, especially trumpet playing. They do very well in the mid and upper range, and cover enough of the bass that I can live with it. Again, bought for want I want -limited space, 12 ' x 12' room, not wanting to knock the wall down, main frequency interest in mid and high range. Best of luck. Let us know what you get. Steve "Curmudgeon" wrote in message ... All - Sorry for the extensive crossposting, but I wasn't sure which group was best targeted by this request for information and opinions. Thanks to the generosity of my brother, I have $200 to spend at Amazon and I have determined that my primary need is a new set of speakers for my Macintosh. I have loaded my entire CD library into iTunes and would like to begin using it as the playback-system-of-choice so I can begin selling off these little silver coasters. Everything's been encoded as AAC (128 kbps, 44.100 kHz), so the quality should be pretty decent. I have been running an original Cambridge SoundWorks system until just recently, but unfortunately it began cutting out on me as it warmed up. I'm certain that I could have it repaired, but I wanted to see if there might be a better system available to replace it. (In the meantime, I have been limited to an original set of Bose Roommates. They make some noise, but it isn't very pleasing!) The only demands I'll place on my new system are music reproduction (of all genres). I am not a game player, nor do I expect to use the system for surround-sound DVD playback. I just want a set of speakers that I can plug in, sit back, and enjoy. Please let me know what you would recommend and, more importantly, what you'd avoid. If I need to spend a bit more than $200, that's OK. And for the record, this is a 466 MHz G4 Macintosh running OSX 10.4.11 and iTunes 7.5 (although I can't imagine why any of that should matter very much). Cheers, and Happy New Year to all! Mudge |
#141
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Recommendations for Computer Speakers?
Curmudgeon writes:
David C. wrote: I've been very happy with Klipsch's ProMedia 2.1 system. I'd be very happy to hear back from you about how you've got your system set up. I'm pretty sure you're also a Mac guy since I believe I've seen a "David C." contributing to the Mac groups I frequent. I didn't spend nearly as much time tuning mine. I also set the "subwoofer" knob to the "10:00" position indicated on the control. The subwoofer sits under my desk, with the speakers on a small shelf just above my monitor. For setting the volume, I set the Mac to it's maximum output, and set the volume knob to a position that makes my system alert-chime come out at an acceptable level, and leave it there. I use application-specific volume controls (in iTunes, the DVD player, etc.) to make adjustments from there. Yes, I'm a Mac guy. And you've probably seen lots of my posts (I'm reading this thread via comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc). I'm also a Linux, Solaris, OS/2 and Windows guy, but I don't spend much time on those newsgroups anymore. (Don't bother searching for posts, I had a different e-mail address back then.) For the record, I've got a 466 MHz G4 w/1 GB RAM running OSX 10.4.11 and iTunes 7.5. My library currently stands at 21,061 selections (all AAC @ 128 kbps and 44,100 kHz), and just past 72 days if I select the "Random" function and let it go. Dual 1GHz PowerMac G4 (QuickSilver 2002), 1.5G RAM, OS X 10.4.11, iTunes 7.5. You've got me beat for the music collection. I've got 9227 tracks (about 40.5GB), with a total play-time of about 30 days. Plus six more CDs that I haven't yet ripped. The older material was ripped at 128K AAC. The material ripped more recently is using 128K VBR AAC. (And it's all legal. Ripped from about 800 CDs, plus about 90 iTunes Store purchases.) -- David |
#142
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Moving my old computer speakers to my iMac
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008 20:19:35 -0700, Howard Brazee
wrote: I just got a 24" iMac and noticed it had one speaker plug. The speakers I have available are a pair of Acoustic Research Powered Partner 570s, and a Logitech Z640 5.1 system that's plugged into a Phillips PCS805 Aruilium sound card that's USB'd to one of the two Windows machines I'm giving away. What options do I have without spending more money? Note: Obviously, since the Logitech has front and back input plugs, I can't plug them all into the iMac directly. |
#143
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Moving my old computer speakers to my iMac
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:09:55 -0600, MiNe 109
wrote: That "speaker plug" is a mini stereo output that can also drive headphones. You'll need a mini stereo to RCA(s) patch cord to hook up the Powered Partners. I'd try that first, as those sounded pretty good. That is easy, they sound good, but I would be giving up 5.1 stereo and some tight desk space. One thing that is inconvenient is that the headphone jack is in the back, next to the speaker jack. That would be OK if my speakers had a headphone jack in them the way the Logitech speakers do, but is a pain when I want to switch between the two. I'm new to Macs - maybe I could plug in an extension cord for my headphones and switch via software. |
#144
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Moving my old computer speakers to my iMac
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:25:03 -0600, MiNe 109
wrote: I'm still confused. My iMac doesn't have separate headphone and speaker jacks, just the one and a line in. If you're willing to spend some money, an AirPort station could feed the Partners, freeing up the headphone jack. It's hard to read those little symbols back there with my aging eyes, and my computer is brand new. One symbol looked like headphones, another looked like speakers. The Phillips PCS805 Aurilium should work with your system, although my USB preamp (Yamaha CAVIT) lost its USB ability when I upgraded to 10.4.11. Maybe someone from the mac groups can help me! I guessed it might - but wanted advice from people who have more experience than I have. Maybe there's no reason for 5.1 on a Mac. Maybe I'd loose significant fidelity. Certainly my AR speakers sound good, even if they don't have the convenience of a headphones jack. |
#145
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Moving my old computer speakers to my iMac
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:25:03 -0800, MiNe 109 wrote
(in article ): In article , Howard Brazee wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:09:55 -0600, MiNe 109 wrote: That "speaker plug" is a mini stereo output that can also drive headphones. You'll need a mini stereo to RCA(s) patch cord to hook up the Powered Partners. I'd try that first, as those sounded pretty good. That is easy, they sound good, but I would be giving up 5.1 stereo and some tight desk space. One thing that is inconvenient is that the headphone jack is in the back, next to the speaker jack. That would be OK if my speakers had a headphone jack in them the way the Logitech speakers do, but is a pain when I want to switch between the two. I'm new to Macs - maybe I could plug in an extension cord for my headphones and switch via software. I'm still confused. My iMac doesn't have separate headphone and speaker jacks, just the one and a line in. If you're willing to spend some money, an AirPort station could feed the Partners, freeing up the headphone jack. Or, you could buy a pair of USB speakers. The Phillips PCS805 Aurilium should work with your system, although my USB preamp (Yamaha CAVIT) lost its USB ability when I upgraded to 10.4.11. Maybe someone from the mac groups can help me! Stephen |
#146
Posted to comp.sys.mac.hardware.misc,comp.sys.mac.misc,alt.audio.equipment,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.misc
|
|||
|
|||
Moving my old computer speakers to my iMac
"Sonnova" wrote in message
. net... On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:25:03 -0800, MiNe 109 wrote (in article ): In article , Howard Brazee wrote: On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 10:09:55 -0600, MiNe 109 wrote: That "speaker plug" is a mini stereo output that can also drive headphones. You'll need a mini stereo to RCA(s) patch cord to hook up the Powered Partners. I'd try that first, as those sounded pretty good. That is easy, they sound good, but I would be giving up 5.1 stereo and some tight desk space. One thing that is inconvenient is that the headphone jack is in the back, next to the speaker jack. That would be OK if my speakers had a headphone jack in them the way the Logitech speakers do, but is a pain when I want to switch between the two. I'm new to Macs - maybe I could plug in an extension cord for my headphones and switch via software. I'm still confused. My iMac doesn't have separate headphone and speaker jacks, just the one and a line in. If you're willing to spend some money, an AirPort station could feed the Partners, freeing up the headphone jack. Or, you could buy a pair of USB speakers. The Phillips PCS805 Aurilium should work with your system, although my USB preamp (Yamaha CAVIT) lost its USB ability when I upgraded to 10.4.11. Maybe someone from the mac groups can help me! Stephen Use an 1/8" stereo y connector (1 male to 2 females). Plug the phones into one jack and the speakers into the other with the 1/8" to rca males. Turn off the speakers when you want phones only. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Recommendations for a new computer for converting audio files | Tech | |||
Speakers Recommendations | Audio Opinions | |||
recommendations for computer speakers? | General | |||
Genius SW-5.1 speakers (Deluxe/the wooden ones) & other speakers for a budget computer 5.1 or higher system | General | |||
Recommendations for Computer Recording and Field Recording | Pro Audio |