View Single Post
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.audio.tubes,uk.rec.audio,rec.audio.opinion,rec.audio.marketplace,rec.antiques.radio+phono
Andre Jute Andre Jute is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,661
Default Who keeps crooks out of Kutztown?

Worthless Peter Wieck in response to a post by Gray Glasser listing
Worthless Wiecky's stalking, his cyberbullying, and his attempts at
blackmail, sent an abusive reply full of smoke and mirrors.

It is supposed to explain why the victim is responsible for Worthless
Wiecky over a period of two years sending hundreds of messages
hounding the victim's every post. It ignores the fact that the victim
simply ignored Worthless Wiecky, mostly making no response.

Worthless Wiecky's abusive reply doesn't answer any of Mr Glasser's
questions. Worthless Wiecky provides no defence for Mr Glasser's
accusations.

What it comes down to is that Worthless Wiecky did it because he
wanted to, for his own amusement, because he thought that denigrating
a more talented person would make his tiny dick bigger.

Below I give Mr Glasser's post in full, and Worthless Wiecky's
worthless reply in full. Worthless Wiecky, of course, cut away every
relevant part of Mr Glasser's post.

Worthless Peter Wieck's reply contains the following additonal lies:

Peter Wieck wrote [FULL POST BELOW]:

You will note that when you actually discussed tube-craft, I made no
comment whatsoever,


This is another lie by Worthless Peter Wieck. He persecuted my every
post, including technical ones.

despite the pretty obvious cribbing in your
posts...


This is another lie. It is also a professional libel on me.

It should be noted that I accused Worthless Peter Wieck of plagiarism
and proved it by his own words.

Prove these lies, scumbag, or I shall return to call you a liar.

The rest of your post, Worthless Wiecky, is one big lie inspired by
the envy of a little-nothing-janitor for someone with actual
achievements.

Andre Jute
No mercy for a slimy stalker


*******
FIRST, GRAY GLASSER'S LIST OF WORTHLESS PETER WIECK'S CRIMES:

wrote:

Peter Wieck wrote:

On Sep 18, 12:28 pm, wrote:
"Andre Jute" wrote:

It's amazing that the Kutztown organizers rent space to a man with the
reputation of Peter Wieck of Wyncote, PA. He is a notorious hoarder
and profiteer, and a netflamer and netstalker of anyone who exposes
him. His immorality, his stealing, his stalking and his lying has
earned him the contemptuous nickname "Worthless Wiecky" on the Usenet.
Don't the Kutztown organizers know this?

Fiultra

The difficulty with the Kutzdown Radio Meet is finding out who is in
charge.

The reputable and respectable Delaware Valley Historic Radio Club
(DVHRC) denies that it has any influence over who can be rented space.
According to Mike Koste, "The DVHRC has no financial interest or
control of facility, including the renting and assignment of vendor
spaces. The club merely acts as hosts."

The Radio Meet is held at Renninger's Antique and Farmer's Market in
Kutztown, PA. Renninger's are in the business of renting stalls to
fill their facility. They have neither the ability nor the desire to
weed out bad apples. As long as the stallholder doesn't defecate on
the floor, Renninger's don't care what sort of thief and scum he is.
Renninger's will rent even Peter Wieck a stall, regardless.

So nobody is responsibilie for keeping out bad apples. It is up to
concerned individuals like you to warn against undesirables like Peter
Wieck.

Regards,

Gray Glasser


Well, now. And Andre has never been "caught in a lie"... how about the
lie that Gray Glasser is a separate entity rather than merely yet
another schizoid manifestation of a diseased mind?


If you believe it, you should prove it, Worthless. You've tried before
and failed.

Andre, I use your "first" name (Christian, manifestly, it is not)


No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum.
The Boss has several times publiclty described you as scum, Worthless,
so why do you persist in your foul manners?

as a
simple indication - to you - that you are a childish git whining over
being challenged


The notion that a semiliterate janitor like you can challenge The Boss
is laughable. In any event, all you've done for a couple of years is
attempted character assassination which Mr Jute contemptuously
ignored.

in your own sandbox.


You came to RAT with the single intention of stalking The Boss, for
the sole and entirely discreditable reason that, in your own words, it
amuses you. You started abusing Mr Jute, without any provocation
whatsoever, even as he welcomed you to RAT.

And
when so-challenged choose to crap all over every other sandbox in
sight.


You defecated on the carpet in the house where The Boss practices his
hobby. So what's your beef when The Boss produces one of his internet
puppet shows with you as the star exhibit? Why should there be one
rule for scum like you and another for Mr Jute?

So, you do not deserve even the respect one would use
addressing a child. To others I generally refer to you as Mr. Jute, so
they better understand the actual lack of respect.


If you believe The Boss cares what you think, you're delusional as
well as very, very stupid. I heard him say once, in a lecture on
morality, something like, "Respect is only of value between free
peers. When it is offered or withheld as a form of blackmail, it is
worthless. The blackmailer does not have, cannot get, and will never
be given any respect." You're clearly a blackmailer, Worthless.

You abused Mr Jute without provocation for years, then offered to
cease if he would "stop prosetylizing". That is clearly an attempt by
blackmail to control what he says and how. I imagine The Boss regards
that, besides blackmail, as an assault on free speech.

Now, it was you that once wrote "want another go at it?" The short
answer is not really.


The Boss is a fair man. If you want to run, he'll let you run. He let
you run before, when he crisply and quickly made a public fool of you
by turning you into a golem of decayed pig offal stuffed into a cow's
bladder, and kicked you around like a football. He generously did not
pursue you after you ran. You stupidly returned to abuse him further.

But you do tend to fulminate and blather at
great and extreme length when prodded... clearly you haven't the
character to do anything but that.


You should find out who Andre Jute is, Worthless, and before much
longer, for the sake of your family. It is only you who think you're
messing with some limp intellectual with glasses.

Get a life, or your meds will fail. At this point I expect your stress
level to be well in the red-zone...


We note your lipsmacking relish over the prospect of doing someone
else harm. It is quite clear that you wish Mr Jute dead because he is
so patently superior to you in every respect.

given that you are over 60,
overweight and undertall,


The stalker always thinks he knows more about his victim than the
victim does.

that is not a good combination for the long
term.


Once more you wish The Boss dead. For what? For pointing out, and
proving, that you're a stalker, a thief and a liar? For being
charismatic and talented when you're dull and, well, dull? You're over
the top, Worthless.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA


With sincere contempt for a reckless fool,

Gray Glasser



*******
AND HERE IS WORTHLESS PETER WIECK'S ABUSIVE REPLY:

Peter Wieck wrote:

On Sep 19, 8:14 am, (a whole-cloth creation of
Andre Jute) wrote:

No gentleman would force familiarity on anyone who considers him scum.


And

In this country, there are generally two common definitions of a
"Gentleman": One being the sort who rests his weight on his elbows
whilst screwing someone, and the other being a 'remittance man' sort
who need not work for a living. I would be neither, and would never
claim to it.

Despite our present government, most Americans are pretty direct,
pretty tolerant, but and at the same time pretty much enjoy deflating
windbags, especially those capable of only a bad smell at their best
moments.

But, what we have here is you, fulminating and spinning just like an
Iranian centrifuge with one (1) sock-puppet and one (1) "commander" of
questionable antecedents (who, BTW, also questions the reality of
"Gray Glasser" as a separate entity) carrying your water.

Pathetic.

And you are obsessing pretty much 24/7.

Pathetic.

Assassins....

Pathetic.

You will note that when you actually discussed tube-craft, I made no
comment whatsoever, despite the pretty obvious cribbing in your
posts... It was on-topic and on point.

But shall we take a poll and rename this NG rec.audio.inner-tubes?

You are a pathetic, whining, lying, bit of pretentious never-was, and
no quantity of sock-puppets and no amount of amateurish vituperation
will change that in the slightest. There is a very sound legal
principle: Res ipsit loquitor.

You ask that I prove you are as I have described you above. You have
provided all the proof needed on several occasions, this latest
breakdown of yours only being the most recent.

Res ipsit loquitor: The thing speaks for itself.

Peter Wieck
Wyncote, PA