"Scott Dorsey" wrote in message
...
Paul Stamler wrote:
Oh, and while we're at it...it is *extremely* unlikely that you will ever
hear the difference between 48kHz and 44.1kHz recordings, just listening
to
them straight. If your product is going to be a CD, then 44.1kHz will
almost
certainly sound better because it won't need to be sample-rate-converted
from 48kHz. Only if your final product is going to be video of some sort
should you be recording at 48kHz.

Unless you're using an SV-3700, whose converter filters are so crappy
that you _can_ hear a difference between the two rates because the
aliasing
products are different.

I have always considered Panasonic DAT recorders to be treyf.

Peace,
Paul