wrote in message
nk.net...

"Clyde Slick" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
ink.net...

"dave weil" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 06:51:47 GMT, wrote:

"dave weil" wrote in message
om...
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 21:04:09 GMT, wrote:

I have not auditioned it and never will, I already know what
distortion
sounds like and I want no more of it.

Well then, isn't it reckless, nay, foolish, to judge a piece of
gear
without doing a DBT/ABX on it?

Not when the differences are as gross as they are with a WAVAC as
anyone
can
see from the Stereophile measurements. Plenty of audible distortion.
$300,000.00 for an amp that can't produce more than 2 watts of output
power
before 1% THD.
http://stereophile.com/tubepoweramps...ac/index5.html
For that much distortion a simple A/B test would be sufficient.

Which you haven't even done. So you haven't even done the minimum.


Because there's no need. If you can't tell that the WAVAC is a piece
of
**** from the review measurements, then you have no business discussing
it.

So, you've now conclusively PROVED that there's no need for double
blind testing. Thank you very much!

I win.

How many times have I and others said that when differences are gross, a
DBT is unnecessary?


That's what I say, too!
The differences between some ss cd players are gross.

Lack of data to support your position noted.

You don't need to ABX when the differences are gross!