The Big High-Resolution Download Rip-off
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011 00:52:14 +0000, Audio Empire wrote:
Has anybody a comment on how come nobody noticed, by listening (it wa=
s
found, apparently accidentally, by someone who was looking at the
frequency distribution of some of the files he'd downloaded), that
HDTracks and other web-based music selling services were
(inadvertently?) selling up-sampled 16-bit/44.1 KHz material as "hi-rez=
"
=C2=A0downloads and charging $20-$30 an album for them? Could it be tha=
t
there is no AUDIBLE difference between 16-bit/44.KHz material and so
called hi-rez as was found by Meyer and Moran in their notorius ABX
study of DSD, and that's why the fraud supposedly went unnoticed even b=
y
the people selling the music files?
Well I did take a look at some so called hi res audio files but did not
ever see any information above 20 kHz yet.
And don't know for a fact if there ever was a recording studio that had=20
equipment ( microphones ) that even could record anything above 20 kHz
but I think there never was, maybe until now.
I am waiting for the first real hi res recording studio and the first rea=
l
hi res music, then we start talking about whether or not differences are
audible.
And yes I know that people suggest that above 20kHz isn't a factor but I=20
don't know that, I do know however, it will not be a factor as long no=20
one is recording it :-)
If anyone know where to find real hi res music, please let me/ us know.
Edmund
|